IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating Quarterly Different Price and Wage Rigidity and Its Implication for Monetary Policy


  • Sung Ho Park

    (Bank of Korea)


In New Keynesian economics, price and wage rigidity is a key factor in determining effects of monetary policy. As rigidity becomes stronger, the monetary policy becomes more effective. If this rigidity has seasonality, the effects of monetary policy may also have seasonality. Olivei and Tenreyo (2007) found that the effects of monetary policy in the US are quarterly different via quarter-dependent VAR and showed that these different effects of monetary policy is caused by the seasonality of wage rigidity by setting up the DSGE model with quarterly different wage rigidity which has different effects of monetary policy according to when monetary policy shocks occur. I extend the model of Olivei and Tenreyo (2007) by adding quarterly different price rigidity and compare which rigidity is more influential in determining the quarterly different effects of monetary policy. I also estimate the quarterly price and wage rigidity via Minimum Distance Approach. The results of this paper can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the impulse responses to monetary policy in the DSGE model change very much across quarters when we assume quarterly different wage rigidity. Impulse responses are strong(weak) if the monetary policy shocks occur in the quarter when the wage rigidity is strong(weak). However, these differences of impulse responses across quarters become weaker when we assume quarterly different price rigidity. This result is consistent to that of Christiano et al. (2005) who show that impulse responses do not change very much as values of price rigidity. Based on these impulse response results, we may that quarterly different impulse responses according to timing of monetary shocks depend mainly on quarterly varying wage rigidity. Secondly, the price puzzle occurs if monetary policy is implemented in the period when wage rigidity is strong. This result supports Rabanal (2007) and Henzel et al. (2009) who mphasize the role of wage rigidity in price puzzle. This results is Lastly, estimation results show that wage rigidity is quarterly different while price rigidity is not. Estimates of wage rigidity are high in the 2nd quarter and low in the 3rd quarter.However, estimates of price rigidity do not have particular patterns across quarters.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Ho Park, 2013. "Estimating Quarterly Different Price and Wage Rigidity and Its Implication for Monetary Policy," 2013 Meeting Papers 1367, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed013:1367

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Eichenbaum, Martin, 1992. "'Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy' : by Christopher Sims," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1001-1011, June.
    2. Jeffrey C. Fuhrer & C. Hoyt Bleakley, "undated". "Computationally Efficient Solution and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models," Computing in Economics and Finance 1997 35, Society for Computational Economics.
    3. Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles L. Evans, 2005. "Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(1), pages 1-45, February.
    4. Anderson, Gary & Moore, George, 1985. "A linear algebraic procedure for solving linear perfect foresight models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 247-252.
    5. Henzel, Steffen & Hülsewig, Oliver & Mayer, Eric & Wollmershäuser, Timo, 2009. "The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 268-289, June.
    6. Julio Rotemberg & Michael Woodford, 1997. "An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy," NBER Chapters,in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Volume 12, pages 297-361 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Rabanal, Pau, 2007. "Does inflation increase after a monetary policy tightening? Answers based on an estimated DSGE model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 906-937, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed013:1367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.