IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/wly/corsem/v25y2018i5p948-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Boosting employee retention through CSR: A configurational analysis

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Marlen S. Krause & Nils Droste & Bettina Matzdorf, 2021. "What makes businesses commit to nature conservation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 741-755, February.
  2. Jelena Titko & Anna Svirina & Tatjana Tambovceva & Viktorija Skvarciany, 2021. "Differences in Attitude to Corporate Social Responsibility among Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, October.
  3. Andra Modreanu & Gabriela Nicoleta Andri?an, 2022. "Understanding Employees Needs Through Corporate Social Responsibility," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 56(2), pages 118-126.
  4. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "The Employees’ State of Mind during COVID-19: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
  5. Bilal Afsar & Basheer Al‐Ghazali & Waheed Umrani, 2020. "Retracted: Corporate social responsibility, work meaningfulness, and employee engagement: The joint moderating effects of incremental moral belief and moral identity centrality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1264-1278, May.
  6. Cachón-Rodríguez, Gabriel & Blanco-González, Alicia & Prado-Román, Camilo & Del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina, 2022. "How sustainable human resources management helps in the evaluation and planning of employee loyalty and retention: Can social capital make a difference?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  7. Michael Greiner & Jing Sun, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1360-1375, July.
  8. Zhi Zhang & Zhaoying Yang & Jiang Gu & Moon-Seop Kim, 2023. "How Does Multinational Corporations’ CSR Influence Purchase Intention? The Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism and Consumer Ambivalence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
  9. Xin Chen & Eric Hansen & Jianfeng Cai, 2023. "Synthesizing and comparing the different effects between internal and external corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behavior: A need theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1601-1614, July.
  10. Shamim Akhtar & José Moleiro Martins & Pedro Neves Mata & Hongyun Tian & Shumaila Naz & Maria Dâmaso & Ricardo Simões Santos, 2021. "Assessing the Relationship between Market Orientation and Green Product Innovation: The Intervening Role of Green Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Resource Bricolage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
  11. Fasilat Aramide Sanusi & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2020. "A proposed framework for assessing the influence of internal corporate social responsibility belief on employee intention to job continuity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2437-2449, November.
  12. Muhammad Farrukh & Muhammad Sajid & Jason Wai Chow Lee & Imran Ahmed Shahzad, 2020. "The perception of corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Examining the underlying mechanism," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 760-768, March.
  13. Chun Jiang & Qiang Fu, 2019. "A Win-Win Outcome between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Value: From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
  14. Fabricio Carlos Schmidt & Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini & André Luis Korzenowski & Reno Schmidt Junior & Karl Benchimol Xavier do Nascimento, 2018. "Evaluation of Sustainability Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
  15. Andra Modreanu & Gabriela Nicoleta Andrisan, 2022. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees: An Analysis of Romanian Post-millennials’ Perceptions," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 651-658, September.
  16. Sanja Pekovic & Marcus Wagner & Sebastian Vogt, 2022. "Differential effects of corporate social responsibility on downsizing: Evidence from the United States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1021-1033, July.
  17. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung, 2018. "Employee Volunteering Meaningfulness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring the Effects of Organizational Support, Pride, and Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
  18. Silvia Ferramosca & Roberto Verona, 2020. "Framing the evolution of corporate social responsibility as a discipline (1973–2018): A large‐scale scientometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 178-203, January.
  19. Florina Pinzaru & Alina Mihaela Dima & Alexandra Zbuchea & Zoltan Veres, 2022. "Adopting Sustainability and Digital Transformation in Business in Romania: A Multifaceted Approach in the Context of the Just Transition," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 1-28.
  20. Felipe Lillo-Viedma & Pedro Severino-González & Valentin Santander-Ramírez & Leidy Y. García & Nataly Guiñez-Cabrera & Nicolás Astorga-Bustos, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Network Analysis: Unionized Workers’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
  21. Jonathan Luffarelli & Panos Markou & Antonios Stamatogiannakis & Dilney Gonçalves, 2019. "The effect of corporate social performance on the financial performance of business‐to‐business and business‐to‐consumer firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1333-1350, November.
  22. Juelin Yin & Jiangyan Li & Jun Ma, 2024. "The Effects of CEO Awards on Corporate Social Responsibility Focus," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 897-916, April.
  23. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
  24. Yasir Hayat Mughal & Mahad Jehangir & Muzzamil Khan & Mehran Saeed, 2021. "Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm’s performance: A panel data approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 3173-3188, April.
  25. Erifili-Christina Chatzopoulou & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Vasia Agapitou, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 795-817, September.
  26. Sandra Castro-González & Belén Bande & Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez, 2021. "How Can Companies Decrease Salesperson Turnover Intention? The Corporate Social Responsibility Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
  27. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "The moderating effect of contextual factors and employees' demographic features on the relationship between CSR and work‐related attitudes: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1839-1854, September.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.