IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sdp/sdpwps/52.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efectos del SCOMP sobre la Elección individual de Modalidad de Pensión

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Esteban Halcartegaray
  • Jorge Miranda

    () (Studies Division, Chilean Pension Supervisor)

Abstract

Este trabajo hace un análisis de las características que definen la elección individual de modalidad de pensión para los jubilados en el sistema previsional chileno. Se utilizan datos de la Encuesta de Protección Social 2009 y datos administrativos de la Superintendencia de Pensiones para generar una muestra representativa de jubilados con sus características individuales. En particular, se evalúa el efecto de la implementación del Sistema de Consulta y Oferta de Montos de Pensión (SCOMP) sobre la elección individual y se incorporan nuevos determinantes de la elección de modalidad de pensión que antes no habían sido utilizados para el caso chileno. Se encuentra que la implementación del SCOMP ha disminuido la probabilidad de contratar una Renta Vitalicia debido a la introducción de información que antes no estaba disponible al menos para un grupo de afiliados. Por otro lado, respecto a los demás determinantes de la elección de modalidad de pensión, se concluye que ser hombre, y haber tenido contacto con un intermediario aumentan la probabilidad de tomar una Renta Vitalicia como modalidad de pensión. Asimismo, la elegibilidad a pensión mínima garantizada, la intención de herencia y la edad de jubilación la disminuyen. Existe una relación positiva y decreciente entre el saldo de la Cuenta de Capitalización Individual y la probabilidad de tomar una RV. Finalmente, se encuentra que la diferencia porcentual entre la primera pensión por ambas modalidades se torna un determinante importante en la elección de modalidad posterior a la implementación de SCOMP, que es cuando la información sobre el monto de las pensiones se comenzó a entregar a todos los afiliados que escogen modalidad de pensión. .

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Esteban Halcartegaray & Jorge Miranda, 2011. "Efectos del SCOMP sobre la Elección individual de Modalidad de Pensión," Working Papers 52, Superintendencia de Pensiones, revised Aug 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:sdp:sdpwps:52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.spensiones.cl/redirect/files/doctrab/DT00052.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernheim, B Douglas, 1991. "How Strong Are Bequest Motives? Evidence Based on Estimates of the Demand for Life Insurance and Annuities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(5), pages 899-927, October.
    2. Jeffrey R. Brown & Jeffrey R. Kling & Sendhil Mullainathan & Marian V. Wrobel, 2008. "Why Don’t People Insure Late-Life Consumption? A Framing Explanation of the Under-Annuitization Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 304-309, May.
    3. Thomas Davidoff & Jeffrey R. Brown & Peter A. Diamond, 2005. "Annuities and Individual Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1573-1590, December.
    4. Carlos Antonio Díaz & Gonzalo Edwards, "undated". "Anualidades Vitalicias Variables: Una Nueva Modalidad de Pensión," Documentos de Trabajo 166, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    5. John Ameriks & Andrew Caplin & Steven Laufer & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2007. "The Joy of Giving or Assisted Living? Using Strategic Surveys to Separate Bequest and Precautionary Motives," NBER Working Papers 13105, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Cassio M. Turra & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2004. "The Impact of Health Status and Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenditures on Annuity Valuation," Working Papers wp086, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    7. Abel, Andrew B, 1986. "Capital Accumulation and Uncertain Lifetimes with Adverse Selection," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1079-1097, September.
    8. Jeffrey R. Brown & James M. Poterba, 1999. "Joint Life Annuities and Annuity Demand by Married Couples," NBER Working Papers 7199, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Laitner, John & Juster, F Thomas, 1996. "New Evidence on Altruism: A Study of TIAA-CREF Retirees," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 893-908, September.
    10. Amy Finkelstein & James Poterba, 2004. "Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets: Policyholder Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(1), pages 183-208, February.
    11. Alejandra Cox-Edwards & Estelle James, 2006. "Crowd-out, Adverse Selection and Information in Annuity Markets: Evidence from a New Retrospective Data Set in Chile," Working Papers wp147, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    12. Wilhelm, Mark O, 1996. "Bequest Behavior and the Effect of Heirs' Earnings: Testing the Altruistic Model of Bequests," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 874-892, September.
    13. Hurd, Michael D, 1989. "Mortality Risk and Bequests," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 779-813, July.
    14. Salvador Valdés & Gonzalo Edwards, "undated". "Jubilación en los Sistemas Pensionales Privados," Documentos de Trabajo 182, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    15. Ivica Dus & Raimond Maurer & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2005. "Betting on Death and Capital Markets in Retirement: A Shortfall Risk Analysis of Life Annuities," NBER Working Papers 11271, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Modalidad de Pensión; SCOMP; Renta Vitalicia; Retiro Programado.;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdp:sdpwps:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andres Otero). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/spegvcl.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.