Bear Raids and Short Sale Bans: Is Government Intervention Justifiable?
incur signiﬁcant trading losses in the process. We ﬁnd that for a large enough existing stake, the value of ensuring the right decision oﬀsets these trading losses. However, when his existing stake is inadequate, short sellers succeed in destroying value. Whether this justiﬁes intervention depends on the expected value loss from ineﬃcient decisions versus the costs of intervention.
|Date of creation:||2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA|
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed010:165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.