IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/smwarg/153.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

30 Jahre Wiedervereinigung: Mehr Mut zur Vielfalt

Author

Listed:
  • Feld, Lars P.
  • Fuest, Clemens
  • Haucap, Justus
  • Schweitzer, Heike
  • Wieland, Volker
  • Wigger, Berthold U.

Abstract

Seit der deutschen Wiedervereinigung vor 30 Jahren sind für den sogenannten Aufbau Ost nach Schätzungen mehr als zwei Billionen Euro aufgewendet worden. Dennoch unterscheidet sich der Osten Deutschlands in vielen Merkmalen noch immer vom Westen. Regionale ökonomische Unterschiede als Beleg für eine unvollkommene Deutsche Einheit zu werten, wäre jedoch verfehlt. Die Forderung nach einer nahezu vollständigen Angleichung des Ostens an den Westen offenbart nicht nur ein grundlegendes Unverständnis des Föderalismus. Auch aus historischer Perspektive lässt sie sich nur schwer motivieren. Der Kronberger Kreis, wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Stiftung Marktwirtschaft, sieht in dem Ziel einer nahezu vollständigen Angleichung des Ostens an den Westen eine Überdehnung der im Grundgesetz geforderten Gleichwertigkeit oder Einheitlichkeit der Lebensverhältnisse im Bundesgebiet. Es kann nicht Auftrag der Politik sein, jedweden ökonomischen Unterschied zwischen Regionen glattzubügeln. Vielmehr sollte es Aufgabe der Politik sein, in allen Teilen Deutschlands Voraussetzungen für eine grundständige staatliche Daseinsfürsorge zu schaffen, sodass die Regionen für die Bürger vor Ort gleichermaßen lebenswert erscheinen sowie Chancen- und Leistungsgerechtigkeit ermöglichen. Der Kronberger Kreis fordert, die unfruchtbare Diskussion um eine Angleichung des Ostens an den Westen zu beenden und sich stattdessen auf die Prinzipien des Föderalismus zu besinnen. Regionale ökonomische Unterschiede sollten nicht als Problem wahrgenommen werden, sondern als Teil einer gewachsenen regionalen Vielfalt. Statt Unterschiede einzuebnen, sollte der regionale Wettbewerb gefördert werden. Damit sie ihre spezifischen regionalen Standortvorteile stärker zur Geltung bringen können, sollten die Regionen mehr regulatorische Kompetenzen erhalten.

Suggested Citation

  • Feld, Lars P. & Fuest, Clemens & Haucap, Justus & Schweitzer, Heike & Wieland, Volker & Wigger, Berthold U., 2020. "30 Jahre Wiedervereinigung: Mehr Mut zur Vielfalt," Argumente zur Marktwirtschaft und Politik 153, Stiftung Marktwirtschaft / The Market Economy Foundation, Berlin.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:smwarg:153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/225017/1/1734965460.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sascha O. Becker & Lukas Mergele & Ludger Woessmann, 2020. "The Separation and Reunification of Germany: Rethinking a Natural Experiment Interpretation of the Enduring Effects of Communism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 143-171, Spring.
    2. Joachim Ragnitz, 2019. "Thirty Years after the Berlin Wall Came Down: Economic Transition Completed, but Structural Deficit Remains," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(03), pages 22-27, October.
    3. Clemens Fuest & Lea Immel, 2019. "Ein zunehmend gespaltenes Land? – Regionale Einkommensunterschiede und die Entwicklung des Gefälles zwischen Stadt und Land sowie West- und Ostdeutschland," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(16), pages 19-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Berbée & Sebastian Till Braun & Richard Franke, 2025. "Reversing fortunes of German regions, 1926–2019: Boon and bane of early industrialization?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 307-337, June.
    2. Simpson, Julija & Albani, Viviana & Kingston, Andrew & Bambra, Clare, 2024. "Closing the life expectancy gap: An ecological study of the factors associated with smaller regional health inequalities in post-reunification Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    3. Luis R. Martinez & Jonas Jessen & Guo Xu, 2023. "A Glimpse of Freedom: Allied Occupation and Political Resistance in East Germany," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-106, January.
    4. Jaanika Meriküll & Maryna Tverdostup, 2020. "The Gap That Survived The Transition: The Gender Wage Gap Over Three Decades In Estonia," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 127, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    5. William Pyle, 2021. "Russia’s “impressionable years”: life experience during the exit from communism and Putin-era beliefs," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Hoffstadt, Martin, 2022. "The Start of Yugoslavia's Disintegration: Where Borders Cut Commuting Spheres," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-701, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    7. Laliotis, Ioannis & Minos, Dimitrios, 2022. "Religion, social interactions, and COVID-19 incidence in Western Germany," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Richard Bluhm & Maxim Pinkovskiy, 2021. "The spread of COVID-19 and the BCG vaccine: A natural experiment in reunified Germany," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(3), pages 353-376.
    9. Nguyen, Thien Le-Hoang & Hsieh, Hui-Ching, 2025. "Iron curtain echoes: The enduring impact of communism and crowdfunding," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Pronkina, Elizaveta & Berniell, Inés & Fawaz, Yarine & Laferrère, Anne & Mira, Pedro, 2023. "The COVID-19 curtain: Can past communist regimes explain the vaccination divide in Europe?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    11. Ghazala Azmat & Katja Maria Kaufmann, 2024. "Formation of College Plans: Expected Returns, Preferences, and Adjustment Process," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 669-711.
    12. Barbara Boelmann & Anna Raute & Uta Schönberg, 2020. "Wind of Change? Cultural Determinants of Maternal Labor Supply," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2020, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin).
    13. Lars Mewes & Leonie Tuitjer & Peter Dirksmeier, 2024. "Exploring the variances of climate change opinions in Germany at a fine-grained local scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Costa-Font, Joan & Nicińska, Anna, 2023. "Comrades in the family? Soviet communism and demand for family insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118472, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Ghazala Azmat & Katja Maria Kaufmann & Yasemin Özdemir, 2023. "Socioemotional Development During Adolescence: Evidence from a Large Macro Shock," SciencePo Working papers hal-04350544, HAL.
    16. Chevalier, Arnaud & Marie, Olivier, 2024. "Risky moms, risky kids? fertility and crime after the fall of the wall," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Sven A. Hartmann, 2024. "Television and family demography: Evidence from a natural experiment in East Germany," IAAEU Discussion Papers 202407, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    18. Joan Costa‐Font & Anna Nicińska, 2023. "Comrades in the family? Soviet communism and demand for family insurance," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(4), pages 526-612, November.
    19. Biermann, Philipp & Welsch, Heinz, 2021. "An anatomy of East German unhappiness: The role of circumstances and mentality, 1990–2018," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-18.
    20. Flade Falk & Kamosiński Sławomir, 2021. "‘Kapitalisten’ and ‘Prywaciarze’. A Comparison of Nationalisation Campaigns in the GDR and Poland," Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(1), pages 163-188, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:smwarg:153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stmwide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.