IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tuedps/30.html

Die Eigentumstheorien Lockes und Humes und ihre Lehren für den Aufbau privatwirtschaftlicher Eigentumsordnungen in den Transformationsländern

Author

Listed:
  • Feldmann, Horst

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Feldmann, Horst, 1993. "Die Eigentumstheorien Lockes und Humes und ihre Lehren für den Aufbau privatwirtschaftlicher Eigentumsordnungen in den Transformationsländern," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 30, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104866/1/tdb030.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 1993. "Bulgarian banking reform faces major obstacles," Economics Update, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, issue Apr, pages 1-2,10.
    2. Martin Kupka & Ronald Radzai, 1992. "Transformation of Ownership in Czechoslovakia," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 25-46, October.
    3. repec:cup:jechis:v:33:y:1973:i:01:p:16-27_07 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mr. Eduardo Borensztein, 1991. "Proposals for Privatization in Eastern Europe," IMF Working Papers 1991/036, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Dhanji, Farid & Milanovic, Branko, 1991. "Privatization in Eastern and Central Europe : objectives, constraints, and models of divestiture," Policy Research Working Paper Series 770, The World Bank.
    6. Harald Sondhof & Markus Stahl, 1992. "Management buy-outs as an instrument of privatization in Eastern Europe," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 27(5), pages 210-214, September.
    7. Willgerodt Hans, 1993. "Enteignung Als Ordnungspolitisches Problem," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 42(1-3), pages 13-46, April.
    8. Marko Simoneti, 1993. "A comparative review of privatisation strategies in four former socialist countries," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 79-102.
    9. Willgerodt Hans, 1993. "Enteignung Als Ordnungspolitisches Problem," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 42(1-3), pages 13-46, April.
    10. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    11. Martin Kupka, 1992. "Transformation of ownership in Czechoslovakia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 297-311.
    12. Schmieding, Holger & Koop, Michael J., 1991. "Privatisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Konzepte für den Hindernislauf zur Marktwirtschaft," Kiel Discussion Papers 165, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    13. Eduardo Borensztein & Manmohan S. Kumar, 1991. "Proposals for Privatization in Eastern Europe," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 38(2), pages 300-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Daviddi, 1994. "Privatisation in the transition to a market economy," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 399-429.
    2. R. Daviddi, 1994. "Privatisation in the transition to a market economy," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 399-429.
    3. Blangiewicz, Maria & Charemza, Wojciech W., 1999. "East European Economic Reform: Some Simulations on a Structural Vector Autoregressive Model," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 535-557, September.
    4. Jocelyn Horne, 1995. "The Economics of Transition and the Transition of Economics," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(4), pages 379-392, December.
    5. Edgar L. Feige, 2003. "The Transition to a Market Economy in Russia: Property Rights, Mass Privatization and Stabilization," Development and Comp Systems 0312001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Apolte, T., 1992. "Osteuropa: Systemtransformation in der Krise?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 28.
    7. Raiser, Martin & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 1993. "Output decline and recovery in Central Europe: the role of incentives before, during and after privatisation," Kiel Working Papers 601, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    8. Jean-François Nivet, 1994. "La privatisation en Pologne : d'une approche plurielle aux difficultés de la privatisation de masse," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 279(1), pages 121-133.
    9. Tardos, Márton, 1998. "Sikeres-e a privatizáció?. Magyarországi tapasztalatok (1990-1997) [Has privatization been successful?. Hungarian experiences 1990-1997]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 317-332.
    10. Dinko Dubravčcić, 1995. "Entrepreneurial aspects of privatisation in transition economies," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 305-316.
    11. Robert Holzmann, 1993. "Reforming old-age pensions systems in Central and Eastern European countries in transition," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 191-218, December.
    12. Birke, Anja & Hensel, Vanessa & Hirschfeld, Olaf & Lenk, Thomas, 2001. "The East German electric power industry: between national property and competition," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 755-770.
    13. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    14. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    15. George Tridimas & Stanley L. Winer, 2018. "On the Definition and Nature of Fiscal Coercion," Carleton Economic Papers 18-09, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    16. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    17. Kurtis Swope & Ryan Wielgus & Pamela Schmitt & John Cadigan, 2011. "Contracts, Behavior, and the Land-assembly Problem: An Experimental Study," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments on Energy, the Environment, and Sustainability, pages 151-180, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    18. Ralph E. Townsend, 2010. "Transactions costs as an obstacle to fisheries self-governance in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 301-320, July.
    19. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    20. Agarwal, Jamuna Prasad & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 1992. "Methods and sequencing of privatization: what post-socialist countries can learn from Chile," Kiel Working Papers 527, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wftuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.