IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/rwimat/307133.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Akzeptanz von Energie- und Verkehrswende: Resultate des Sozialökologischen Panels für das Jahr 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Eßer, Jana
  • Frondel, Manuel

Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund der Mannigfaltigkeit an klima- und energiepolitischen Maßnahmen, die seit Beginn der Dekade eingeführt wurden, präsentiert dieser Beitrag die Ergebnisse einer Panelerhebung aus dem Jahr 2022, in der die Akzeptanz und die wahrgenommene Gerechtigkeit von ausgewählten Maßnahmen zur Energie- und Verkehrswende untersucht wurde. Die Befragung von rund 6.000 Probanden war Teil der Panelerhebungen des vom RWI etablierten Sozialökologischen Panels. Als wesentliche Ergebnisse sind hervorzuheben, dass die Energiewende von einer überwältigenden absoluten Mehrheit von nahezu 90% der Befragten befürwortet wird und die Befürwortung in positiver Weise mit der Bildung der Antwortenden und dem Haushaltsnettoeinkommen korreliert ist. In Ostdeutschland indessen wird die Energiewende im Mittel deutlich weniger stark befürwortet als in Westdeutschland. Die in einem randomisierten Kontrollexperiment präsentierten Informationen zu den Kosten und dem Nutzen der Energiewende veränderten die Akzeptanzrate mit Ausnahme einer experimentellen Gruppe nicht in signifikanter Weise im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe. Lediglich in jener Gruppe, der einseitige Informationen zu den Kosten der Energiewende für private Haushalte präsentiert wurden, lag die Akzeptanzrate um rund 16 Prozentpunkte niedriger als in der Kontrollgruppe, die keine derartigen Informationen erhielt. Etwas überraschend ist vor dem Hintergrund der mittlerweile seit vier Jahren existierenden nationalen CO2-Bepreisung, mit der fossile Kraft- und Brennstoffe Jahr für Jahr aus Klimaschutzgründen verteuert werden, dass sich eine absolute Mehrheit von 65,6% der Teilnehmenden gegen eine alljährliche Erhöhung der staatlichen Abgaben auf die Benzin- und Dieselpreise ausspricht. Ein nahezu ebenso großer Anteil der Befragten hält diese Maßnahme auch für ungerecht.

Suggested Citation

  • Eßer, Jana & Frondel, Manuel, 2024. "Akzeptanz von Energie- und Verkehrswende: Resultate des Sozialökologischen Panels für das Jahr 2022," RWI Materialien 167, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:rwimat:307133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/307133/1/1909888494.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Frondel & Christoph M. Schmidt & Colin Vance, 2014. "Revisiting Germanyùs solar cell promotion: An unfolding disaster," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 3-13.
    2. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frondel, Manuel & Sommer, Stephan, 2018. "Schwindende Akzeptanz für die Energiewende? Ergebnisse einer wiederholten Bürgerbefragung," RWI Materialien 124, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    2. Gabriele Ruiu & Giovanna Gonano, 2020. "Religious Barriers to the Diffusion of Same-sex Civil Unions in Italy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(6), pages 1185-1203, December.
    3. Wright, Austin L. & Sonin, Konstantin & Driscoll, Jesse & Wilson, Jarnickae, 2020. "Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 544-554.
    4. Guido de Blasio & Daniela Vuri, 2019. "Effects of the Joint Custody Law in Italy," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 479-514, September.
    5. Graves Jennifer & McMullen Steven & Rouse Kathryn, 2018. "Teacher Turnover, Composition and Qualifications in the Year-Round School Setting," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Alston Lee J. & Mueller Bernardo, 2018. "Priests, Conflicts and Property Rights: the Impacts on Tenancy and Land Use in Brazil," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, June.
    7. S Anukriti & Catalina Herrera‐Almanza & Praveen K. Pathak & Mahesh Karra, 2020. "Curse of the Mummy‐ji: The Influence of Mothers‐in‐Law on Women in India†," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1328-1351, October.
    8. Ellison, Richard B. & Ellison, Adrian B. & Greaves, Stephen P. & Sampaio, Breno, 2017. "Electronic ticketing systems as a mechanism for travel behaviour change? Evidence from Sydney’s Opal card," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 80-93.
    9. Cruzatti C., John & Bjørnskov, Christian & Sáenz de Viteri, Andrea & Cruzatti, Christian, 2024. "Geography, development, and power: Parliament leaders and local clientelism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Yusuke Matsuki, 2016. "A Distribution-Free Test of Monotonicity with an Application to Auctions," Working Papers e110, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    11. Peppel-Srebrny, Jemima, 2021. "Not all government budget deficits are created equal: Evidence from advanced economies' sovereign bond markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Eichengreen, Barry & Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Saka, Orkun, 2021. "Revenge of the experts: Will COVID-19 renew or diminish public trust in science?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Shvartsman, Elena & Beckmann, Michael, 2015. "Stressed by your job: What is the role of personnel policy?," Working papers 2015/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    14. MacDonald, Peter, 2013. "Labour substitution and the scope for military outsourcing," MPRA Paper 46688, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Matteo Migheli, 2021. "Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10576-10600, July.
    16. Yuyang Li & Jiahui Li & Xinjie Li & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Participation in Digital Supply and Marketing Promote Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Production Technologies?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
    18. Laurent Didier, 2017. "South-South Trade and Geographical Diversification of Intra-SSA Trade: Evidence from BRICs," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 139-154, June.
    19. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.
    20. Bono, Pierre-Henri & David, Quentin & Desbordes, Rodolphe & Py, Loriane, 2022. "Metro infrastructure and metropolitan attractiveness," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    City-Maut; randomisiertes Kontrollexperiment; Wärmewende;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:rwimat:307133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwiesde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.