IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usg/sfwpfi/201904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

As California goes, so goes the nation? Board gender quotas and the legislation of non-economic values

Author

Listed:
  • Felix von Meyerinck
  • Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi
  • Markus Schmid
  • Steven Davidoff Solomon

Abstract

In 2018, California became the first U.S. state to introduce a mandatory board gender quota for all firms headquartered in the state. We document negative announcement returns to the adoption of the quota for Californian firms, but also large negative spillover effects on a matched group of non-Californian firms, particularly those located in states that followed California’s legislative lead in the past by raising minimum wages or legalizing cannabis. Frictions on the director labor market only explain a small fraction of value losses of Californian firms. They do not explain the negative spillover effects on firms in other states. We propose shareholders’ fear of further legislation of non-economic values as a new explanation for the negative announcement returns to gender quotas. In line with this view, we find that firms with higher policy sensitivity show the strongest reaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix von Meyerinck & Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi & Markus Schmid & Steven Davidoff Solomon, 2019. "As California goes, so goes the nation? Board gender quotas and the legislation of non-economic values," Working Papers on Finance 1904, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Dec 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:usg:sfwpfi:2019:04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ux-tauri.unisg.ch/RePEc/usg/sfwpfi/WPF-1904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Engelberg & Pengjie Gao & Christopher A. Parsons, 2013. "The Price of a CEO's Rolodex," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(1), pages 79-114.
    2. Kenneth R. Ahern & Amy K. Dittmar, 2012. "The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(1), pages 137-197.
    3. Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2013. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1045-1061, May.
    4. Lucian Bebchuk & Alma Cohen & Allen Ferrell, 2009. "What Matters in Corporate Governance?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(2), pages 783-827, February.
    5. Custódio, Cláudia & Ferreira, Miguel A. & Matos, Pedro, 2013. "Generalists versus specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 471-492.
    6. David A. Matsa & Amalia R. Miller, 2013. "A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 136-169, July.
    7. Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger & Low, Angie & Stulz, René M., 2010. "Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 12-32, July.
    8. Anzhela Knyazeva & Diana Knyazeva & Ronald W. Masulis, 2013. "The Supply of Corporate Directors and Board Independence," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(6), pages 1561-1605.
    9. Amihud, Yakov & Stoyanov, Stoyan, 2017. "Do staggered boards harm shareholders?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 432-439.
    10. Drobetz, Wolfgang & von Meyerinck, Felix & Oesch, David & Schmid, Markus, 2018. "Industry expert directors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 195-215.
    11. Eliezer M. Fich, 2005. "Are Some Outside Directors Better than Others? Evidence from Director Appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(5), pages 1943-1972, September.
    12. Rüdiger Fahlenbrach & Hyemin Kim & Angie Low, 2018. "The Importance of Network Recommendations in the Director Labor Market," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 18-28, Swiss Finance Institute, revised Apr 2018.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongqiang Chu & Xinming Li & Daxuan Zhao, 2023. "Gender Diversity: From Wall Street to Main Street," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 151-168, November.
    2. Dasgupta, Sudipto & Boyallian, Patricia & Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2020. "Gender Diversity Goals, Supply Constraints, and the Market for Seasoned Female Directors: The U.S. Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15257, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Marina Gertsberg & Johanna Mollerstrom & Michaela Pagel, 2021. "Gender Quotas and Support for Women in Board Elections," NBER Working Papers 28463, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Xiangshang & Gao, Ning & Garrett, Ian & Xu, Yan, 2020. "Are CEOs judged on their companies' social reputation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Upadhyay, Arun, 2023. "Rising board gender diversity and incentives of female directors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Brian Bolton & Jing Zhao, 2022. "Busy Boards, Entrenched Directors and Corporate Innovation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Drobetz, Wolfgang & von Meyerinck, Felix & Oesch, David & Schmid, Markus, 2014. "Board Industry Experience, Firm Value, and Investment Behavior," Working Papers on Finance 1401, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Dec 2015.
    5. Nemmara K. Chidambaran & Yun Liu & Nagpurnanand Prabhala, 2022. "Director diversity and inclusion: At the table but in the game?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 193-225, March.
    6. Ying Li Compton & Sok-Hyon Kang & Zinan Zhu, 2019. "Gender Stereotyping by Location, Female Director Appointments and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 445-462, December.
    7. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Fleming, Lee & Manso, Gustavo, 2017. "Independent boards and innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 536-557.
    8. Baghdadi, Ghasan A. & Safiullah, Md & Heyden, Mariano L.M., 2023. "Do gender diverse boards enhance managerial ability?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. He, Zhaozhao & Miletkov, Mihail K. & Staneva, Viktoriya, 2023. "New kids on the block: The effect of Generation X directors on corporate performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 66-87.
    10. Eunice S. Khoo & Youngdeok Lim & Louise Y. Lu & Gary S. Monroe, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility performance and the reputational incentives of independent directors," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 841-881, May.
    11. Evgeniou, Theodoros & Vermaelen, Theo, 2017. "Share buybacks and gender diversity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 669-686.
    12. Adams, Renée B. & Akyol, Ali C. & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2018. "Director skill sets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 641-662.
    13. Liao, Rose C. & Loureiro, Gilberto & Taboada, Alvaro G., 2022. "Gender quotas and bank risk," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Mobbs, Shawn & Tan, Yongxian & Zhang, Shage, 2021. "Female directors: Why are some less informed than others?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Giannetti, Mariassunta & Wang, Tracy Yue, 2020. "Public Attention to Gender Equality and the Demand for Female Directors," CEPR Discussion Papers 14503, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Felix Meyerinck & David Oesch & Markus Schmid, 2016. "Is Director Industry Experience Valuable?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 45(1), pages 207-237, March.
    17. Etienne Redor, 2016. "Board attributes and shareholder wealth in mergers and acquisitions: a survey of the literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 789-821, December.
    18. Isabelle Solal & Kaisa Snellman, 2019. "Women Don’t Mean Business? Gender Penalty in Board Composition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1270-1288, November.
    19. Orihara, Masanori & Eshraghi, Arman, 2022. "Corporate governance compliance and herding," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Faleye, Olubunmi & Kung, Wilson & Parwada, Jerry T. & Tian, Gloria Y., 2020. "Are entrepreneurs special? Evidence from board appointments," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Board Gender Quota; Firm Value; Director Labor Market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usg:sfwpfi:2019:04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfisgch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.