IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wrk/warwec/1602.html

Social Media Advertising Loads as Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George

    (University of Chicago,)

  • Jimenez-Duran, Rafael

    (Bocconi University, IGIER, Stigler Center, CESifo, and CEPR)

  • Simonov, Andrey

    (Columbia University and CEPR)

  • Mateusz Stalinsk, Mateusz

    (University of Warwick and CAGE)

Abstract

Most digital platforms are funded through advertising rather than direct payments. Why? We argue that three main factors could explain this prevalence: users are more sensitive to monetary prices than to ad loads, microtargeting improves the match quality between users and ads, and platforms can personalize ad loads and thus price discriminate. We conduct a field experiment on Facebook with 1,810 users who install a browser extension that (i) hides nearly all ads or (ii) replaces microtargeted ads with untargeted ones. We find that hiding 82% of ads increases time on the platform by only 6%, showing that users are highly insensitive to ad loads. Removing targeting sharply reduces ad clicks and long-run engagement, indicating that targeting increases the match quality between users and ads. Finally, two-thirds of ad-load variation occurs across users, consistent with ad-load discrimination. Counterfactual simulations indicate that an ad-funded model performs at least as well as a subscription model i terms of profits and delivers higher consumer surplus. The key mechanism is that users are much less sensitive to ad loads than to monetary prices, making advertising a relatively efficient revenue source.

