IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11046.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender Bias, Citizen Participation, and AI

Author

Listed:
  • Cuesta Leiva, Jose Antonio
  • Pecorari, Natalia

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of gender bias in artificial intelligence–driven analyses of citizen participation, using data from the 2023 Latinobarómetro Survey. The paper proposes that gender bias—whether societal, data driven, or algorithmic—significantly affects civic engagement. Using machine learning, particularly decision trees, the analysis explores how self-reported societal bias (machismo norms) interacts with personal characteristics and circumstances to shape civic participation. The findings show that individuals with reportedly low levels of gender bias, who express political interest, have high levels of education, and align with left-wing views, are more likely to participate. The paper also explores different strategies to mitigate gender bias in both the data and the algorithms, demonstrating that gender bias remains a persistent factor even after applying corrective measures. Notably, lower machismo thresholds are required for participation in more egalitarian societies, with men needing to exhibit especially low machismo levels. Ultimately, the findings emphasize the importance of integrated strategies to tackle gender bias and increase participation, offering a framework for future studies to expand on nonlinear and complex social dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuesta Leiva, Jose Antonio & Pecorari, Natalia, 2025. "Gender Bias, Citizen Participation, and AI," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11046, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099909401272535729/pdf/IDU-758c3cc4-f5be-4ea5-9e4d-6a2c1334c916.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fajardo Heyward,Paola Carolina & Cuesta Leiva,Jose Antonio, 2023. "Assessing the Success of National Human Rights Action Plans through a Political Economy Lens : The Case of Chile," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10578, The World Bank.
    2. Henrik Kleven & Camille Landais & Johanna Posch & Andreas Steinhauer & Josef Zweimüller, 2019. "Child Penalties across Countries: Evidence and Explanations," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 122-126, May.
    3. Manjul Gupta & Carlos M. Parra & Denis Dennehy, 2022. "Questioning Racial and Gender Bias in AI-based Recommendations: Do Espoused National Cultural Values Matter?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1465-1481, October.
    4. Louis Guttman, 1954. "Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(2), pages 149-161, June.
    5. Natalia Pecorari & Jose Cuesta, 2024. "Citizen Participation and Political Trust in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Machine Learning Approach," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1227-1252, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GUO-FITOUSSI, Liang, 2013. "A Comparison of the Finite Sample Properties of Selection Rules of Factor Numbers in Large Datasets," MPRA Paper 50005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. World Bank & The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2024. "Albania - Country Gender Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 41900, The World Bank Group.
    3. Louis Guttman, 1955. "A generalized simplex for factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 20(3), pages 173-192, September.
    4. Gabrielle Pepin, 2025. "What Is the Value of the Child and Dependent Care Credit?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 115, pages 120-125, May.
    5. Jones, Kelly & Wilcher, Britni, 2024. "Reducing maternal labor market detachment: A role for paid family leave," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Simen Markussen & Marte Strøm, 2022. "Children and labor market outcomes: separating the effects of the first three children," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 135-167, January.
    7. Pelin Akyol & Zeynep Yılmaz, 2024. "Effects of Grandmothers' Proximity on Mothers' Labour Force Participation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(5), pages 1122-1162, October.
    8. Gerlinde Mauerer & Eva-Maria Schmidt, 2019. "Parents’ Strategies in Dealing with Constructions of Gendered Responsibilities at Their Workplaces," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Josep Amer-Mestre and Agnès Charpin, 2022. "Gender Differences in Early Occupational Choices: Evidence from Medical Specialty Selection," Economics Working Papers EUI ECO 2022/01, European University Institute.
    10. Henrik Kleven & Camille Landais & Jakob Egholt Søgaard, 2021. "Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 183-198, June.
    11. Nico Migenda & Ralf Möller & Wolfram Schenck, 2021. "Adaptive dimensionality reduction for neural network-based online principal component analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Deng, Yue & Zhou, Yuqian & Hu, Dezhuang, 2023. "Grandparental childcare and female labor market behaviors: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Albanesi, Stefania & Olivetti, Claudia & Petrongolo, Barbara, 2022. "Families, labor markets and policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118038, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Barigozzi, Francesca & Cremer, Helmuth & Roeder, Kerstin, 2020. "Having it all, for all: Child-care subsidies and income distribution reconciled," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 188-211.
    15. Gabriella Conti & Rita Ginja & Petra Persson & Barton Willage, 2024. "The menopause "penalty"," IFS Working Papers W24/05, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Henrik Kleven & Camille Landais & Johanna Posch & Andreas Steinhauser & Josef Zweimüller, 2021. "Angebot an öffentlicher Kinderbetreuung und Einkommenseinbußen bei Mutterschaft," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 47(3), pages 309-328.
    17. Anos-Casero, Paloma & Udomsaph, Charles, 2009. "What drives firm productivity growth ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4841, The World Bank.
    18. Mathias Jensen & Abigail Adams & Barbara Petrongolo, 2024. "Birth Timing and Spacing: Implications for Parental Leave Dynamics and Child Penalties," Economics Series Working Papers 1048, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    19. Gerhard Derflinger, 1984. "A loss function for alpha factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 325-330, September.
    20. Taiki Yoshida & Yohei Otaka & Shin Kitamura & Kazuki Ushizawa & Masashi Kumagai & Yuto Kurihara & Jun Yaeda & Rieko Osu, 2022. "Development and validation of new evaluation scale for measuring stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation in rehabilitation wards," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.