IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-16-40.html

Does water scarcity shift the electricity generation mix toward fossil fuels? Empirical evidence from the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Eyer, Jonathan

  • Wichman, Casey

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Water withdrawals for the energy sector are the largest use of fresh water in the United States. Using an econometric model of monthly plant-level electricity generation levels between 2001 and 2012, we estimate the effect of water scarcity on the US electricity fuel mix. We find that hydroelectric generation decreases substantially in response to drought, although this baseline generation is offset primarily by natural gas, depending on the geographic region. We provide empirical evidence that drought can increase emissions of CO2 as well as local pollutants. We quantify the average social costs of water scarcity to be $51 million per state-year (2015 dollars) attributable to CO2 emissions alone; however, this figure is much larger for regions that rely heavily on hydropower.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyer, Jonathan & Wichman, Casey, 2016. "Does water scarcity shift the electricity generation mix toward fossil fuels? Empirical evidence from the United States," RFF Working Paper Series dp-16-40, Resources for the Future.
    • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-16-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-16-40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Senni, Chiara Colesanti & von Jagow, Adrian, 2023. "Water risks for hydroelectricity generation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119256, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Mathilda Eriksson & Alejandro del Valle & Alejandro de la Fuente, 2025. "Droughts worsen air quality and health by shifting power generation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Yang, Jie & Huang, Yijing & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2022. "Does drought increase carbon emissions? Evidence from Southwestern China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Ordoñez, Pablo J., 2020. "Power Plants, Air Pollution, and Health in Colombia," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304284, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Zohrabian, Angineh & Sanders, Kelly T., 2018. "Assessing the impact of drought on the emissions- and water-intensity of California's transitioning power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 461-470.
    6. Araujo, Rafael, 2024. "The value of tropical forests to hydropower," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Doan, Bao & Vo, Duc Hong & Pham, Huy, 2023. "The net economic benefits of power plants: International evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Xiaojun Yu & Russell Smyth & Yao Yao & Quanda Zhang, 2024. "Water stress and industrial firm productivity: Evidence from China," Monash Economics Working Papers 2024-20, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    9. Jin, Yi & Behrens, Paul & Tukker, Arnold & Scherer, Laura, 2019. "Water use of electricity technologies: A global meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Colesanti Senni, Chiara & Goel, Skand & von Jagow, Adrian, 2024. "Economic and financial consequences of water risks: The case of hydropower," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    11. Eriksson,Mathilda & del Valle,Alejandro & De La Fuente,Alejandro, 2024. "Droughts Worsen Air Quality by Shifting Power Generation in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10760, The World Bank.
    12. Dario Aversa & Nino Adamashvili & Mariantonietta Fiore & Alessia Spada, 2022. "Scoping Review (SR) via Text Data Mining on Water Scarcity and Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Muhammad Saeed Meo & Solomon Prince Nathaniel & Muhammad Murtaza Khan & Qasim Ali Nisar & Tehreem Fatima, 2023. "Does Temperature Contribute to Environment Degradation? Pakistani Experience Based on Nonlinear Bounds Testing Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(3), pages 535-549, June.
    14. Liang, Jing & Wu, Di, 2025. "Heatwaves worsen the air pollution from energy systems: Empirical evidence from balancing authorities in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Casey J. Wichman, 2017. "Book Review: “Thirst for Power: Energy, Water, and Human Survival”," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-4, January.
    16. Jenny R. Frank & Tristan R. Brown & Rohit D. Bhonagiri & Ryan J. Quinn & Kirsten C. McGiver & Marie-Odile P. Fortier & Robert W. Malmsheimer & Timothy A. Volk & Thomas R. Dapp, 2023. "Assessing Indian Point’s Electricity Generation Through Renewable Energy Pathways: A Technical and Economic Analysis," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 989-1005, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-16-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.