Estimating Quarterly Different Price and Wage Rigidity and Its Implication for Monetary Policy
In New Keynesian economics, price and wage rigidity is a key factor in determining effects of monetary policy. As rigidity becomes stronger, the monetary policy becomes more effective. If this rigidity has seasonality, the effects of monetary policy may also have seasonality. Olivei and Tenreyo (2007) found that the effects of monetary policy in the US are quarterly different via quarter-dependent VAR and showed that these different effects of monetary policy is caused by the seasonality of wage rigidity by setting up the DSGE model with quarterly different wage rigidity which has different effects of monetary policy according to when monetary policy shocks occur. I extend the model of Olivei and Tenreyo (2007) by adding quarterly different price rigidity and compare which rigidity is more influential in determining the quarterly different effects of monetary policy. I also estimate the quarterly price and wage rigidity via Minimum Distance Approach. The results of this paper can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the impulse responses to monetary policy in the DSGE model change very much across quarters when we assume quarterly different wage rigidity. Impulse responses are strong(weak) if the monetary policy shocks occur in the quarter when the wage rigidity is strong(weak). However, these differences of impulse responses across quarters become weaker when we assume quarterly different price rigidity. This result is consistent to that of Christiano et al. (2005) who show that impulse responses do not change very much as values of price rigidity. Based on these impulse response results, we may that quarterly different impulse responses according to timing of monetary shocks depend mainly on quarterly varying wage rigidity. Secondly, the price puzzle occurs if monetary policy is implemented in the period when wage rigidity is strong. This result supports Rabanal (2007) and Henzel et al. (2009) who mphasize the role of wage rigidity in price puzzle. This results is Lastly, estimation results show that wage rigidity is quarterly different while price rigidity is not. Estimates of wage rigidity are high in the 2nd quarter and low in the 3rd quarter.However, estimates of price rigidity do not have particular patterns across quarters.
|Date of creation:||2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA|
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Julio Rotemberg & Michael Woodford, 1997. "An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Volume 12, pages 297-361 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Steffen Henzel & Oliver Hülsewig & Eric Mayer & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2007.
"The Price Puzzle Revisited: Can the Cost Channel Explain a Rise in Inflation after a Monetary Policy Shock?,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
2039, CESifo Group Munich.
- Henzel, Steffen & Hülsewig, Oliver & Mayer, Eric & Wollmershäuser, Timo, 2009. "The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 268-289, June.
- Henzel, Steffen & Hülsewig, Oliver & Mayer, Eric, 2009. "The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock?," Munich Reprints in Economics 19421, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles L. Evans, 2005.
"Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(1), pages 1-45, February.
- Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles L. Evans, 2001. "Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Jun.
- Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles L. Evans, 2001. "Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy," Working Paper Series WP-01-08, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
- Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles Evans, 2001. "Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy," NBER Working Papers 8403, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin Eichenbaum & Charles L. Evans, 2001. "Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy," Working Paper 0107, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
- Eichenbaum, Martin, 1992. "'Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy' : by Christopher Sims," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1001-1011, June.
- Jeffrey C. Fuhrer & C. Hoyt Bleakley, .
"Computationally Efficient Solution and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models,"
Computing in Economics and Finance 1997
35, Society for Computational Economics.
- Jeffrey C. Fuhrer & Hoyt Bleakley, 1996. "Computationally efficient solution and maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear rational expectation models," Working Papers 96-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed013:1367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.