IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp26-10.html

Specification testing with many auxiliary statistics

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We develop a new test for the correct specification of a model which compares a large number of auxiliary statistics computed with observed data to their model-generated counterparts. We establish the asymptotic properties of our new specification test under general regularity assumptions. To further validate our method, we perform extensive Monte-Carlo simulations to empirically assess its finite sample properties across a range of models and parameter configurations. Our analysis reveals that the size of our test remains controlled consistently, with a strong ability to detect deviations from the true model. Further, our experiments convincingly show that allowing for a larger set of auxiliary statistics significantly enhances our test's ability to detect deviations from the true model. Finally, we illustrate the performance of our proposed test by evaluating the suitability of Champernowne (1953)'s parametric model to characterize wealth and income data from the U.S. In particular, we consider a broad set of auxiliary statistics, including percentiles, quantile ratios, and inequality measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertille Antoine and Richmond Tetteh, 2026. "Specification testing with many auxiliary statistics," Discussion Papers dp26-10, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfu.ca/repec-econ/sfu/sfudps/dp26-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.