IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zwi/outrep/15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuing the Coast: Economic Impacts of Connecticut's Maritime Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Robert S. Pomeroy

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Nataliya Plesha

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Umi Muawanah

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to ascertain and document the significance of the maritime industry to Connecticut’s economy. The specific objective was to estimate the total economic impact of maritime industry sectors through the use of an economic model of the Connecticut economy. This study defines the Connecticut maritime industry as including, but not limited to, shipbuilding, commercial fishing, aquaculture, tourism, recreational boating and fishing, marine manufacturing, marine engineering, port services, marine terminal operation, marine construction, marina operation, marine environmental services, and marine transportation. Because this industry buys goods and services from other industries in the state and hires local labor, its economic impacts cascade throughout the entire state economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert S. Pomeroy & Nataliya Plesha & Umi Muawanah, 2013. "Valuing the Coast: Economic Impacts of Connecticut's Maritime Industry," Outreach Reports 15, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:zwi:outrep:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.zwickcenter.uconn.edu/documents/or15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ten Raa,Thijs, 2006. "The Economics of Input-Output Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521841795, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    2. André Lorentz & Maria Savona, 2009. "Evolutionary micro-dynamics and changes in the economic structure," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Lionel Nesta (ed.), Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth, pages 137-160, Springer.
    3. Florian Blöchl & Fabian J. Theis & Fernando Vega-Redondo & Eric O'N. Fisher, 2010. "Which Sectors of a Modern Economy are most Central?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3175, CESifo.
    4. Aminu, Alarudeen & Raifu, Isiaka Akande, 2019. "ICT sector, output and employment generation in Nigeria: Input-output approach," MPRA Paper 92917, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Saša Èegar, 2020. "Water extended input-output analysis of the Croatian economy," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 38(1), pages 147-182.
    6. Akos Valentinyi & Berthold Herrendorf, 2008. "Measuring Factor Income Shares at the Sector Level," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 11(4), pages 820-835, October.
    7. Dave Zachariah & Paul Cockshott, 2017. "Leontief Meets Shannon - Measuring the Complexity of the Economic System," Papers 1705.02154, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    8. Domínguez, Alvaro & Santos-Marquez, Felipe & Mendez, Carlos, 2021. "Sectoral productivity convergence, input-output structure and network communities in Japan," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 582-599.
    9. Berthold Herrendorf & Richard Rogerson & ?kos Valentinyi, 2013. "Two Perspectives on Preferences and Structural Transformation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(7), pages 2752-2789, December.
    10. Thijs ten Raa, 2012. "Performance measurement in an input-output framework," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, December.
    11. Mattila, Tuomas & Koskela, Sirkka & Seppälä, Jyri & Mäenpää, Ilmo, 2013. "Sensitivity analysis of environmentally extended input–output models as a tool for building scenarios of sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 148-155.
    12. Xiao, Shiying & Yan, Jun & Zhang, Panpan, 2022. "Incorporating auxiliary information in betweenness measure for input–output networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    13. Accolley, Delali, 2016. "Physical and Human Capital over the Business Cycle," MPRA Paper 71017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Tathagata Banerjee & Zachary Feinstein, 2019. "Price mediated contagion through capital ratio requirements with VWAP liquidation prices," Papers 1910.12130, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    15. Áureo de Paula & Jose A. Scheinkman, 2010. "Value-Added Taxes, Chain Effects, and Informality," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 195-221, October.
    16. Hannah Sharp & Josefine Grundius & Jukka Heinonen, 2016. "Carbon Footprint of Inbound Tourism to Iceland: A Consumption-Based Life-Cycle Assessment including Direct and Indirect Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl & Sajad Rajabi & Muhammad Irfan & Reza Ranjbaran & Mohammad Ghasemi Doudkanlou, 2022. "COVID-19 restrictions and greenhouse gas savings in selected Islamic and MENA countries: An environmental input–output approach for climate policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13937-13989, December.
    18. Hachaichi, Mohamed, 2023. "Unpacking the urban virtual water of the Global South: Lessons from 181 cities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Bojnec, Štefan, 2016. "Dual-use products export multipliers with the indirect effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 287-296.
    20. Liliana DUGULEANA & Constantin DUGULEANA & Steliana BUSUIOCEANU, 2016. "A Structural Analysis of European Union Economy," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(3), pages 19-51, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Connecticut; Maritime Industry;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zwi:outrep:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauctus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.