IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wwuifg/93.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horizontale Kooperationen von Krankenhäusern: Der Analytic Network Process (ANP) als Entscheidungsunterstützung zur Wahl einer Kooperationsalternative

Author

Listed:
  • Heller, Christoph
  • Roßdeutscher, Axel

Abstract

Der Sektor der Gesundheitswirtschaft ist in starker und kontinuierlicher Veränderung begriffen. Nicht nur regulatorische Maßnahmen, sondern auch der fortschreitende medizinisch-technische Fortschritt sowie die Entwicklung der Kostenstrukturen haben in den vergangenen Jahren einen organisatorischen Wandel bei den Anbietern von Krankenhausdienstleistungen mit sich gebracht. Es kam zu etlichen Fusionen von Krankenhäusern und zu zahlreichen horizontalen Kooperationsverträgen. Diese Entwicklung entspricht auch dem Muster anderer Wirtschaftssektoren: Regulativer und technischer Wandel korrespondieren mit einer Zunahme von Fusionen und Kooperationen. Solche werden einerseits vereinbart, um die notwendigen Anpassungen durchzuführen, und andererseits, um vor geänderten Rahmenbedingungen wettbewerbsfähig zu bleiben. Auch bei Kooperationen im Krankenhaussektor gilt es, diese adäquat auszugestalten und ein geeignetes Kooperationsmanagement zu institutionalisieren. Im Mittelpunkt dieses IfG-Arbeitspapieres steht die Entwicklung eines Managementinstruments zur Vorbereitung von Krankenhauskooperationen. Es werden Kriterien identifiziert, die eine Orientierung für die Partnerwahl und für die konkrete Ausgestaltung ermöglichen und darauf aufbauend wird ein Instrument anwendbar gemacht. Ein Krankenhaus-Screening-Modell ermöglicht eine strukturierte Entscheidung. Ein praktisches Beispiel sowie die Formulierung eines Handlungsleitfadens erleichtern die konkrete Anwendung. Dieses Arbeitspapier entstammt dem IfG-Forschungscluster II: Unternehmenskooperationen.

Suggested Citation

  • Heller, Christoph & Roßdeutscher, Axel, 2010. "Horizontale Kooperationen von Krankenhäusern: Der Analytic Network Process (ANP) als Entscheidungsunterstützung zur Wahl einer Kooperationsalternative," Arbeitspapiere 93, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wwuifg:93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55780/1/687703352.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1986. "Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 841-855, July.
    2. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    3. Augurzky, Boris & Krolop, Sebastian & Gülker, Rosemarie & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schmidt, Hartmut & Schmitz, Hendrik & Schwierz, Christoph & Terkatz, Stefan, 2009. "Krankenhaus Rating Report 2009: Im Auge des Organs," RWI Materialien 53, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    4. Boris Augurzky & Sebastian Krolop & Rosemarie Gülker & Christoph M. Schmidt & Hendrik Schmitz & Christoph Schwierz & Stefan Terkatz, 2009. "Krankenhaus Rating Report 2009 – Im Auge des Orkans," RWI Materialien, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, pages 160, December.
    5. Saaty, Thomas L. & Takizawa, Masahiro, 1986. "Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 229-237, August.
    6. repec:zbw:rwimat:053 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Mindy & Pham, Hoang & Zhang, Xuemei, 1999. "A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 375-389, October.
    2. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    3. Hoene, Andreas & Jawale, Mandar & Neukirchen, Thomas & Bednorz, Nicole & Schulz, Holger & Hauser, Simon, 2019. "Bewertung von Technologielösungen für Automatisierung und Ergonomieunterstützung der Intralogistik," ild Schriftenreihe 64, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Institut für Logistik- & Dienstleistungsmanagement (ild).
    4. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    6. Pascoe, Sean & Doshi, Amar & Kovac, Mladen & Austin, Angelica, 2019. "Estimating coastal and marine habitat values by combining multi-criteria methods with choice experiments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Aull-Hyde, Rhonda & Erdogan, Sevgi & Duke, Joshua M., 2006. "An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 290-295, May.
    8. Reinsberger, Kathrin & Brudermann, Thomas & Hatzl, Stefanie & Fleiß, Eva & Posch, Alfred, 2015. "Photovoltaic diffusion from the bottom-up: Analytical investigation of critical factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-187.
    9. May, Jerrold H. & Shang, Jennifer & Tjader, Youxu Cai & Vargas, Luis G., 2013. "A new methodology for sensitivity and stability analysis of analytic network models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 180-188.
    10. Kang Xu & Jiuping Xu, 2020. "A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 359-388, September.
    11. Song-Kyoo Kim, 2014. "Explicit Design of Innovation Performance Metrics by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Expansion," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, May.
    12. Virginia Racioppi & Gabriella Marcarelli & Massimo Squillante, 2015. "Modelling a sustainable requalification problem by analytic hierarchy process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1661-1677, July.
    13. Stein, William E. & Mizzi, Philip J., 2007. "The harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 488-497, February.
    14. Carmone, Frank J. & Kara, Ali & Zanakis, Stelios H., 1997. "A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(3), pages 538-553, November.
    15. Montazar, Aliasghar & Gheidari, Omid Nasiri & Snyder, Richard L., 2013. "A fuzzy analytical hierarchy methodology for the performance assessment of irrigation projects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-123.
    16. Ilić, Damir & Milošević, Isidora & Ilić-Kosanović, Tatjana, 2022. "Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for smart city transformation: Case study Belgrade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Paul J. Componation & Dawn R. Utley & Robert L. Armacost, 1999. "Prioritizing components of concurrent engineering programs to support new product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 168-176.
    18. Ai-Hsuan Chiang & Silvana Trimi & Tun-Chih Kou, 2024. "Critical Factors for Implementing Smart Manufacturing: A Supply Chain Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Behnoosh Matani & Babak Shirazi & Javad Soltanzadeh, 2019. "F-MaMcDm: Sustainable Green-Based Hydrogen Production Technology Roadmap Using Fuzzy Multi-Aspect Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-32, December.
    20. Daji Ergu & Gang Kou & János Fülöp & Yong Shi, 2014. "Further Discussions on Induced Bias Matrix Model for the Pair-Wise Comparison Matrix," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 980-993, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wwuifg:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.