IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bjafio/v19y2021i2p95-111n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Spill-Over of Food Quality Schemes on Their Territory

Author

Listed:
  • Donati Michele
  • Bodini Antonio

    (Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy)

  • Wilkinson Adam

    (Impact Measurement Ltd, London, UK)

  • Veneziani Mario
  • Antonioli Federico
  • Arfini Filippo

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Parma, Parma, Italy)

  • Amilien Virginie
  • Knutsen Steinnes Kamilla

    (Consumption Research Norway – SIFO, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway)

  • Csillag Peter
  • Török Áron

    (ECO-SENSUS Research and Communication, Szekszárd, Hungary)

  • Ferrer-Pérez Hugo
  • Gil Chema

    (CREDA – Center for Agro-food Economics and Development, Barcelona, Spain)

  • Gkatsikos Alexandros
  • Mattas Konstadinos
  • Papadopoulos Ioannis
  • Tsakiridou Efthimia

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Gauvrit Lisa

    (ECOZEPT, Montpellier, France)

  • Hoàng Việt
  • Nguyễn An
  • Nguyen Mai

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam)

  • Lilavanichakul Apichaya
  • Napasintuwong Orachos

    (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand)

  • Ristic Bojan
  • Stojanovic Zaklina

    (University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia)

  • Tomić Maksan Marina

    (University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Bellassen Valentin

    (UMR CESAER, INRA, Dijon, France)

