Constrained egalitarian allocations

Citations

Cited by:

1. Sophie D'Amours & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2013. "An Educational Game in Collaborative Logistics," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 102-113, January.
2. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2019. "The Procedural Egalitarian Solution and Egalitarian Stable Games," Discussion Paper 2019-007, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
   • Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2019. "The Procedural Egalitarian Solution and Egalitarian Stable Games," Other publications TiSEM 6caea8c0-1dcd-4038-88da-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
3. Francesc Llerena & Cori Vilella, 2015. "The equity core and the Lorenz-maximal allocations in the equal division core," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(2), pages 235-244, April.
   • Llerena Garrés, Francesc & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2013. "The equity core and the Lorenz-maximal allocations in the equal division core," Working Papers 2072/212194, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
4. Takafumi Otsuka, 2020. "Egalitarian solution for games with discrete side payment," Papers 2003.10059, arXiv.org.
5. Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2013. "The equity core and the core," Working Papers 2072/220760, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
6. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2020. "Monotonicity and Egalitarianism (revision of CentER DP 2019-007)," Discussion Paper 2020-003, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
   • Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2020. "Monotonicity and Egalitarianism (revision of CentER DP 2019-007)," Other publications TiSEM 295f156e-91ad-4177-b61a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
7. Geoffroy de Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2022. "Fairness through the Lens of Cooperative Game Theory: An Experimental Approach," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 810-836, August.
   • Geoffroy de Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2013. "Fairness through the Lens of Cooperative Game Theory: An Experimental Approach," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1925, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
   • Geoffroy De Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2014. "Fairness Through the Lens of Cooperative Game Theory: An Experimental Approach," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000904, David K. Levine.
   • Geoffroy de Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2020. "Fairness through the Lens of Cooperative Game Theory: An Experimental Approach," Working Papers 2020-09, Brown University, Department of Economics.
8. Ray, Debraj & Vohra, Rajiv, 1997. "Equilibrium Binding Agreements," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 30-78, March.
   • Ray, D. & Vohra, R., 1993. "Equilibrium Binding Agreements," Papers 21, Boston University - Department of Economics.
9. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2004. "The Equal Split-Off Set for Cooperative Games," Discussion Paper 2004-110, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
   • Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2004. "The Equal Split-Off Set for Cooperative Games," Other publications TiSEM d83ae0df-8e70-4427-a46a-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
10. Francesc Llerena & Carles Rafels & Cori Vilella, 2008. "A simple procedure for computing strong constrained egalitarian allocations," Working Papers 327, Barcelona School of Economics.
11. Javier Arin & Jeroen Kuipers & Dries Vermeulen, 2008. "An axiomatic approach to egalitarianism in TU-games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(4), pages 565-580, December.
12. Vincent Iehlé, 2015. "The lattice structure of the S-Lorenz core," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 141-151, January.
    • Vincent Iehlé, 2015. "The lattice structure of the S-Lorenz core," Post-Print halshs-00846826, HAL.
13. Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Tijs, S.H., 2010. "A Technical Note on Lorenz Dominance in Cooperative Games," Other publications TiSEM 8221017c-5ccb-4f86-a944-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
14. R. Branzei & E. Gutiérrez & N. Llorca & J. Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "Does it make sense to analyse a two-sided market as a multi-choice game?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 17-40, June.
15. Francesc Llerena & Cori Vilella, 2013. "An axiomatic characterization of the strong constrained egalitarian solution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1438-1445.
    • Llerena Garrés, Francesc & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2012. "An axiomatic characterization of the strong constrained egalitarian solution," Working Papers 2072/203157, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
16. Arin, Javier & Kuipers, Jeroen & Vermeulen, Dries, 2003. "Some characterizations of egalitarian solutions on classes of TU-games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 327-345, December.
17. Klijn, Flip & Slikker, Marco & Tijs, Stef & Zarzuelo, Jose, 2000. "The egalitarian solution for convex games: some characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 111-121, July.
    • Klijn, F. & Slikker, M. & Tijs, S.H. & Zarzuelo, I., 2000. "The egalitarian solution for convex games : Some characterizations," Other publications TiSEM 614b77cd-430c-4048-856f-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
18. Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "Egalitarianism in Multi-Choice Games," Other publications TiSEM bfbd67a5-701f-4be7-a1c9-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
19. Agastya, Murali, 1999. "Perturbed Adaptive Dynamics in Coalition Form Games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 207-233, December.
20. Klijn, F. & Slikker, M. & Tijs, S.H. & Zarzuelo, J., 1998. "Characterizations of the Egalitarian Solution for Convex Games," Other publications TiSEM 0a127ca4-b1ae-47e7-a135-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    • Klijn, F. & Slikker, M. & Tijs, S.H. & Zarzuelo, J., 1998. "Characterizations of the Egalitarian Solution for Convex Games," Discussion Paper 1998-33, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
21. Cori Vilella, 2014. "The equity core and the core," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(1), pages 313-323.
22. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2010. "Monotonicity of social welfare optima," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 392-402, November.
23. Francesc Llerena & Llúcia Mauri, 2016. "Reduced games and egalitarian solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 45(4), pages 1053-1069, November.
24. Banerjee, Sreoshi & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2021. "Lorenz optimality for sequencing problems with welfare bounds," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
25. R. Branzei & N. Llorca & J. Sánchez-Soriano & S. Tijs, 2014. "A constrained egalitarian solution for convex multi-choice games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 860-874, October.
26. Llerena Garrés, Francesc & Mauri Masdeu, Llúcia, 2014. "On reduced games and the lexmax solution," Working Papers 2072/237591, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
27. Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Tijs, S.H., 2010. "A Technical Note on Lorenz Dominance in Cooperative Games," Discussion Paper 2010-101, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
28. Llerena Garrés, Francesc & Mauri Masdeu, Llúcia, 2014. "A note on the Lorenz-maximal allocations in the imputation set," Working Papers 2072/228404, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
29. Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "Egalitarianism in Multi-Choice Games," Discussion Paper 2007-55, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
30. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2021. "Monotonicity and egalitarianism," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 194-205.