IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contribution biplots

Author

Abstract

In order to interpret the biplot it is necessary to know which points – usually variables – are the ones that are important contributors to the solution, and this information is available separately as part of the biplot’s numerical results. We propose a new scaling of the display, called the contribution biplot, which incorporates this diagnostic directly into the graphical display, showing visually the important contributors and thus facilitating the biplot interpretation and often simplifying the graphical representation considerably. The contribution biplot can be applied to a wide variety of analyses such as correspondence analysis, principal component analysis, log-ratio analysis and the graphical results of a discriminant analysis/MANOVA, in fact to any method based on the singular-value decomposition. In the contribution biplot one set of points, usually the rows of the data matrix, optimally represent the spatial positions of the cases or sample units, according to some distance measure that usually incorporates some form of standardization unless all data are comparable in scale. The other set of points, usually the columns, is represented by vectors that are related to their contributions to the low-dimensional solution. A fringe benefit is that usually only one common scale for row and column points is needed on the principal axes, thus avoiding the problem of enlarging or contracting the scale of one set of points to make the biplot legible. Furthermore, this version of the biplot also solves the problem in correspondence analysis of low-frequency categories that are located on the periphery of the map, giving the false impression that they are important, when they are in fact contributing minimally to the solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Greenacre, 2009. "Contribution biplots," Economics Working Papers 1162, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jan 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1162.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Aitchison & Michael Greenacre, 2002. "Biplots of compositional data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(4), pages 375-392, October.
    2. Carl Eckart & Gale Young, 1936. "The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(3), pages 211-218, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Greenacre, 2012. "Fuzzy coding in constrained ordinations," Economics Working Papers 1325, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Michael J. Greenacre & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2016. "Weighted Euclidean Biplots," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(3), pages 442-459, October.
    3. Michael Greenacre, 2011. "The Contributions of Rare Objects in Correspondence Analysis," Working Papers 571, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Greenacre & Patrick J. F Groenen & Trevor Hastie & Alfonso Iodice d’Enza & Angelos Markos & Elena Tuzhilina, 2023. "Principal component analysis," Economics Working Papers 1856, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Sewell, Daniel K., 2018. "Visualizing data through curvilinear representations of matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 255-270.
    3. B. Baris Alkan & Afsin Sahin, 2011. "Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers by bi-plot approach: The case of Turkey," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 57-66.
    4. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2020. "Simpler Proofs for Approximate Factor Models of Large Dimensions," Papers 2008.00254, arXiv.org.
    5. Adele Ravagnani & Fabrizio Lillo & Paola Deriu & Piero Mazzarisi & Francesca Medda & Antonio Russo, 2024. "Dimensionality reduction techniques to support insider trading detection," Papers 2403.00707, arXiv.org.
    6. Alfredo García-Hiernaux & José Casals & Miguel Jerez, 2012. "Estimating the system order by subspace methods," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 411-425, September.
    7. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    8. Javier Palarea-Albaladejo & Josep Martín-Fernández & Jesús Soto, 2012. "Dealing with Distances and Transformations for Fuzzy C-Means Clustering of Compositional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 29(2), pages 144-169, July.
    9. Jos Berge & Henk Kiers, 1993. "An alternating least squares method for the weighted approximation of a symmetric matrix," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 115-118, March.
    10. Shimeng Huang & Henry Wolkowicz, 2018. "Low-rank matrix completion using nuclear norm minimization and facial reduction," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 5-26, September.
    11. Antti J. Tanskanen & Jani Lukkarinen & Kari Vatanen, 2016. "Random selection of factors preserves the correlation structure in a linear factor model to a high degree," Papers 1604.05896, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    12. Michael Greenacre & Paul Lewi, 2005. "Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of contingency tables, ratio-scale measurements and compositional data," Economics Working Papers 908, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Aug 2007.
    13. Jin-Xing Liu & Yong Xu & Chun-Hou Zheng & Yi Wang & Jing-Yu Yang, 2012. "Characteristic Gene Selection via Weighting Principal Components by Singular Values," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    14. Anna Maria Fiori & Francesco Porro, 2023. "A compositional analysis of systemic risk in European financial institutions," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-354, September.
    15. Kargin, V. & Onatski, A., 2008. "Curve forecasting by functional autoregression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(10), pages 2508-2526, November.
    16. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    17. W. Gibson, 1962. "On the least-squares orthogonalization of an oblique transformation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(2), pages 193-195, June.
    18. Germ`a Coenders & N'uria Arimany Serrat, 2023. "Accounting statement analysis at industry level. A gentle introduction to the compositional approach," Papers 2305.16842, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    19. Walter Kristof, 1967. "Orthogonal inter-battery factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(2), pages 199-227, June.
    20. Willem E. Saris & Marius de Pijper & Jan Mulder, 1978. "Optimal Procedures for Estimation of Factor Scores," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 85-106, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biplot; contributions; correspondence analysis; discriminant analysis; log-ratio analysis; MANOVA; principal component analysis; scaling; singular value decomposition; weighting.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C19 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Other
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.