Abstract

We study the effect of a set of food quality scheme (FQS) products within the local economy using a local multiplier approach based on LM3 methodology. To evaluate the effective contribution within the local area, we compare each FQS product with its equivalent standard/conventional counterpart. Local multiplier allows us to track the financial flows converging within the local area at the different levels of the supply chain so that we can measure the FQS product role in local economic activation. Overall, the FQS products exhibit a higher positive contribution to the local economy than the standard references. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the impact according to the product categories. In the case of vegetal products, the local economic advantage due to FQS is 7% higher than the reference products, but the statistical tests reject the null hypothesis that the medians are significantly different from zero. On the contrary, animal products exhibit a larger contribution of FQS than the standard counterparts (+24%). The PGI products (+25%) produce the major effect, while PDO products show a median difference lower (+6%). The organic and non-organic products seem to be substantially equivalent in terms of contribution to the local economy, due to the similarity in the downstream processing phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Donati Michele & Bodini Antonio & Wilkinson Adam & Veneziani Mario & Antonioli Federico & Arfini Filippo & Amilien Virginie & Knutsen Steinnes Kamilla & Csillag Peter & Török Áron & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo , 2021. "Economic Spill-Over of Food Quality Schemes on Their Territory," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 95-111, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:95-111:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jafio-2019-0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0046
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jafio-2019-0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bramley, Cerkia & Kirsten, Johann F., 2007. "Exploring the Economic Rationale for Protecting Geographical Indicators in Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Paolo Sckokai & Claudio Soregaroli & Daniele Moro, 2013. "Estimating Market Power by Retailers in a Dynamic Framework: the Italian PDO Cheese Market," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 33-53, February.
    3. Pieters, Janneke, 2010. "Growth and Inequality in India: Analysis of an Extended Social Accounting Matrix," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 270-281, March.
    4. Maureen Kilkenny, 1995. "Transport Costs and Rural Development," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 95-wp133, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Roberts, Deborah, 1998. "Rural-Urban Interdependencies: Analysis Using an Inter-Regional SAM Model," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 25(4), pages 506-527.
    6. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1998. "Transport Costs, the New Economic Geography, and Rural Development," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1201, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Wiedmann, Thomas, 2009. "A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 211-222, December.
    8. Eudokia Balamou & Demetrios Psaltopoulos, 2006. "Nature Of Rural–Urban Interdependencies And Their Diffusion Patterns In Southern Greece: An Interregional Sam Model," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 60-83, March.
    9. M. Henry Robison, 1997. "Community input-output models for rural area analysis with an example from central Idaho," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 31(3), pages 325-351.
    10. Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Kate Pangbourne & Deborah Roberts, 2015. "Small Towns and Agriculture: Understanding the Spatial Pattern of Farm Linkages," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 494-508, March.
    12. Leontief, Wassily, 1974. "Structure of the World Economy: Outline of a Simple Input-Output Formulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(6), pages 823-834, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:elg:eechap:14395_9 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Skuras, Dimitris & Psaltopoulos, Demetrios, 2016. "Estimating Spatial Employment Impacts of the CAP through Social Accounting Analysis," 160th Seminar, December 1-2, 2016, Warsaw, Poland 249760, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Hyytiä Nina, 2014. "Rural-Urban Multiplier and Policy Effects in Finish Rural Regions: an Inter-Regional Sam Analysis," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Andrew K. Copus & Mats Johansson & Ronald W. McQuaid, 2007. "One Size Fits All? Regional Differentiation and Rural Development Policy Un moule unique? Différenciation régionale et politiques de développement rural Sind alle Regionen gleich? Regionalen Differenz," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 13-21, December.
    5. Nur Amira Zainul Armir & Sarani Zakaria & Rawshan Ara Begum & Noratiqah Mohd Ariff & Norshamliza Chamhuri & Jalaluddin Harun & Noorlaila Mohd Talib & Mohd Amin Kadir, 2022. "Factors affecting industrial localization of timber mills in Peninsular Malaysia by econometric and spatial analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7833-7850, June.
    6. Karine Daniel, 2003. "Concentration et spécialisation : quel schéma pour l’agriculture communautaire ?," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 158(2), pages 105-120.
    7. Mark Partridge & Dan Rickman, 2010. "Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1311-1328.
    8. Holl, Adelheid, 2016. "Highways and productivity in manufacturing firms," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 131-151.
    9. Francis Aubert & Bertrand Schmitt, 2008. "Mécanismes économiques à l’œuvre dans les espaces ruraux, conceptions du rural et logiques de l’intervention publique," Post-Print halshs-01485712, HAL.
    10. Jean-Marc Callois, 2006. "Quality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach," Post-Print hal-01201116, HAL.
    11. Lu, Haiyan & Zhao, Pengjun & Hu, Haoyu & Zeng, Liangen & Wu, Kai Sheng & Lv, Di, 2022. "Transport infrastructure and urban-rural income disparity: A municipal-level analysis in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Elena G. Irwin & Andrew M. Isserman & Maureen Kilkenny & Mark D. Partridge, 2010. "A Century of Research on Rural Development and Regional Issues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 522-553.
    13. Nathaniel Dede-Bamfo & T. Edwin Chow & Chikodinaka Vanessa Ekeanyanwu, 2023. "Local Perspectives on Spatial Accessibility to Market in the Afram Plains, Ghana," International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research (IJAGR), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Robson, Edward N. & Wijayaratna, Kasun P. & Dixit, Vinayak V., 2018. "A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 31-53.
    15. Jean-Marc Callois, 2006. "Quality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 78, pages 31-51.
    16. Bertrand Schmitt & Florence Goffette-Nagot, 2000. "Définir l'espace rural ? De la difficulté d'une définition conceptuelle à la nécessité d'une délimitation statistique," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 257(1), pages 42-55.
    17. Chen, Z.M. & Chen, G.Q., 2011. "Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2899-2909, May.
    18. Schmitt, Bertrand & Henry, Mark S., 2000. "Size and growth of urban centers in French labor market areas: consequences for rural population and employment," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Yves Léon & . Agricultural Economics Society, 2003. "The evolving role of agricultural economists in policy-related research in the rural economy," Post-Print hal-01931645, HAL.
    20. Marco Baudino, 2021. "Rural-to-urban migration in developing economies: characterizing the role of the rural labor supply in the process of urban agglomeration and city growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(3), pages 533-556, June.
    21. White, Eric M. & Carver, Andrew D., 2004. "Modeling timber mill procurement influence effects on interstate sawlog exportation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 529-537, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    local multiplier; food quality scheme; economic spill-over; local areas; rural development; Q12; Q18; E12; F61;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • F61 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Microeconomic Impacts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:95-111:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.