Discoveries of fakes: their impact on the art market
Despite the dramatic surge in the production of fakes, their impact on the art market remains unexplored. This paper investigates the overall impact that the discovery of a fake painting, for example a fake Gauguin, has on the market for paintings from the same artist (Gauguin’s artworks). Before the fake’s discovery, artworks are less likely to be sold through Sotheby’s or Christie’s suggesting that sellers may wish to avoid their extensive scrutiny. However, when fakes have been discovered sellers rely more often on these auction houses, probably because they are viewed as providing a credible form of certification. Surprisingly, fake discoveries have almost no impact on the probability to sell an artwork. Prices only react negatively with a lag, suggesting that sellers try to postpone their sales as long as possible. Eventually, close to a year after fakes have been made public, prices increase indicating that buyers view the market as purged.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published by:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +32 (0)2 650.48.64
Fax: +32 (0)2 650.41.88
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Renneboog, L.D.R. & Spaenjers, C., 2009.
"Buying Beauty : On Prices and Returns in the Art Market,"
2009-15, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Luc Renneboog & Christophe Spaenjers, 2013. "Buying Beauty: On Prices and Returns in the Art Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 36-53, February.
- Victor Ginsburgh & Jianping Mei & Michael Moses, 2006. "On the computation of art indices in art," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/7290, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- repec:dgr:kubcen:200915 is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:dgr:kubtil:2009004 is not listed on IDEAS
- Ginsburgh, Victor & Mei, Jianping & Moses, Michael, 2006. "The Computation of Prices Indices," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier.
- Heckman, James, 2013.
"Sample selection bias as a specification error,"
Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
- Collins, Alan & Scorcu, Antonello & Zanola, Roberto, 2009. "Reconsidering hedonic art price indexes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 57-60, August.
- Victor Ginsburgh & David Throsby, 2006.
"Handbook of the economics of art and culture,"
ULB Institutional Repository
2013/1673, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Ott Toomet & Arne Henningsen, . "Sample Selection Models in R: Package sampleSelection," Journal of Statistical Software, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(i07).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/89693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.