IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die transnationale Ordnung globalisierter Finanzmärkte: Was lehrt uns die Krise?


  • Mayntz, Renate


In diesem Papier geht es nicht um die voraussichtliche künftige Ordnung der globalen Finanzmärkte nach der Krise, sondern um die Frage, warum der Reformprozess zeitlich, sachlich und sozial hinter dem zurückbleibt, was 2009 von Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit einhellig für notwendig gehalten wurde. Eine Antwort auf diese Frage verlangt eine prozessorientierte Perspektive, in deren Zentrum die interaktive Interdependenz zwischen Regulierern und Regulierten, der Beschaffenheit der Regelungsstruktur und der Beschaffenheit des Regelungsfeldes steht. Prozesse, an denen Marktakteure und politische Akteure beteiligt sind, lassen sich theoretisch nicht erklären, wenn man das Augenmerk entweder auf die Wirtschaft oder auf die Politik lenkt. Der von der Finanzmarktkrise ausgelöste Prozess institutionellen Wandels verlangt vielmehr einen Brückenschlag zwischen bislang getrennten Forschungslinien der Wirtschaftssoziologie und der politischen Theorie.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayntz, Renate, 2010. "Die transnationale Ordnung globalisierter Finanzmärkte: Was lehrt uns die Krise?," MPIfG Working Paper 10/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:108

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2009. "Varieties of Crises and Their Dates," Introductory Chapters,in: This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly Princeton University Press.
    2. Reinhart, Karmen & Rogoff, Kenneth, 2009. ""This time is different": panorama of eight centuries of financial crises," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 77-114, March.
    3. Mommsen, Hans, 2009. "Changing Historical Perspectives on the Nazi Dictatorship," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(01), pages 73-80, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.