IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Budget Support: A Reformed Approach Or Old Wine In New Skins?

  • Martin Knoll
Registered author(s):

    Multi-donor budget support is an increasingly important modality for aid delivery, comprising up to30 per cent of central government spending in sub-Saharan African countries. While many donor institutions regard budget support as an improved method of developmental assistance, citing positive impacts on pro-poor spending and the quality of services delivered to the poor, the concepts of strengthened ownership and sovereignty at the heart of this new approach have not been fully implemented to date. This paper explores deficiencies evident in three areas: (i) the volatility of budget support funding remains high, undercutting national-budget sustainability; (ii) the non-BWI donor community is overly reliant on conditionality formulated by the World Bank and IMF, conditionality that is ideologically coloured and often inconsistent with PRSPs; and (iii) the process towards harmonization and alignment is slow and sluggish, complicated by donor concerns over visibility and influence as well as deficiencies in recipient financial management systems, a lack of transparency, and weak links between national budgets and poverty-reduction strategies. It is hoped that additional research in this area will facilitate the development of budget support schemes with greater harmonization and alignment, enhanced recipient ownership, and larger effects on poverty reduction.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/osgdp20085_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in its series UNCTAD Discussion Papers with number 190.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:unc:dispap:190
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Palais des Nations, CH - 1211 Geneva 10
    Phone: +41 22 907 12 34
    Fax: +41 22 907 00 43
    Web page: http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2101&lang=1
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Stefan G. Koeberle, 2003. "Should Policy-Based Lending Still Involve Conditionality?," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 18(2), pages 249-273.
    2. Benedict J. Clements & Gabriela Inchauste & Nita Thacker & Thomas William Dorsey & Shamsuddin Tareq & Emanuele Baldacci & Sanjeev Gupta & Mark W. Plant, 2002. "Is the PRGF Living Up to Expectations?," IMF Occasional Papers 216, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Dani Rodrik, 2006. "Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank's Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 973-987, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unc:dispap:190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joerg Mayer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.