IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp26-10.html

Specification testing with many auxiliary statistics

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We develop a new test for the correct specification of a model which compares a large number of auxiliary statistics computed with observed data to their model-generated counterparts. We establish the asymptotic properties of our new specification test under general regularity assumptions. To further validate our method, we perform extensive Monte-Carlo simulations to empirically assess its finite sample properties across a range of models and parameter configurations. Our analysis reveals that the size of our test remains controlled consistently, with a strong ability to detect deviations from the true model. Further, our experiments convincingly show that allowing for a larger set of auxiliary statistics significantly enhances our test's ability to detect deviations from the true model. Finally, we illustrate the performance of our proposed test by evaluating the suitability of Champernowne (1953)'s parametric model to characterize wealth and income data from the U.S. In particular, we consider a broad set of auxiliary statistics, including percentiles, quantile ratios, and inequality measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertille Antoine & Richmond Tetteh, 2026. "Specification testing with many auxiliary statistics," Discussion Papers dp26-10, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfu.ca/repec-econ/sfu/sfudps/dp26-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrasco, Marine & Florens, Jean-Pierre, 2000. "Generalization Of Gmm To A Continuum Of Moment Conditions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 797-834, December.
    2. Carrasco, Marine & Chernov, Mikhail & Florens, Jean-Pierre & Ghysels, Eric, 2007. "Efficient estimation of general dynamic models with a continuum of moment conditions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 529-573, October.
    3. Amengual, Dante & Carrasco, Marine & Sentana, Enrique, 2020. "Testing distributional assumptions using a continuum of moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 655-689.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine, Bertille & Sun, Wenqian, 2025. "Simulation-based estimation with many auxiliary statistics applied to long-run dynamic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Guay, Alain & Pelgrin, Florian, 2023. "Structural VAR models in the Frequency Domain," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(1).
    3. Amengual, Dante & Fiorentini, Gabriele & Sentana, Enrique, 2025. "Testing Shock Independence in Gaussian Structural VARs," CEPR Discussion Papers 20975, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Amengual, Dante & Fiorentini, Gabriele & Sentana, Enrique, 2024. "Specification tests for non-Gaussian structural vector autoregressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(2).
    5. Han, Hyojin, 2020. "On the identification of models with conditional characteristic functions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Carrasco, Marine & Tchuente, Guy, 2015. "Regularized LIML for many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 427-442.
    7. Gospodinov, Nikolay & Otsu, Taisuke, 2012. "Local GMM estimation of time series models with conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 476-490.
    8. Alastair R. Hall, 2015. "Econometricians Have Their Moments: GMM at 32," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(S1), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Carrasco, Marine & Kotchoni, Rachidi, 2017. "Efficient Estimation Using The Characteristic Function," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 479-526, April.
    10. Stéphane Goutte & David Guerreiro & Bilel Sanhaji & Sophie Saglio & Julien Chevallier, 2019. "International Financial Markets," Post-Print halshs-02183053, HAL.
    11. Boswijk, H. Peter & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Vladimirov, Evgenii, 2024. "Estimating option pricing models using a characteristic function-based linear state space representation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
    12. Han, Hyojin & Khrapov, Stanislav & Renault, Eric, 2020. "The leverage effect puzzle revisited: Identification in discrete time," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 230-258.
    13. Carrasco, Marine, 2012. "A regularization approach to the many instruments problem," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 383-398.
    14. Li, Junye & Favero, Carlo & Ortu, Fulvio, 2012. "A spectral estimation of tempered stable stochastic volatility models and option pricing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3645-3658.
    15. Gagliardini, Patrick & Gouriéroux, Christian, 2019. "Identification by Laplace transforms in nonlinear time series and panel models with unobserved stochastic dynamic effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 613-637.
    16. Dante Amengual & Marine Carrasco & Enrique Sentana, 2017. "Testing Distributional Assumptions Using a Continuum of Moments," Working Papers wp2018_1709, CEMFI.
    17. Caner, Mehmet & Yıldız, Neşe, 2012. "CUE with many weak instruments and nearly singular design," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 422-441.
    18. Jean-Jacques Forneron, 2019. "A Sieve-SMM Estimator for Dynamic Models," Papers 1902.01456, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    19. Escobar, Marcos & Ferrando, Sebastian & Rubtsov, Alexey, 2018. "Dynamic derivative strategies with stochastic interest rates and model uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 49-71.
    20. Kotchoni, Rachidi, 2014. "The indirect continuous-GMM estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 464-488.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.