IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb649/sfb649dp2015-031.html

Simultaneous likelihood-based bootstrap confidence sets for a large number of models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhilova, Mayya

Abstract

The paper studies a problem of constructing simultaneous likelihood-based confidence sets. We consider a simultaneous multiplier bootstrap procedure for estimating the quantiles of the joint distribution of the likelihood ratio statistics, and for adjusting the confidence level for multiplicity. Theoretical results state the bootstrap validity in the following setting: the sample size n is fixed, the maximal parameter dimension p_max and the number of considered parametric models K are s.t. (log?K )^12 p_max^3/n is small. We also consider the situation when the parametric models are misspecified. If the models' misspecification is significant, then the bootstrap critical values exceed the true ones and the simultaneous bootstrap confidence set becomes conservative. Numerical experiments for local constant and local quadratic regressions illustrate the theoretical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhilova, Mayya, 2015. "Simultaneous likelihood-based bootstrap confidence sets for a large number of models," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-031, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2015-031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/122000/1/831849967.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-067 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Kengo Kato, 2014. "Central limit theorems and bootstrap in high dimensions," CeMMAP working papers 49/14, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Qu, Zhongjun, 2008. "Testing for structural change in regression quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 170-184, September.
    4. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Kengo Kato, 2012. "Gaussian approximations and multiplier bootstrap for maxima of sums of high-dimensional random vectors," Papers 1212.6906, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    5. Johnston, Gordon J., 1982. "Probabilities of maximal deviations for nonparametric regression function estimates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 402-414, September.
    6. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers 29/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    8. Yufeng Liu & Yichao Wu, 2011. "Simultaneous multiple non-crossing quantile regression estimation using kernel constraints," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 415-437.
    9. Joseph P. Romano & Michael Wolf, 2005. "Exact and Approximate Stepdown Methods for Multiple Hypothesis Testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 94-108, March.
    10. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP29/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2015-031 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Shih-Kang Chao & Katharina Proksch & Holger Dette & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2017. "Confidence Corridors for Multivariate Generalized Quantile Regression," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 70-85, January.
    3. Joel L. Horowitz, 2018. "Bootstrap methods in econometrics," CeMMAP working papers CWP53/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Alejo, Javier & Galvao, Antonio F. & Martinez-Iriarte, Julian & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2025. "Unconditional quantile partial effects via conditional quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PA).
    5. Belloni, Alexandre & Chen, Mingli & Chernozhukov, Victor, 2025. "Quantile graphical models: Prediction and conditional independence with applications to systemic risk," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PA).
    6. Joel L. Horowitz, 2018. "Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics," Papers 1809.04016, arXiv.org.
    7. Christian Bauer & Sebastian Weber, 2016. "The Efficiency of Monetary Policy when Guiding Inflation Expectations," Research Papers in Economics 2016-14, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    8. Federico Ferraccioli & Laura M. Sangalli & Livio Finos, 2023. "Nonparametric tests for semiparametric regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(3), pages 1106-1130, September.
    9. Sungwan Bang & Soo-Heang Eo & Yong Mee Cho & Myoungshic Jhun & HyungJun Cho, 2016. "Non-crossing weighted kernel quantile regression with right censored data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 100-121, January.
    10. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney K. Newey, 2016. "Double machine learning for treatment and causal parameters," CeMMAP working papers 49/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Christian E. Galarza & Panpan Zhang & Víctor H. Lachos, 2021. "Logistic Quantile Regression for Bounded Outcomes Using a Family of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 325-349, November.
    12. Marilena Furno, 2012. "Tests for structural break in quantile regressions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(4), pages 493-515, October.
    13. Zhang, Feipeng & Li, Qunhua, 2017. "A continuous threshold expectile model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 49-66.
    14. Wolters Maik H. & Tillmann Peter, 2015. "The changing dynamics of US inflation persistence: a quantile regression approach," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 161-182, April.
    15. Byunghoon Kang, 2018. "Inference in Nonparametric Series Estimation with Specification Searches for the Number of Series Terms," Working Papers 240829404, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    16. Bonaccolto, G. & Caporin, M. & Gupta, R., 2018. "The dynamic impact of uncertainty in causing and forecasting the distribution of oil returns and risk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 446-469.
    17. Chernozhukov, Victor & Chetverikov, Denis & Kato, Kengo, 2016. "Empirical and multiplier bootstraps for suprema of empirical processes of increasing complexity, and related Gaussian couplings," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 3632-3651.
    18. Helmut Wasserbacher & Martin Spindler, 2024. "Credit Ratings: Heterogeneous Effect on Capital Structure," Papers 2406.18936, arXiv.org.
    19. Oka, Tatsushi & Qu, Zhongjun, 2011. "Estimating structural changes in regression quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 248-267, June.
    20. Marilena Furno, 2021. "Cointegration tests at the quantiles," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1087-1100, January.
    21. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-028 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:wyi:journl:002112 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Wang, Yongqiao & Wang, Shouyang & Dang, Chuangyin & Ge, Wenxiu, 2014. "Nonparametric quantile frontier estimation under shape restriction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 671-678.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2015-031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.