IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa03p161.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Regional Systems of Innovation - Initial Results from the Case of Southeast-Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Thorsten Bohn

Abstract

Within innovation systems, it is not only the creation of knowledge that counts but the flow of such knowledge from the producer to the user. Therefore, a huge national knowledge base does not necessarily guarantee intensive innovation activities. Instead, the distribution power within national innovation systems is important. In the process of distributing knowledge that is relevant for innovations, different actors can be identified. Besides organisations that have been put up by (regional) governments like technology transfer institutes, technology parks etc., one major group of actors are so called knowledge intensive business services (KIBS). It is believed that they hold a decisive role in the creation and diffusion of knowledge within regional systems of innovation, since they can take up a bridging function between knowledge suppliers and knowledge users. Research so far has focused mainly on the role of so-called technology-based KIBS for high-tech industries (e.g. ICT). The role and significance of non-technology KIBS (like business consulting, legal services etc.) on the other hand has been neglected, although they can have a decisive effect on the strategical direction of innovations. Since most of the KIBS-research has focused on KIBS in highly developed innovation systems and metropolitan areas, there is not very much known about the role and significance of KIBS in more peripherical and rural regions, although it is an interesting question if KIBS in these regions play the same role in their clients innovation processes and if they are able to introduce new knowledge from outside the regions. The proposed paper deals with the role and significance of knowledge intensive business services in the creation and diffusion of knowledge and their role in the development of peripherical regions. It sheds some light on the changing environment for KIBS and the change in the structure of KIBS in peripherical regions. Furthermore, it deals with the specific role of KIBS for the transfer of knowledge from outside the region and their ability to link sources of knowledge from different industries. The proposed paper is based on the systems of innovation approach. It uses data obtained by a standardised questionnaire that was sent to all relevant KIBS firms in Southeast-Finland during 2002. Furthermore, the results of about 50 interviews with KIBS, the clients of KIBS and relevant institutional actors in Southeast-Finland are being used. Based on the previously mentioned data, the paper suggests that the dichitomy between technology-KIBS and non-technology KIBS is not appropriate in many cases, since most KIBS firms provide a mixture of services. The paper suggests that KIBS hold an important position for the diffusion of knowledge that is needed for innovations even in more or less low-tech industries. This is especially true for knowledge that comes from outside the region. The paper also shows the relative importance of different channels for the distribution of knowledge within the innovation system. However, the paper suggests that for the observed region the power of KIBS in linking different industries is rather limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Thorsten Bohn, 2003. "Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Regional Systems of Innovation - Initial Results from the Case of Southeast-Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa03p161, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa03p161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/161.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dllek Cetindamar Kakaomerlioglu & Bo Carlsson, 1999. "Manufacturing In Decline? A Matter Of Definition," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 175-196.
    2. Johan Hauknes, "undated". "Innovation in the Service Economy," STEP Report series 199607, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    3. Freeman, Chris, 1995. "The 'National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 5-24, February.
    4. Johan Hauknes, "undated". "Services in Innovation – Innovation in Services," STEP Report series 199813, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    5. Leiponen, Aija, . "Knowledge Services in the Innovation System," ETLA B, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, number 185.
    6. Dirk Czarnitzki & Alfred Spielkamp, 2003. "Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Muller, Emmanuel & Zenker, Andrea, 2001. "Business services as actors of knowledge transformation and diffusion: some empirical findings on the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R2/2001, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:gdk:wpaper:7 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stahlecker, Thomas & Koch, Andreas, 2004. "On the significance of economic structure and regional innovation systems for the foundation of knowledge-intensive business services," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2004, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    2. Claudio Farina & Brigitte Preissl, 2000. "Research and Technology Organisations in National Systems of Innovation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 221, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Maria de Lurdes Calisto & Soumodip Sarkar, 2017. "Innovation and corporate entrepreneurship in service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(3), pages 581-600, September.
    4. Jon Sundbo & Robert Johnston & Jan Mattsson & Bruce Millett, 2001. "Innovation in service internationalization: the crucial role of the frantrepreneur," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 247-267, July.
    5. Nicoletta Corrocher & Lucia Cusmano & Andrea Morrison, 2009. "Modes of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services evidence from Lombardy," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 173-196, April.
    6. Martin Andersson & Florian Noseleit, 2011. "Start-ups and employment dynamics within and across sectors," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 461-483, May.
    7. Michael Wyrwich, 2011. "Knowledge intensive Entrepreneurship across regions: Makes being a new industry a difference?," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1711, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Harald Strotmann & Andreas Koch, 2005. "The Impact of Functional Integration and Spatial Proximity on the Post-entry Performance of Knowledge Intensive Business Service Firms," IAW Discussion Papers 18, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW).
    9. Fernandes, Cristina & Ferreira, João, 2011. "Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Intensive Business Services: An Empirical Study," MPRA Paper 34751, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Zoltán Bujdosó & János Pénzes & Lóránt Dávid & Szilárd Madaras, 2016. "The Spatial Pattern of KIBS and their Relations with the Territorial Development in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(41), pages 1-73, February.
    11. Philip Cooke, 2002. "Biotechnology Clusters as Regional, Sectoral Innovation Systems," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 8-37, January.
    12. Mark Tomlinson, 2000. "Innovation surveys: A researcher's perspective," DRUID Working Papers 00-9, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    13. Aija Leiponen, 2005. "Organization of Knowledge and Innovation: The Case of Finnish Business Services," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 185-203.
    14. Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh & Giroud, Axèle & Andersson, Ulf, 2014. "The interplay of networking activities and internal knowledge actions for subsidiary influence within MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 122-131.
    15. Chulok Alexander, 2021. "Applying blended foresight methods for revealing incentives and future strategies of key national innovation system players," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 160-173, December.
    16. Roberts, Rhonda, 1998. "Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 159-175, June.
    17. Reis, Anabela & Heitor, Manuel & Amaral, Miguel & Mendonça, Joana, 2016. "Revisiting industrial policy: Lessons learned from the establishment of an automotive OEM in Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 195-205.
    18. Andreas Koch & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Determinants of Innovative Activity in Newly Founded Knowledge Intensive Business Service Firms," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Michael Fritsch & Juergen Schmude (ed.), Entrepreneurship in the Region, chapter 10, pages 195-224, Springer.
    19. Maria JOSE SILVA & Gastão SOUSA & Jacinta MOREIRA & Jorge SIMÕES, 2011. "Innovation Activities in the Service Sector: Empirical Evidence from Portuguese Firms," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 1(6), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Ramani, Shyama V. & Chowdhury, Nupur & Coronini, Roger & Reid, Susan, 2011. "On India's plunge into Nanotechnology: What are good ways to catch-up?," MERIT Working Papers 2011-020, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Socio-Economics of Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa03p161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.