IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/istudy/1999_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development and Prospects of the Transport Equipment Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Access to wiiw Industrial Database In Central and Eastern Europe, as in most economies, the transport equipment sector plays a major role in manufacturing, due to its size and foreign trade volume as well as its links with the rest of the economy. It is considered a medium-high technology industry and belongs to the most globalized segments of manufacturing world-wide. In the Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs), the transport equipment sector is one of the fastest growing sectors, characterized by extraordinary production and export growth and supported by a massive inflow of foreign direct investment. Part One of the study investigates the development and prospects of the transport equipment sector in the following countries - Bulgaria - Czech Republic - Hungary - Poland - Romania - Slovakia - Slovenia In size, the transport equipment sector emerged as a major player in total manufacturing of the more advanced CEECs today and contributes between 9% and 12% of output, with the Czech Republic and Hungary having the largest shares of the CEECs analysed. Only in Romania and Bulgaria, is the sector of minor importance. When compared to countries of Western Europe, the CEECs are in the middle of the range, having smaller transport equipment shares than the more advanced EU countries but larger ones than the less advanced countries. In the first phase of transition, which lasted from 1989 to around 1992, the output of the transport equipment sector declined along with the larger economy and was even more affected than total manufacturing. From 1993 on, the performance of the sector improved and it became one of the most successful segments of manufacturing, due to growing domestic demand and the inflow of foreign investment in particular. The Hungarian and Polish transport equipment sectors emerged as the regional growth leaders, while the Slovenian one continued to decline. As an employer, the transport equipment sector is of middle importance and employment shares range between 3% in Bulgaria and 9% in Romania today. Output shares were decisively larger than employment shares in all countries in 1997, except in Bulgaria and Romania, where production is still more labour-intensive. As is typical for all CEECs and all sectors of manufacturing, wages, productivity and unit labour costs in the transport equipment sector were and are generally much lower than in West European countries, for which we used Austria as a point of reference. Only in Hungary, did the sector's productivity surpass the Austrian level in 1997. From 1993 to 1997, wages and productivity rose in all countries. As the productivity increase was larger than the wage increase, unit labour costs declined in most countries but increased in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. In general however, unit labour costs remain at a much lower level than in Austria. Ranges for CEECs' unit labour costs in the transport equipment sector as a percentage of the Austrian level Bulgaria 23% - 51% Czech Republic 22% - 33% Hungary 12% - 21% Romania 17% - 57% Slovakia 17% - 27% Slovenia 38% - 45% Poland 29% - 40% (The lower range is calculated at purchasing power parities (PPP) for GDP, the upper range at PPP for fixed capital formation; figures are from 1997, with the exception of the Austrian level which is for 1996) In CEECs' manufacturing exports to the EU, the transport equipment sector holds a significant trade position in the more advanced CEECs, with shares ranging between 11% in Poland, 20% in Slovenia and Slovakia and 22% in Hungary. The sector is exceptionally export-oriented, shows a small revealed comparative advantage compared to total manufacturing and concentrates on exports of automotive products. In Romania and Bulgaria, on the other hand, the transport equipment sector has only a very small export share in total manufacturing. Other transport equipment products form a large part of their exports, leading to more unstable export structures over.

Suggested Citation

  • Doris Hanzl-Weiss, 1970. "Development and Prospects of the Transport Equipment Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries," wiiw Industry Study 1999_4, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
  • Handle: RePEc:wii:istudy:1999_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/development-and-prospects-of-the-transport-equipment-sector-in-the-central-and-eastern-european-countries-dlp-88.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Tulder, Rob & Ruigrok, Winifred, 1998. "European Cross-National Production Networks in the Auto Industry: Eastern Europe as the Low End of European Car Complex," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt35n5n451, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    2. André Sapir & Pierre Buigues & Alexis Jacquemin, 1995. "European policies on competition, trade and industry: conflict and complementaries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/8082, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Pierre Buigues & Alexis Jacquemin & André Sapir (ed.), 1995. "European Policies on Competition, Trade and Industry," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 719.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jackie Krafft, 1999. "Introduction," Post-Print hal-00212290, HAL.
    2. Antonella Forganni & Heidi Reed, 2019. "Circumvention of Trade Defence Measures and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 29-40, March.
    3. José J. Sempere Monerris & Rafael Moner Colonques & Amparo Urbano Salvador, 1999. "Strategic policy and international economic integration," Working Papers. Serie AD 1999-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    4. Gregor Van Der Beek & Larry Neal, 2004. "The Dilemma of Enlargement for the European Union's Regional Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 587-607, April.
    5. Lissowska, Maria, 2002. "East European prospective members of the European Union under globalisation pressure," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 395-399, December.
    6. Machiel Mulder & Victoria Shestalova & Gijsbert Zwart, 2006. "Liberalisation of European energy markets: challenges and policy options," CPB Document 138.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Soete, Luc & Verspagen, Bart & ter Weel, Bas, 2010. "Systems of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1159-1180, Elsevier.
    8. Török, Ádám, 1999. "A verseny- és a K+F-politika keresztútján. Bevezetés a csoportmentességi szabályozás elméletébe [At the crossroads of competition and R and D policy. Introduction to the theory of group-exemption r," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 491-506.
    9. Hallegatte, Stephane & Fay, Marianne & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2013. "Green industrial policies : when and how," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6677, The World Bank.
    10. Dinga, Marián & Münich, Daniel, 2010. "The impact of territorially concentrated FDI on local labor markets: Evidence from the Czech Republic," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 354-367, April.
    11. Stefan Dunin-Wasowicz & Michal Gorzynski & Richard Woodward, 2002. "Integration of Poland into EU Global Industrial Networks: The Evidence and the Main Challenges," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 16, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    12. Sarfati, Gilberto, 1998. "European industrial policy as a non-tariff barrier," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, May.
    13. Klaus E Meyer, 2000. "International Production Networks and Enterprise Transformation in Central Europe," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 42(1), pages 135-150, April.
    14. Loïc Lévi & Jean Jacques Nowak & Sylvain Petit & Hakim Hammadou, 2022. "Industrial legacy and hotel pricing: An application of spatial hedonic pricing analysis in Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(4), pages 870-898, June.
    15. Slavo Radosevic, 2002. "European Integration and Complementarities Driven Network Alignment: The Case of ABB in Central and Eastern Europe," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 12, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    16. Roderick Martin, 2002. "Politicized Managerial Capitalism: Enterprise Structures In Post‐Socialist Central And Eastern Europe," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 823-839, September.
    17. Peter Huber & Daniela Kletzan, 2001. "Unternehmenskooperationen mit den MOEL," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 74(2), pages 103-110, February.
    18. Michaël Freudenberg & Françoise Lemoine, 1999. "Central and Eastern European Countries in the International Division of Labour in Europe," Working Papers 1999-05, CEPII research center.
    19. Schwartz, Andrew & Zysman, John, 1998. "Reunifying Europe in an Emerging World Economy: Economic Heterogeneity, New Industrial Options, and Political Choices," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt60w702zc, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    20. Wilfried Altzinger & Peter Egger & Peter Huber & Kurt Kratena & Michael Pfaffermayr & Michael Wüger, 2000. "Teilprojekt 5: Transnationale Direktinvestitionen und Kooperationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19587, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:istudy:1999_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.