IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/qmsrps/271255.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Artificial Intelligence (Ai)-Readiness and Adoption Framework for Agritech Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Issa, Helmi
  • Jabbouri, Rachid
  • Palmer, Mark

Abstract

With the recent technological advancements, empowered by the self-learning capabilities of algorithms, and the increasing power of machines computation, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven technologies have become more pervasive and performant, less costly, and more effective at addressing and solving prevailing business problems. In this respect, firms operating in the AgriTech sector make no exception and are indeed being significantly impacted by AI-driven technologies and systems. We argue in this paper that given the unique characteristics of AI technologies and emerging challenges and aspirations of the AgriTech sector, there is a need for re-examining traditional theorizations of technology adoption and readiness within AgriTech firms. Specifically, we develop a comprehensive AI readiness and adoption empirical framework that delineates the determinants of AI readiness and uncovers a set of key strategic components that can help AgriTech firms better manage their readiness process for AI adoption. We employ a mixed-methods approach and collect through 236 e-surveys and 25 interviews from one of the most influential conferences in the AgriTech field. Our findings have implications for research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Issa, Helmi & Jabbouri, Rachid & Palmer, Mark, 2021. "An Artificial Intelligence (Ai)-Readiness and Adoption Framework for Agritech Firms," QBS Working Paper Series 271255, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:qmsrps:271255
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3971188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/271255/1/qms-rp2021-3971188.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2139/ssrn.3971188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Bolander, 2019. "What do we loose when machines take the decisions?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 849-867, December.
    2. Deighton, John & Kornfeld, Leora, 2009. "Interactivity's Unanticipated Consequences for Marketers and Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-10.
    3. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 2001. "Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 198-213, April.
    4. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Dubey, Rameshwar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Childe, Stephen J. & Hazen, Benjamin & Akter, Shahriar, 2017. "Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 308-317.
    5. Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2019. "Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Deepak Pandit & Maheshkumar P. Joshi & Rajen K. Gupta & Arun Sahay, 2017. "Disruptive innovation through a dynamic capabilities lens: an exploration of the auto component sector in India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 109-130.
    7. Anna Trunk & Hendrik Birkel & Evi Hartmann, 2020. "On the current state of combining human and artificial intelligence for strategic organizational decision making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 875-919, November.
    8. Marc Gruber & Florian Heinemann & Malte Brettel & Stephan Hungeling, 2010. "Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(12), pages 1337-1356, December.
    9. Pumplun, Luisa & Tauchert, Christoph & Heidt, Margareta, 2019. "A New Organizational Chassis for Artificial Intelligence - Exploring Organizational Readiness Factors," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112582, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Post-Print hal-03741843, HAL.
    11. Christian Janiesch & Marcus Fischer & Axel Winkelmann & Valentin Nentwich, 2019. "Specifying autonomy in the Internet of Things: the autonomy model and notation," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-194, March.
    12. Daniel Schallmo & Christopher A. Williams & Luke Boardman, 2017. "Digital Transformation Of Business Models — Best Practice, Enablers, And Roadmap," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Issa, Helmi & Jabbouri, Rachid & Palmer, Mark, 2022. "An artificial intelligence (AI)-readiness and adoption framework for AgriTech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Aydiner, Arafat Salih & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Bayraktar, Erkan & Zaim, Selim & Delen, Dursun, 2019. "Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 228-237.
    3. Dean A. Shepherd & Marc Gruber, 2021. "The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 967-998, September.
    4. Thomas Reverdy, 2006. "ISO 14001 implementation: translation process and organizational change," Post-Print halshs-00134707, HAL.
    5. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    6. Mateos-Garcia, Juan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2008. "The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 333-344, December.
    7. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Big data value and financial performance: an empirical investigation [Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data]," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    8. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    9. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    10. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Carmen Gerea & Valeria Herskovic & María Fernanda Rodríguez & Gabriela Cajamarca & Rodrigo Gajardo, 2023. "New Paths in Small Manufacturing: How is Digital Transformation Shaping Collaboration Between Designers and Craftspeople?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    12. Paola Rovelli & Vincenzo Butticè, 2020. "On the organizational design of entrepreneurial ventures: the configurations of the entrepreneurial team," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(2), pages 243-269, June.
    13. Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2017. "Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 261-272.
    14. Valle, Sandra & García, Francisco & Avella, Lucía, 2015. "Offshoring Intermediate Manufacturing: Boost or Hindrance to Firm Innovation?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 117-134.
    15. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. O. Oyediran & A. Omoshule & Sanjay Misra & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius, 2019. "Attitude of mobile telecommunication subscribers towards sim card registration in Lagos State, Southwestern Nigeria," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 783-791, August.
    17. Pan Liu & Shu-ping Yi, 2018. "Investment decision-making and coordination of a three-stage supply chain considering Data Company in the Big Data era," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 255-271, November.
    18. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Edoardo Mollona & Andrea Marcozzi, 2009. "Self-emerging coordination mechanisms for knowledge integration processes," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 8(2), pages 223-241, December.
    20. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:qmsrps:271255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dequbuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.