IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Collective Action and Property Rights: Some Critical Issues in the Context of Karnataka

Listed author(s):
  • K G Gayathri Devi

    (Institute for social and Economic Change)

Registered author(s):

    In the context of natural resource management (NRM), collective action includes conforming to the rules of both the use and avoiding the use of a common property (CP). It is argued that property rights do not mean or imply full ownership, or sole authority, to use and dispose of a resource; and that different individuals, families, groups and even the state tend to have overlapping use and decision-making rights regarding natural resources (NR). To facilitate this, the rights have to be secure and for a sufficiently long enough duration to allow one to reap the rewards of any investment. They should also be backed by an effective, socially-sanctioned enforcement institution. In the past two decades, degradation of natural resources has affected the functions of such institutions and also their sustainability. This has added to the already existing challenges in regulating the use of NR (in its various forms). It is argued that the existing inequalities are deepened due to the by forces like globalization, trade liberalization and privatization. Developing countries like India, which were already ‘crippled’ in their social and economic advancement due to internal problems of social exclusion of communities on the grounds of caste and ethnicity, illiteracy, ill health and economic poverty, are now confronted with new challenges of equitable distribution of NR among their diverse populations in rural, tribal and urban areas. There is a need to devise policies and programmes against a situation where socio-cultural hierarchies and economic stratification have traditionally denied ownership and access to NR for a number of communities and individuals on the grounds of their caste, class, gender and other considerations.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore in its series Working Papers with number 199.

    in new window

    Length: 41 pages
    Date of creation: 2008
    Handle: RePEc:sch:wpaper:199
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Nagarabhavi, Bangalore - 560072

    Phone: +91-80-23215468
    Fax: +91-80-23217008
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Pradhan, Rajendra & Di Gregorio, Monica, 2004. "Understanding property rights," 2020 vision briefs 11 No. 3, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Pranab Bardhan, 2002. "Decentralization of Governance and Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 185-205, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sch:wpaper:199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (B B Chand)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.