IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fifore/12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Qualität der öffentlichen Finanzen – Anwendung des Ansatzes der EU-Kommission auf Deutschland
[The Quality of Public Finances – Assessment and exemplary application of the proposed approach by the European Commission]

Author

Listed:
  • Thöne, Michael
  • Dobroschke, Stephan

Abstract

Gegenstand der vorliegenden Studie ist eine Überprüfung des von der EU-Kommission vorgeschlagenen Ansatzes zur indikatorbasierten Messung der Qualität öffentlicher Finanzen am Fallbeispiel Deutschland. Auf Basis grundlegender Anforderungen an ein solches Instrument wird die Darstellung der Ausgaben-, der Einnahmendimension sowie der Dimension "Fiscal Governance" einer näheren Analyse unterzogen. Es zeigt sich, dass der Versuch einer indikatorbasierten, qualitativen Bewertung öffentlicher Finanzen zwar wünschenswert und in einzelnen Teilbereichen machbar, im Gesamtkontext - auch vor dem Hintergrund einer geplanten Synthese unterschiedlicher Teilindikatoren zu "synthetischen Indikatoren" - jedoch mit Problemen verbunden ist. Während die indikatorbasierte Abbildung einzelner Teilbereiche durchaus belastbare Ergebnisse erzielen kann, könnte die mangelnde Berücksichtigung vielschichtiger und z. T. endogener Wirkungszusammenhänge - etwa in der Einnahmendimension - zu Verfälschungen in der Länderbewertung führen. In Anbetracht struktureller Schwächen synthetischer Indikatoren könnte eine Weiterentwicklung darin liegen, einzelne und zentrale Indikatoren in den Vordergrund zu rücken - nicht allerdings, um sie an die Stelle eines unverzichtbaren umfassenden und disaggregierten Ansatzes zu stellen.

Suggested Citation

  • Thöne, Michael & Dobroschke, Stephan, 2010. "Qualität der öffentlichen Finanzen – Anwendung des Ansatzes der EU-Kommission auf Deutschland [The Quality of Public Finances – Assessment and exemplary application of the proposed approach by the ," FiFo Reports - FiFo-Berichte 12, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fifore:12
    Note: Forschungsauftrag Nr. 10/08 des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/221889/1/fifo-berichte-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrike Mandl & Adriaan Dierx & Fabienne Ilzkovitz, 2008. "The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 301, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    2. Ray,Subhash C., 2012. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107405264.
    3. Antonio Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2010. "Public sector efficiency: evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(17), pages 2147-2164.
    4. Lee, Young & Gordon, Roger H., 2005. "Tax structure and economic growth," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 1027-1043, June.
    5. Alfred Kleinknecht, 1993. "Why Do We Need New Innovation Output Indicators? An Introduction," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Alfred Kleinknecht & Donald Bain (ed.), New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement, chapter 1, pages 1-9, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Afonso, Antonio & St. Aubyn, Miguel, 2006. "Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 476-491, May.
    7. António Afonso & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2006. "Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: a DEA Approach with Non-discretionary Inputs," Working Papers Department of Economics 2006/33, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    8. Ms. Victoria Gunnarsson & Stéphane Carcillo & Marijn Verhoeven, 2007. "Education and Health in G7 Countries: Achieving Better Outcomes with Less Spending," IMF Working Papers 2007/263, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Office of Health Economics, 2007. "The Economics of Health Care," For School 001490, Office of Health Economics.
    10. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2005. "Public sector efficiency: An international comparison," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 321-347, June.
    11. Unto Häkkinen & Isabelle Joumard, 2007. "Cross-Country Analysis of Efficiency in OECD Health Care Sectors: Options for Research," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 554, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María del Rocío Moreno-Enguix & Laura Vanesa Lorente-Bayona & Ester Gras-Gil, 2019. "Social and Political Factors Affect the Index of Public Management Efficiency: A Cross-Country Panel Data Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 299-313, July.
    2. Aristovnik, Aleksander & Obadić, Alka, 2014. "Measuring relative efficiency of secondary education in selected EU and OECD countries: the case of Slovenia and Croatia," MPRA Paper 63936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Mihai MutaÅŸcu & Marius MiloÅŸ, 2009. "Optimal Size Of Government Spending. The Case Of European Union Member States," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-45.
    4. Aleksander Aristovnik, 2013. "Relative Efficiency of Education Expenditures in Eastern Europe: A Non-parametric Approach," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(3), pages 1-4, June.
    5. Azar Dufrechou, Paola, 2016. "The efficiency of public education spending in Latin America: A comparison to high-income countries," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 188-203.
    6. Aleksander Aristovnik, 2014. "Relative Efficiency Of Primary Education: An International Comparison," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 8(1), pages 17-24.
    7. Asem Alshami, 2016. "Theoretical Evidences Regarding Methodologies Of Calculating Efficiency Of Public Sector," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 34(4), pages 88-94.
    8. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2010. "Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(3), pages 367-389, September.
    9. Christine Mayrhuber & Matthias Firgo & Hans Pitlik & Alois Guger & Ewald Walterskirchen, 2018. "Sozialstaat und Standortqualität," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61006, April.
    10. Iyad Dhaoui, 2019. "Healthcare system efficiency and its determinants: A two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) from MENA countries," Working Papers 1320, Economic Research Forum, revised 21 Aug 2019.
    11. Christl, Michael & Köppl-Turyna, Monika & Kucsera, Dénes, 2018. "Public sector efficiency in Europe: Long-run trends, recent developments and determinants," Working Papers 14, Agenda Austria.
    12. Ant—nio Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2023. "The size of government," Chapters, in: António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio (ed.), Handbook on Public Sector Efficiency, chapter 1, pages 6-31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Gaspar, Ví­tor & Afonso, António, 2006. "Excess burden and the cost of inefficiency in public services provision," Working Paper Series 601, European Central Bank.
    14. António Afonso & Ana Venâncio, 2020. "Local territorial reform and regional spending efficiency," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 888-910, November.
    15. Tumaniants, Karen A. (Туманянц, Карэн) & Sesina, Julia E. (Сесина, Юлия), 2017. "Social Expenditures of Russian Regions in Terms of “Input-Output” [Расходы На Социальную Политику Российских Регионов В Координатах «Затраты — Результат»]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 128-149, October.
    16. Francesco Porcelli, 2014. "Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 221-251, August.
    17. Djedje Hermann Yohou, 2015. "In Search of Fiscal Space in Africa: The Role of the Quality of Government Spending," CERDI Working papers halshs-01222812, HAL.
    18. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2023. "Government Spending and Tax Revenue Decentralization and Public Sector Efficiency: Do Natural Disasters matter?," Working Papers REM 2023/0271, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    19. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht, 2019. "How “Big” Should Government Be?," Working Papers REM 2019/78, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    20. Aristovnik, Aleksander, 2012. "The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis," MPRA Paper 39805, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Qualität öffentlicher Finanzen; Wachstumswirksamkeit; Qualitätsindikator; Quality of public finances; growth effects; quality indicator;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fifore:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fikoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.