IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucn/oapubs/10197-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The implications of a switch to locally varying business rates

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ridge
  • Kevin Denny

Abstract

It has been nearly 2 years since the UK government reformed the system of local business rates to introduce a uniform business rate (UBR), but the debate continues over the merits of the new system. The change across regions in the revenues raised by the uniform system of business rates introduced in 1990 was due to 2 distinct components: a UBR effect and a reassessment of rateable values effect. Four alternative models of locally varying business rates were analyzed. These models are distinguished by alternative assumptions about resource equalization. A return to a system similar to the pre-1990 varying rates system would unfairly burden businesses in areas of low population. An improved model would take into account the degree of business concentration within a local authority. Using a model that relates local business tax rates to expenditure per establishment rather than per capita appears to be a more appropriate way of achieving horizontal equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ridge & Kevin Denny, 1992. "The implications of a switch to locally varying business rates," Open Access publications 10197/153, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/153
    File Function: Open Access version, 1992
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Bond & Kevin Denny & John Hall & William McClusky, 1996. "Who pays business rates?," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 19-35, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nicolas Clifton). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.