IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbpre/p2022002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bildungsungleichheit nach der Hochschulreife - das lässt sich ändern: Eine Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit eines intensiven Beratungsprogramms 1,5 Jahre nach dem Abitur

Author

Listed:
  • Erdmann, Melinda
  • Pietrzyk, Irena Magdalena
  • Schneider, Juliana
  • Helbig, Marcel
  • Jacob, Marita
  • Allmendinger, Jutta

Abstract

Das deutsche Bildungssystem ist durch starke soziale Ungleichheiten am Studienübergang charakterisiert. Diese könnten durch individuelle Beratungen von Oberstufenschüler:innen abgebaut werden. Die Studie "Zukunfts- und Berufspläne nach dem Abitur" (ZuBAb) untersucht die Wirkung einer solchen intensiven und individuellen Beratung auf den Bildungsverlauf der Teilnehmenden, wobei das experimentelle Design der Studie verlässliche Rückschlüsse über die kausale Wirkung des Programms erlaubt. Basierend auf Daten, die rund 1,5 Jahre nach Erwerb des Abiturs erhoben worden sind (N = 1.064), wurde geprüft, ob das Programm die Studienaufnahme von Personen ohne akademischen Hintergrund fördert, ob es Bildungsungleichheiten am Übergang in das Studium reduziert und wie sich die Bildungsverläufe in Abhängigkeit von der Programmteilnahme in der Zeitspanne von einem halben Jahr und eineinhalb Jahre nach dem Abitur verändern. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine deutliche Programmwirkung auf die Studienaufnahme von Personen ohne akademischen Hintergrund von 8 Prozentpunkten sowie einen deutlichen ungleichheits-reduzierenden Effekt der Beratung (15 Prozentpunkte oder anteilig 71 Prozent). Dieser positive Einfluss des Programms geht darauf zurück, dass die Programmteilnahme tendenziell die Passung zwischen dem akademischen Leistungsniveau und dem gewählten nachschulischen Bildungsweg fördert. Zudem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass sich deswegen erst eineinhalb Jahre nach dem Abitur eine positive Programmwirkung abzeichnet (wohingegen ein halbes Jahr nach dem Abitur kein positiver Effekt messbar war), weil insbesondere Personen, die unmittelbar nach dem Abitur ein Gap-Year (z.B. Freiwilliges Soziales Jahr) aufgenommen haben, von der Programmteilnahme profitieren. Zudem zeigt die detaillierte Aufschlüsselung der Bildungsverläufe im Zeitverlauf, dass das Programm nicht nur die Studienaufnahme für Personen ohne akademischen Hintergrund und die Ausbildungsaufnahme für Personen mit akademischem Hintergrund fördert, sondern deskriptiv betrachtet insgesamt die Aufnahme irgendeines nachschulischen Bildungswegs unterstützt. Die Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass für umfassende Aussagen zur Wirkung von Bildungsprogrammen auch Personen hoher Bildungsherkunft untersucht werden

