IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Were Major League Baseball Doubleheaders a Mistake?

  • Layson, Stephen

    ()

    (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics)

  • Rhodes, M. Taylor

    ()

    (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics)

Registered author(s):

    This paper uses daily Major League Baseball (MLB) data from 1938 to 2009 as well annual MLB data from 1920 to 2009 to estimate the effects of doubleheaders on attendance. The annual data over various sub-samples from 1920-2009 indicate that the number of doubleheaders have either a negative or an insignificant effect on annual attendance. The daily data from 1938-2009 show that doubleheaders have a very positive effect on attendance on the day of the doubleheaders but that this is substantially offset by reduced attendance at single games 3 days surrounding doubleheaders. This leads us to question the widespread use of doubleheaders.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://bae.uncg.edu/assets/research/econwp/2011/layson_rhodes.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 11-5.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 33 pages
    Date of creation: 04 Feb 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ris:uncgec:2011_005
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Box 26165, Greensboro, NC 27402-6165
    Phone: (336) 334-5463
    Fax: (336) 334-4089
    Web page: http://www.uncg.edu/bae/econ/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:uncgec:2011_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Al Link)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.