IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-393996.html

The Governance and Funding of European Rearmament

Author

Listed:
  • Guntram Wolff
  • Armin Steinbach
  • Jeromin Zettelmeyer

Abstract

Gaps in European military equipment are substantial compared to Russia s military build-up. The European defence market is fragmented and weakened by home bias in procurement, low order numbers and technological gaps. With the US now retreating from its role as Europe s guardian, greater European cooperation will be essential to close technological gaps and reduce rearmament costs. Procurement will need to be pooled to reduce market fragmentation and avoid that additional demand for defence goods will mainly drive up prices. Better-integrated defence markets would both increase competition and facilitate entry of new defence technology firms. The combination of integrated markets and scaled-up procurement could halve unit costs. This article discusses how this could be achieved either by scaling instruments in the current institutional framework or by creating a new intergovernmental institution, the European Defence Mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Guntram Wolff & Armin Steinbach & Jeromin Zettelmeyer, 2025. "The Governance and Funding of European Rearmament," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/393996, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/393996
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/393996/3/GovernanceFundingRearmament.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Steinbach & Guntram B. Wolff, 2024. "Financing European air defence through European Union debt," Bruegel Policy Brief node_10289, Bruegel.
    2. Wolff, Guntram B. & Burilkov, Alexandr & Bushnell, Katelyn & Kharitonov Ivan, 2024. "Fit for war in decades: Europe's and Germany's slow rearmament vis-à-vis Russia," Kiel Reports 1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    3. Mark Harrison, 1990. "A volume index of the total munitions output of the United Kingdom, 1939-1944," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 43(4), pages 657-666, November.
    4. Burilkov, Alexandr & Wolff, Guntram B., 2025. "Defending Europe without the US: First estimates of what is needed," Kiel Policy Briefs 183, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    5. Lucio Pench, 2025. "Dilemmas for the EU in deficit-financing of defence expenditure and maintenance of fiscal discipline," Bruegel Working Papers node_10780, Bruegel.
    6. Carril, Rodrigo & Duggan, Mark, 2020. "The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense contracting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Lafond, François & Greenwald, Diana & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2022. "Can Stimulating Demand Drive Costs Down? World War II as a Natural Experiment," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(3), pages 727-764, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Quinet, Alain & Jaravel, Xavier & Schularick, Moritz & Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, 2025. "Economic principles for European rearmament," Kiel Policy Briefs 195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    3. Burilkov, Alex & Bushnell, Katelyn & Mejino-López, Juan & Morgan, Thomas & Wolff, Guntram B., 2025. "Fit for war by 2030? European rearmament efforts vis-à-vis Russia," Kiel Reports 3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    4. Roel Beetsma & Marco Buti & Francesco Nicoli, 2025. "EU Defense Union: Short-Term Feasibility and Long-Term Coherence," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(03), pages 22-28, July.
    5. Alexandr Burilkov & Katelyn Bushnell & Juan Majino-Lopez & Thomas Morgan & Guntram Wolff, 2025. "Bruegel-Kiel Report - Fit for War by 2030? European Rearmament Efforts vis-à-vis Russia," Working Papers ECARES 2025-10, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Quinet, Alain & Jaravel, Xavier & Schularick, Moritz & Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, 2025. "Ökonomische Leitlinien für die europäische Aufrüstung [Economic principles for European rearmament]," Kiel Policy Briefs 195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burilkov, Alexandr & Wolff, Guntram B., 2025. "Europa ohne die USA verteidigen: eine erste Analyse, was gebraucht wird [Defending Europe without the US: First estimates of what is needed]," Kiel Policy Briefs 183, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    2. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    3. Cappelletti, Matilde & Giuffrida, Leonardo M., 2022. "Targeted bidders in government tenders," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Irto, Giuseppe & Kharitonov, Ivan & Nishikawa, Taro & Trebesch, Christoph, 2025. "Ukraine aid: How Europe can replace US support," Kiel Policy Briefs 186, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    5. Alexandre Chirat & Basile Clerc, 2025. "A “Climate War Economy”? Medium-run Macroeconomic Disequilibrium of the Green Transition," Working Papers 2025-10, CRESE.
    6. Andreas Baur & Lisandra Flach & Sebastian Link & Andreas Peichl, 2024. "Who’s Afraid of Trump in the White House? How German Firms View the US Election," EconPol Policy Brief 65, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    7. Ethan Ilzetzki, 2024. "Learning by Necessity: Government Demand, Capacity Constraints, and Productivity Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2436-2471, August.
    8. Jonas Minet Kinge & Jostein Grytten, 2021. "The impact of primary care physician density on perinatal health: Evidence from a natural experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 2974-2994, December.
    9. Lafond, François, 2025. "Forecasting technological progress," INET Oxford Working Papers 2025-10, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Dec 2025.
    10. Heinrich, Torsten & Yang, Jangho, 2022. "Innovation in times of Covid-19," MPRA Paper 115809, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2022. "Supplier selection and contract enforcement: Evidence from performance bonding," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 980-1019, November.
    12. Joshua D. Gottlieb & Maria Polyakova & Kevin Rinz & Hugh Shiplett & Victoria Udalova, 2020. "Who Values Human Capitalists' Human Capital? Healthcare Spending and Physician Earnings," Working Papers 20-23, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    13. Francesco Decarolis & Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Elisabetta Iossa & Vincenzo Mollisi & Emilio Raiteri & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2021. "Buyers' role in innovation procurement: Evidence from US military R&D contracts," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 697-720, November.
    14. Ward, S.H. & Lopes Cardozo, N.J., 2025. "Value-led fusion technology: A framework for guiding fusion commercialisation strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Raiteri, Emilio, 2021. "Buyers' workload and R&D procurement outcomes: Evidence from the US Air Force Research Lab," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-059, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Allende, Claudia & Atal, Juan Pablo & Carril, Rodrigo & Cuesta, José Ignacio & González-Lira, Andrés, 2024. "Drivers of public procurement prices: Evidence from pharmaceutical markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Dustin T. Hill & Mary B. Collins, 2023. "Toxic waste and public procurement: The defense sector as a disproportionate contributor to pollution from public–private partnerships," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 389-410, April.
    18. Burilkov, Alexandr & Wolff, Guntram B., 2025. "Defending Europe without the US: First estimates of what is needed," Kiel Policy Briefs 183, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    19. Mejino-Lopez Juan & Wolff Guntram B., 2025. "Boosting the European Defence Industry in a Hostile World," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 60(1), pages 34-39.
    20. Bardt Hubertus, 2024. "Industrial Policy and a Single Market for Defence Goods," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(6), pages 332-337.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/393996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.