Suggested Citation

  • Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jimenez-Duran, Rafael & Simonov, Andrey & Mateusz Stalinsk, Mateusz, 2026. "Social Media Advertising Loads as Prices," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1602, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/2026/twerp_1602-stalinski.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lancelot de Frahan & Joseph Goodman & Justin Holz & John List & Evan McKay & Niall McMenamin & Magne Mogstad & Sally Sadoff & Hal Sider, 2025. "Consumer Demand and Market Competition with Time-Intensive Goods," Framed Field Experiments 00828, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. Justin Katz & Hunt Allcott, 2025. "Digital Media Mergers: Theory and Application to Facebook-Instagram," NBER Working Papers 34028, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Avi Goldfarb & Verina F. Que, 2023. "The Economics of Digital Privacy," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 267-286, September.
    4. Guy Aridor & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Ro'ee Levy & Lena Song, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 1422-1474, December.
    5. Simon P. Anderson & André de Palma, 2012. "Competition for attention in the Information (overload) Age," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(1), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2005. "Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(4), pages 947-972.
    7. Erik Brynjolfsson & Avinash Collis & Daniel Deisenroth & Haritz Garro & Daley Kutzman & Asad Liaqat & Nils Wernerfelt, 2025. "The Consumer Welfare Effects of Online Ads: Evidence from a Nine-Year Experiment," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 447-462, December.
    8. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic content and user engagement on social media: Evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 359, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    9. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro & Frank Yang & Ali Yurukoglu, 2024. "Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(2), pages 500-533, February.
    10. Ozan Candogan & Kostas Bimpikis & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2012. "Optimal Pricing in Networks with Externalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 883-905, August.
    11. Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2008. "A Two-Sided, Empirical Model of Television Advertising and Viewing Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 356-378, 05-06.
    12. Elena Argentesi & Paolo Buccirossi & Emilio Calvano & Tomaso Duso & Alessia Marrazzo & Salvatore Nava, 2021. "Merger Policy in Digital Markets: An Ex Post Assessment†," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 95-140.
    13. Daron Acemoglu & Daniel Huttenlocher & Asuman Ozdaglar & James Siderius, 2024. "Online Business Models, Digital Ads, and User Welfare," NBER Working Papers 33017, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 741, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    15. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    16. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media : Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1543, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    17. Nils Wernerfelt & Anna Tuchman & Bradley T. Shapiro & Robert Moakler, 2025. "Estimating the Value of Offsite Tracking Data to Advertisers: Evidence from Meta," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 268-286, March.
    18. Guy Aridor, 2025. "Measuring Substitution Patterns in the Attention Economy: An Experimental Approach," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 56(3), pages 302-324, September.
    19. Susan Athey & Emilio Calvano & Joshua S. Gans, 2018. "The Impact of Consumer Multi-homing on Advertising Markets and Media Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1574-1590, April.
    20. Doruk Cengiz & Arindrajit Dube & Attila Lindner & Ben Zipperer, 2019. "The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1405-1454.
    21. Ali Goli & Jason Huang & David Reiley & Nickolai M. Riabov, 2025. "Measuring consumer sensitivity to audio advertising: a long-run field experiment on Pandora internet radio," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 347-377, September.
    22. Yi Liu & Pinar Yildirim & Z. John Zhang, 2022. "Implications of Revenue Models and Technology for Content Moderation Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 831-847, July.
    23. Leonardo Bursztyn & Benjamin Handel & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Christopher Roth, 2025. "When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(12), pages 4105-4136, December.
    24. Ali Goli & David H. Reiley & Hongkai Zhang, 2025. "Personalizing Ad Load to Optimize Subscription and Ad Revenues: Product Strategies Constructed from Experiments on Pandora," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 327-352, March.
    25. Jacques Simon Song & Georges Ngnouwal Eloundou & Fabrice Bitoto Ewolo & Blaise Ondoua Beyene, 2024. "Does Social Media Contribute to Economic Growth?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8349-8389, June.
    26. Jeffrey R Kling & Jeffrey B Liebman & Lawrence F Katz, 2007. "Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 83-119, January.
    27. Emilio Calvano & Michele Polo, 2020. "Strategic Differentiation by Business Models: Free-To-Air and Pay-TV," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(625), pages 50-64.
    28. Argentesi, Elena & Buccirossi, Paolo & Calvano, Emilio & Duso, Tomaso & Marrazzo, Alessia & Nava, Salvatore, 2021. "Merger Policy in Digital Markets: An Ex Post Assessment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 95-140.
    29. Guy Aridor & Yeon‐Koo Che & Tobias Salz, 2023. "The effect of privacy regulation on the data industry: empirical evidence from GDPR," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(4), pages 695-730, December.
    30. George Beknazar-Yuzbashev & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Mateusz Stalinski, 2024. "A Model of Harmful Yet Engaging Content on Social Media," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 114, pages 678-683, May.
    31. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    32. George Beknazar-Yuzbashev & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Jesse McCrosky & Mateusz Stalinski, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11644, CESifo.
    33. Jean-Pierre Dubé & John G. Lynch & Dirk Bergemann & Mert Demirer & Avi Goldfarb & Garrett Johnson & Anja Lambrecht & Tesary Lin & Anna Tuchman & Catherine Tucker, 2025. "Frontiers: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Privacy Regulation for Consumer Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 975-984, September.
    34. Tesary Lin, 2022. "Valuing Intrinsic and Instrumental Preferences for Privacy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 663-681, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & Simonov, Andrey & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2026. "Social Media Advertising Loads as Prices," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 792, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Gars, Jared & Stalinski, Mateusz & Tjernstrom, Emilia, 2025. "Incentivizing Engagement : Experimental Evidence on Journalist Performance Pay," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1570, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    3. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Gars, Jared & Stalinski, Mateusz & Tjernström, Emilia, 2025. "Incentivizing Engagement: Experimental Evidence on Journalist Performance Pay," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 763, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Ivan Rendo, 2025. "Excessive Content Moderation," Working Papers 25-02, NET Institute.
    5. Felix Chopra & Ingar Haaland & Fabian Roeben & Christopher Roth & Vanessa Sticher, 2025. "News Customization with AI," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 372, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    6. Ying Bao & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Spiral of Silence: How Neutral Moderation Polarizes Content Creation," Papers 2511.19680, arXiv.org.
    7. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 741, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    8. Guy Aridor & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Ro'ee Levy & Lena Song, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 1422-1474, December.
    9. George Beknazar-Yuzbashev & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Jesse McCrosky & Mateusz Stalinski, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11644, CESifo.
    10. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic content and user engagement on social media: Evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 359, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    11. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media : Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1543, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    12. Christian Bach & Robert Edwards & Christian Jaag, 2023. "Postal Platform Pricing with Limited Consumer Attention," Working Papers 202318, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    13. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    14. repec:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_698 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ying Bao & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Beyond Takedowns: How Moderation Shapes What Gets Created," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 47-51, October.
    16. Guy Aridor & Yeon-Koo Che & Brett Hollenbeck & Maximilian Kaiser & Daniel McCarthy, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Privacy Regulation on E-Commerce Firms: Evidence from Apple’s App Tracking Transparency," CESifo Working Paper Series 10928, CESifo.
    17. Di Lizia, Adam & Shevchenko, Lily, 2026. "Can hate speech be banned online? The effects of shutting down toxic forums on Reddit," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 790, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    18. Leonardo Bursztyn & Matthew Gentzkow & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Aaron Leonard & Filip Milojević & Christopher Roth, 2025. "Measuring Markets for Network Goods," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 363, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Orrenius, Johan, 2026. "What is the Value of Attention? Supply and Demand Estimation of Attention in a Mobile App Setting," Working Paper Series 1550, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    20. Sergei Guriev & Nikita Melnikov & Joana Escórcio Silva & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2025. "Mobile Broadband Accountability, Populism, and Misinformation," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 21-25, October.
    21. Marina Rizzi & Mateusz Stalinski, 2025. "Toxic Content and Engagement," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 58-62, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sheila Kiggins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.