IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) : its effect on South Asia

  • Safadi, Raed
  • Yeats, Alexander
Registered author(s):

    Over the past three decades, free trade agreements were mostly a European phenomenon European Free Trade Agreement [EFTA], European Economic Community [EEC], and their regional arrangements). Recently, this phenomenon has reached the Americas and is growing. The authors show that free trade agreements now cover about half of world trade in manufactured goods and about 46 percent of total world trade. Free trade agreements discriminate in favor of member countries, so other exporters are naturally concerned about their trade being displaced. The authors try to quantify the adverse third-part effects of the recently concluded North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on the developing countries of South Asia. They find that because the NAFTA countries and South Asia export different types of goods,exports from South Asia will be displaced for only a narrow range of products (probably little more than 10 four-digit SITC groups). The sector most affected is textiles and clothing, given that the preferential removal of tariffs (in the 15 to 30 percent range) and MFA quotas could give Mexico a formidable competitive advantage in the U.S. market. But domestic supply constraints (Mexico seriously and consistently underutilizes its textile and clothing quotas), and NAFTA's domestic import content regulations should limit the amount of trade that Mexico may displace in these sectors. Using a partial equilibrium trade projection model developed by UNCTAD and the World Bank, the authors try to quantify the trade diversion South Asia could experience in North America as a result of NAFTA. The model focuses on NAFTA's short-run impact on South Asian trade. This study does not address dynamic long-run effects, such as changes in terms of trade, investment diversion, and externalities associated with the growth dividend. The results suggest that the total export decline could be about 1 percent, with projections for Bangladesh slightly higher (because textiles and clothing represent a higher-than-average share of Bangladesh's exports). The authors argue that successful completion of the Uruguay Round would considerably reduce South Asia's potential losses, as it would lower the preference margins that NAFTA could provide its member countries. To put the two events in perspective, the authors note that the trade gains South Asian countries could experience from successful completion of the Uruguay Round are about 100 times greater than the losses they might incur from NAFTA.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1119.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 31 Mar 1993
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1119
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433
    Phone: (202) 477-1234
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Baldwin, R E & Murray, Tracy, 1977. "MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits under the GSP," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 87(345), pages 30-46, March.
    2. Inotai, Andras, 1991. "Regional integration among developing countries, revisited," Policy Research Working Paper Series 643, The World Bank.
    3. Erzan, Refik & Yeats, Alexander, 1992. "Free trade agreements with the United States : what's in it for Latin America?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 827, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.