IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: testable restrictions and identification"

by Carvajal, Andres & Ray, Indrajit & Snyder, Susan

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Pierre-André Chiappori & Olivier Donni, 2006. "Learning from a Piece of Pie: the Empirical Content of Nash Bargaining," Cahiers de recherche 0619, CIRPEE.
  2. Ray, Indrajit & Snyder, Susan, 2013. "Observable implications of Nash and subgame-perfect behavior in extensive games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 471-477.
  3. Fabrice Talla Nobibon & Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Jeroen Sabbe & Frits C.R. Spieksma, 2008. "Heuristics for deciding collectively rational consumption behavior," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces0824, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
  4. John Quah & Andres Carvajal, 2009. "A Nonparametric Analysis of the Cournot Model," Economics Series Working Papers 465, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  5. repec:dgr:kubcen:200872 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Donald J. Brown & Ravi Kannan, 2006. "Two Algorithms for Solving the Walrasian Equilibrium Inequalities," Working Papers 945, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
  7. Donald Brown & Caterina Calsamiglia, 2007. "The Nonparametric Approach to Applied Welfare Analysis," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 183-188, April.
  8. Cherchye, L.J.H. & de Rock, B. & Vermeulen, F.M.P., 2008. "An Afriat Theorem for the Collective Model of Household Consumption," Discussion Paper 2008-72, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  9. Carvajal, Andrés & González, Natalia, 2014. "On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 177-186.
  10. Ruediger Bachmann, 2006. "Testable Implications of Pareto Efficiency and Individualrationality," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 489-504, November.
  11. Robert R. Routledge, 2009. "Testable implications of the Bertrand model," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0918, Economics, The University of Manchester.
  12. Christian Schwarz & Uwe Stroinski, 2009. "Is there a Walrasian Equilibrium in Exchange Markets with Endowment Effect?," Ruhr Economic Papers 0082, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
  13. Snyder, Susan K., 2004. "Observable implications of equilibrium behavior on finite data," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 165-176, February.
  14. Alvaro Sandroni & Wojciech Olszewski, 2008. "Falsifiability," PIER Working Paper Archive 08-016, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
  15. Wojciech Olszewski & Alvaro Sandroni, 2011. "Falsifiability," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 788-818, April.
  16. Bachmann, Ruediger, 2006. "Testable implications of coalitional rationality," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 101-105, October.
  17. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock, 2011. "Testable implications of general equilibrium models: An integer programming approach," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/131708, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  18. repec:dgr:kubcen:200476 is not listed on IDEAS
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.