IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cpr/ceprdp/8146.html

Cheap Talk with Multiple Audiences: an Experimental Analysis

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Mak, Vincent & Zwick, Rami & Rao, Akshay R. & Pattaratanakun, Jake A., 2015. "“Pay what you want” as threshold public good provision," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 30-43.
  2. Battaglini, Marco & Morton, Rebecca & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2020. "Social Groups and the Effectiveness of Protests," CEPR Discussion Papers 14385, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  3. Lafky, Jonathan & Wilson, Alistair J., 2020. "Experimenting with incentives for information transmission: Quantity versus quality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 314-331.
  4. Hagenbach, Jeanne & Perez-Richet, Eduardo, 2018. "Communication with evidence in the lab," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 139-165.
  5. Hu, Youxin & Kagel, John & Yang, Huanxing & Zhang, Lan, 2020. "The effects of pre-play communication in a coordination game with incomplete information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 403-415.
  6. Yang, Huanxing & Ye, Zexin & Zhang, Lan, 2025. "Teams versus individuals in pre-play cheap talk communication," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  7. Altmann, Steffen & Falk, Armin & Grunewald, Andreas, 2013. "Incentives and Information as Driving Forces of Default Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 7610, IZA Network @ LISER.
  8. Fehrler, Sebastian & Hahn, Volker, 2020. "Committee Decision-Making under the Threat of Leaks," IZA Discussion Papers 13746, IZA Network @ LISER.
  9. van Gils, Freek & Müller, Wieland & Prufer, Jens, 2026. "Microtargeting and voters’ unawareness: Experimental results," Other publications TiSEM 692dadf6-f0e5-4e35-9441-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  10. Sebastian Fehrler & Niall Hughes, 2018. "How Transparency Kills Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 181-209, February.
  11. Mikhail Drugov & Roberto Hernán-González & Praveen Kujal & Marta Troya Martinez, 2013. "Cheap Talk with Two Audiences: An Experiment," Working Papers 13-32, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  12. Daniel Habermacher, 2022. "Information Aggregation in Multidimensional Cheap Talk," Working Papers 169, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
  13. Xinyu Li & Ronald Peeters, 2016. "Cheap Talk with Multiple Strategically Interacting Audiences: An Experimental Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
  14. Battaglini, Marco & Lai, Ernest K. & Lim, Wooyoung & Wang, Joseph Tao-Yi, 2019. "The Informational Theory of Legislative Committees: An Experimental Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(1), pages 55-76, February.
  15. Mitra, Arnab & Shahriar, Quazi, 2025. "Voting under contradictory news," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
  16. repec:plo:pone00:0185183 is not listed on IDEAS
  17. Timothy N. Cason & Alex Tabarrok & Robertas Zubrickas, 2025. "Signaling Quality: How Refund Bonuses Can Overcome Information Asymmetries in Crowdfunding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 5933-5947, July.
  18. Daniel Habermacher, 2022. "Authority and Specialization under Informational Interdependence," Working Papers 142, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
  19. Gilles Grandjean & Marco Mantovani & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2014. "Whom are you talking with? An experiment on credibility and communication structure," Working Papers 285, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2014.
  20. Jonathan Lafky & Alistair J. Wilson, 2015. "Quality vs. Quantity in Information Transmission: Theory and Experimental Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 5426, CESifo.
  21. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-064 is not listed on IDEAS
  22. Alex Farnell, 2023. "False Start? An Analysis of NFL Penalties With and Without Crowds," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 24(6), pages 695-716, August.
  23. Ertac, Seda & Koçkesen, Levent & Ozdemir, Duygu, 2016. "The role of verifiability and privacy in the strategic provision of performance feedback: Theory and experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 24-45.
  24. Lai, Ernest K. & Lim, Wooyoung & Wang, Joseph Tao-yi, 2015. "An experimental analysis of multidimensional cheap talk," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 114-144.
  25. Grandjean, Gilles & Mantovani, Marco & Mauleon, Ana & Vannetelbosch, Vincent, 2017. "Communication structure and coalition-proofness – Experimental evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 90-102.
  26. Groseclose, Tim, 2021. "Do humans rationally discount biased signals? Evidence from the Crawford-Sobel Game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 306-317.
  27. Wang, Siyu & Houser, Daniel, 2019. "Demanding or deferring? An experimental analysis of the economic value of communication with attitude," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 381-395.
  28. Jonathan Lafky & Alistair Wilson, 2018. "Quantity Versus Quality: Experimenting with the Margins for Social Information," Working Papers 2018-02, Carleton College, Department of Economics.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.