IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wwuifg/155.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Nachhaltigkeit von Genossenschaftsbanken: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Florian

Abstract

Genossenschaftsbanken sind darauf ausgerichtet, für ihre Mitglieder einen MemberValue zu erbringen. Damit ihnen dies dauerhaft gelingt, ist ein nachhaltiges Arbeiten unabdingbar. Dieses Arbeitspapier widmet sich der Fragestellung, welche Nachhaltigkeitsleistungen von den Genossenschaftsbanken erbracht werden und wo sie Handlungsfelder zur Aufrechterhaltung ihrer Nachhaltigkeit sehen. Als Grundlage der Analyse dienen die Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Befragung der Genossenschaftsbanken, die im März 2015 durchgeführt wurde. Die Ergebnisse lassen darauf schließen, dass die Nachhaltigkeitsleistungen in der ökologischen Dimension von durchschnittlicher sowie in der ökonomischen und sozialen Dimension von überdurchschnittlicher Höhe sind. Prioritärer Handlungsbedarf kann sowohl in der ökologischen als auch in der ökonomischen Dimension identifiziert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Florian, 2015. "Die Nachhaltigkeit von Genossenschaftsbanken: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung," Arbeitspapiere 155, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wwuifg:155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/121246/1/837312825.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theurl Theresia, 2013. "Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Genossenschaften durch MemberValue-Strategien," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 63(2), pages 81-94, June.
    2. Klein, Florian, 2015. "Identifikation potenzieller Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren von Genossenschaftsbanken: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 148, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    3. Yildiz, Özgür, 2014. "Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 677-685.
    4. Metz Matthias, 2013. "Gedanken zur Nachhaltigkeit im kreditgenossenschaftlichen Sektor," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 63(2), pages 147-152, June.
    5. Kühn Anna-Lena & Stiglbauer Markus & Zschäckel Ev, 2014. "Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung von Kreditgenossenschaften: Eine empirische Untersuchung," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 64(s1), pages 19-38, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schenkel, Andreas, 2016. "Kosten der Compliance-Regulierung: Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der deutschen Genossenschaftsbanken," Arbeitspapiere 169, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    3. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    4. Zhuk, A. & Zeigarnik, Yu. & Buzoverov, E. & Sheindlin, A., 2016. "Managing peak loads in energy grids: Comparative economic analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 39-44.
    5. Pons-Seres de Brauwer, C. & Cohen, J.J., 2020. "Analysing the potential of citizen-financed community renewable energy to drive Europe's low-carbon energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Salm, Sarah & Hille, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2016. "What are retail investors' risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 310-320.
    7. Eva Fleiß & Stefanie Hatzl & Stefanie & Sebastian Seebauer & Alfred Posch & Alfred, 2016. "Money, not morale: A study of the drivers behind investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2016-02, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    8. Shahriyar Nasirov & Carlos Silva & Claudio A. Agostini, 2015. "Investors’ Perspectives on Barriers to the Deployment of Renewable Energy Sources in Chile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Yildiz, Özgür & Rommel, Jens & Debor, Sarah & Holstenkamp, Lars & Mey, Franziska & Müller, Jakob R. & Radtke, Jörg & Rognli, Judith, 2014. "Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses," MPRA Paper 55931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea, 2023. "Civic engagement and energy transition in the Nordic-Baltic Sea Region: Parametric and nonparametric inquiries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    11. Schenkel, Andreas, 2015. "Bankenregulierung und Bürokratiekosten: Ein Problemaufriss," Arbeitspapiere 152, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    12. Lucas Roth & Özgür Yildiz & Jens Lowitzsch, 2021. "An Empirical Approach to Differences in Flexible Electricity Consumption Behaviour of Urban and Rural Populations—Lessons Learned in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    13. Yildiz, Özgür, 2016. "Public-private partnerships, incomplete contracts, and distributional fairness – when payments matter," MPRA Paper 74552, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Chiara Candelise & Gianluca Ruggieri, 2017. "Community Energy in Italy: Heterogeneous institutional characteristics and citizens engagement," IEFE Working Papers 93, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    15. Leszek Dziawgo, 2021. "Energy Sectors on Capital Market – Financing the Process “Towards Sustainability”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 938-955.
    16. Knoefel, Jan & Sagebiel, Julian & Yildiz, Özgür & Müller, Jakob R. & Rommel, Jens, 2018. "A consumer perspective on corporate governance in the energy transition: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 440-448.
    17. Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Heleno, Miguel & Victoria, Marta, 2021. "Self-consumption for energy communities in Spain: A regional analysis under the new legal framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. van Zyl-Bulitta, Verena Helen & Ritzel, Christian & Stafford, William & Wong, James Gien, 2019. "A compass to guide through the myriad of sustainable energy transition options across the global North-South divide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 307-320.
    19. Collier, Samuel H.C. & House, Jo I. & Connor, Peter M. & Harris, Richard, 2023. "Distributed local energy: Assessing the determinants of domestic-scale solar photovoltaic uptake at the local level across England and Wales," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Lucas Roth & Jens Lowitzsch & Özgür Yildiz, 2021. "An Empirical Study of How Household Energy Consumption Is Affected by Co-Owning Different Technological Means to Produce Renewable Energy and the Production Purpose," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-38, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wwuifg:155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.