IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uma/periwp/wp100.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Certification Systems as Tools for Natural Asset Building: Potential, Experiences to Date, and Critical Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Michael E. Conroy

Abstract

Certification systems are becoming important tools to encourage and reward social and environmental responsibility. This paper explores whether these systems, which generally have not been designed for the explicit aim of poverty reduction, can assist poor people, either individually or in community-based and small-to-medium production units, to build their natural assets as a basis for sustainable livelihoods. The paper examines two leading certification systems – the Forest Stewardship Council™ and the Fair Trade Certified™ system – and emerging systems in tourism and mining. The results to date have been mixed. In the forestry sector, poverty reduction benefits of certification have been modest relative to its environmental benefits. In the agricultural commodity trade, where certification systems have been designed with a stronger focus on reducing poverty, the benefits have been greater. The long-term challenge is to ensure that the rapid global uptake and ‘mainstreaming’ of certification systems does not create new hurdles for low-income individuals and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael E. Conroy, 2005. "Certification Systems as Tools for Natural Asset Building: Potential, Experiences to Date, and Critical Challenges," Working Papers wp100, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  • Handle: RePEc:uma:periwp:wp100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://per.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_51-100/WP100.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael E. Conroy, 2001. "Can Advocacy-Led Certification Systems Transform Global Corporate Practices? Evidence, and Some Theory," Working Papers wp21, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    2. James K. Boyce & Manuel Pastor, 2001. "Building Natural Assets: New Strategies for Poverty Reduction and Environmental Protection," Research Reports rr3, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Wilkinson, 2007. "Fair Trade: Dynamic and Dilemmas of a Market Oriented Global Social Movement," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 219-239, September.
    2. Laura A. Henry & Soili Nysten-Haarala & Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Oil Industry in the Russian Arctic: Global Norms and Neo-Paternalism," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(8), pages 1340-1368, September.
    3. Lisa Jordan & Keith Griffin & Jane D'Arista, 2001. "Democratizing Global Economic Governance: A PERI Symposium," Working Papers wp26, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    4. Tulaeva, Svetlana, 2013. "Institutional trust: The process of trust formation in Russian forest villages in accordance with the international system of forest certification," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 20-27.
    5. Vincent Terstappen & Lori Hanson & Darrell McLaughlin, 2013. "Gender, health, labor, and inequities: a review of the fair and alternative trade literature," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 21-39, March.
    6. Bacon, Chris, 2004. "Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt0xn3f86t, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    7. Gingrich, Chris D. & King, Emily J., 2012. "Does Fair Trade Fulfill the Claims of its Proponents? Measuring the Global Impact of Fair Trade on Participating Coffee Farmers," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 26, pages 1-23.
    8. Bacon, Christopher, 2005. "Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 497-511, March.
    9. Laura T. Raynolds & Douglas Murray & Peter Leigh Taylor, 2004. "Fair trade coffee: building producer capacity via global networks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(8), pages 1109-1121.
    10. Anthony Hall, 2004. "Extractive Reserves: Building Natural Assets in the Brazilian Amazon," Working Papers wp74, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    11. Yuki Shibamura & Noriko Sudo & Gengaku Mashiro & Shigeru Beppu & Risa Hakamata & Kanata Saito, 2020. "Personnel Training Course for Businesses Regarding the Response to Stranded Persons Focusing on Vulnerable People from the Perspective of Business Continuity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Martha West Lyman & Curt Grimm & Julie Renaud Evans, 2014. "Community forests as a wealth creation strategy for rural communities," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 474-489, December.
    13. Sarah Lyon, 2007. "Fair Trade Coffee and Human Rights in Guatemala," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 241-261, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    certification; social responsibility; environmental responsibility; povery reduction; natural assets; sustainable livelihoods; Forest Stewardship Council™; Fair Trade Certified™; tourism; mining; forestry; agriculture; globalization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
    • J80 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - General
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • L72 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Other Nonrenewable Resources
    • L73 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Forest Products

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uma:periwp:wp100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Judy Fogg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/permaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.