Suggested Citation

  • Erdmann, Melinda & Pietrzyk, Irena Magdalena & Schneider, Juliana & Helbig, Marcel & Jacob, Marita & Allmendinger, Jutta, 2022. "Bildungsungleichheit nach der Hochschulreife - das lässt sich ändern: Eine Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit eines intensiven Beratungsprogramms 1,5 Jahre nach dem Abitur," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2022-002, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpre:p2022002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251791/1/1797005731.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erdmann, Melinda & Pietrzyk, Irena Magdalena & Helbig, Marcel & Jacob, Marita & Stuth, Stefan, 2022. "Do intensive guidance programs reduce social inequality in the transition to higher education in Germany? Experimental evidence from the ZuBAb study 0.5 years after high school graduation," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2022-001, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Peter, Frauke & Spiess, C. Katharina & Zambre, Vaishali, 2021. "Informing students about college: Increasing enrollment using a behavioral intervention?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 524-549.
    3. Leone, Andrew J. & Li, Edward Xuejun & Liu, Michelle, 2021. "On the SEC's 2010 enforcement cooperation program," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    4. Ehlert, Martin & Finger, Claudia & Rusconi, Alessandra & Solga, Heike, 2017. "Applying to college: Do information deficits lower the likelihood of college-eligible students from less-privileged families to pursue their college intentions?: Evidence from a field experiment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 67, pages 193-212.
    5. Pietrzyk, Irena & Erdmann, Melinda, 2020. "Investigating the impact of interventions on educational disparities: Estimating average treatment effects (ATEs) is not sufficient," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 65, pages 1-1.
    6. Wendong Jia & Chengzhen Hu & Yuqin Wang & Yuming Gu & Guangrui Qian & Xiaoyu Du & Liying Wang & Yao Liu & Jiao Cao & Shanyu Zhang & Shuanghong Yan & Panke Zhang & Jing Ma & Hong-Yuan Chen & Shuo Huang, 2021. "Programmable nano-reactors for stochastic sensing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Kok Lay Teo & Bin Li & Changjun Yu & Volker Rehbock, 2021. "Constrained Mathematical Programming," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Applied and Computational Optimal Control, chapter 0, pages 55-78, Springer.
    8. Liu, Yanwu & Tu, Yan & Zhang, Zhongzhen, 2021. "The row pivoting method for linear programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erdmann, Melinda & Helbig, Marcel & Jacob, Marita & Pietrzyk, Irena & Schneider, Juliana & Allmendinger, Jutta, 2022. "Soziale Ungleichheit beim Hochschulzugang verringern: Intensive Beratung fördert die Passung zwischen Potenzialen und Bildungsentscheidungen," WZBrief Bildung 45, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Castillejo-Cuberos, A. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R., 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of photovoltaic plants considering high temporal resolution and non-linear dynamics of battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    3. Erdmann, Melinda & Pietrzyk, Irena Magdalena & Schneider, Juliana & Helbig, Marcel & Jacob, Marita & Allmendinger, Jutta, 2022. "Educational inequality after high school graduation - there is a way to change that: An inquiry into the effectiveness of an intensive counseling program 1.5 years after high school graduation," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2022-003, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Patrizia Ghisellini & Amos Ncube & Gianni D’Ambrosio & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2021. "Potential Energy Savings from Circular Economy Scenarios Based on Construction and Agri-Food Waste in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Peter, Frauke H. & Zambre, Vaishali, 2017. "Intended college enrollment and educational inequality: Do students lack information?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-141.
    6. Xianbo Li, 2022. "Sequence Model and Prediction for Sustainable Enrollments in Chinese Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Florian Schoner & Lukas Mergele & Larissa Zierow, 2021. "Grading Student Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 9275, CESifo.
    8. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Peter, Frauke & Wiederhold, Simon, 2021. "Behavioral Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment," IZA Discussion Papers 14698, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/527ht1a96e837pq2dubgo2953q is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Estelle Herbaut & Koen Geven, 2019. "What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-)Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/527ht1a96e8, Sciences Po.
    11. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Peter, Frauke & Wiederhold, Simon, 2021. "Behavioral Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment," IZA Discussion Papers 14698, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Jan Berkes & Frauke Peter & C. Katharina Spiess & Felix Weinhardt, 2022. "Information Provision and Postgraduate Studies," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(355), pages 627-646, July.
    13. Estelle Herbaut & Koen Geven, 2019. "What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-)Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03456943, HAL.
    14. Vishal Maingi & Zhao Zhang & Chris Thachuk & Namita Sarraf & Edwin R. Chapman & Paul W. K. Rothemund, 2023. "Digital nanoreactors to control absolute stoichiometry and spatiotemporal behavior of DNA receptors within lipid bilayers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Bertoni, Marco & Corazzini, Luca & Robone, Silvana, 2019. "Promoting Breast Cancer Screening Take-Ups with Zero Cost: Evidence from an Experiment on Formatting Invitation Letters in Italy," IZA Discussion Papers 12193, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Estelle Herbaut & Koen Geven, 2019. "What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-)Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid," Working Papers hal-03456943, HAL.
    17. Erdmann, Melinda & Helbig, Marcel & Stuth, Stefan, 2021. "Lehrende als Gatekeeper für externe Förderprogramme im Bildungssystem: Eine Analyse von Fremdselektionsprozessen bei der Schülerauswahl anhand einer Bildungsintervention [Teachers as gatekeepers of," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 72(3), pages 255-282.
    18. repec:thr:techub:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:21-33 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pamela Giustinelli, 2022. "Expectations in Education: Framework, Elicitation, and Evidence," Working Papers 2022-026, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    20. Pietrzyk, Irena & Erdmann, Melinda, 2020. "Investigating the impact of interventions on educational disparities: Estimating average treatment effects (ATEs) is not sufficient," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 65, pages 1-1.
    21. Fitzenberger Bernd & Hillerich-Sigg Annette & Sprietsma Maresa, 2020. "Different counselors, many options: Career guidance and career plans in secondary schools," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 65-106, April.
    22. Tamás Keller & Károly Takács & Felix Elwert, 2021. "Yes, You Can! Effects of Transparent Admission Standards on High School Track Choice: A Randomized Field Experiment," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2125, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bildungsungleichheit; Studienaufnahme; Intervention;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpre:p2022002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.