IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qub/wpaper/1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological Change And The EU ETS: The Case Of Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Anderson
  • Frank Convery
  • Corrado Di Maria

Abstract

The European Union commenced the pilot phase of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) in 2005 with the intent to enhance the adoption of existing low-carbon technologies and the development and of new ones by putting a price on CO 2 emissions. We survey Irish EU ETS firms to study the occurrence and determinants of CO 2 emissions friendly technological change during the pilot phase (2005-2007). Despite declining emissions prices and policy related uncertainty, 48% of responding Irish firms employed new machinery or equipment, 74% made process or behavioral changes, and 41% switched fuels to some degree that contributed to emissions reductions during the pilot phase. The effect of rising energy prices on these emissions and energy saving actions should not be overlooked. In general, we find that the EU ETS was effective in stimulating moderate technological change and also raising awareness about emissions reduction possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Anderson & Frank Convery & Corrado Di Maria, 2010. "Technological Change And The EU ETS: The Case Of Ireland," Economics Working Papers 10-06, Queen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast.
    • Handle: RePEc:qub:wpaper:1006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://ftp.qub.ac.uk/pub/users/repec/qub/wpaper/MS_WPS_ECO_10_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaofeng Lyu & Shuxin Deng & Zewei Dai, 2023. "Emissions Trading Systems, Structure Adjustment and Air Pollution Reduction: Evidence from Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Liu, Ming & Shan, Yanfei & Li, Yemei, 2022. "Study on the effect of carbon trading regulation on green innovation and heterogeneity analysis from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Yiguo Chen & Peng Luo & Tsangyao Chang, 2024. "Testing the Effectiveness of Government Investments in Environmental Governance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Siying Yang & Wenxuan Sun & Zhouyi Wu & Yang He, 2022. "Can the SO2 emission trading system promote urban emission reduction?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 963-974, June.
    5. Li, Shan & Liu, Jianjiang & Shi, Daqian, 2021. "The impact of emissions trading system on corporate energy efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Zhengge Tu & Tao Zhou & Ning Zhang, 2019. "Does China’s Pollution Levy Standards Reform Promote Green Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Teixidó, Jordi & Verde, Stefano F. & Nicolli, Francesco, 2019. "The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Tim Laing & Misato Sato & Michael Grubb & Claudia Comberti, 2013. "Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System," GRI Working Papers 106, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    9. Jia, Xiao & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2024. "Induced innovation in power generation technologies: Evidence from the Tokyo–Saitama Emissions Trading System," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Huo, Da & Zhang, Xiaotao & Hu, Chao & Tang, Aidi & Chen, Yongchuan & Chen, Fang & Chen, Zhanming & Xu, Weiyin, 2023. "Spatial externality of journalism on carbon efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment based on interplay of journalism-based professionally generated content and digital economy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1326-1336.
    11. Hu, Jiangfeng & Pan, Xinxin & Huang, Qinghua, 2020. "Quantity or quality? The impacts of environmental regulation on firms’ innovation–Quasi-natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading pilot," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Jurate Jaraite-Ka~ukauske and Corrado Di Maria, 2016. "Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    13. Jian Song & Yijing Wang & Jing Wang, 2022. "The Impact of SO 2 Emissions Trading Scheme on Firm’s Environmental Performance: A Channel from Robot Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Sun, Kege & Zhou, Fengqi & Liu, Xinyu, 2024. "Study on the impact of emission trading scheme on technological progress of power generation sector in China: A perspective from energy transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    15. Torben K. Mideksa, 2021. "Leadership and Climate Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 9054, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Union Emissions Trading System; Climate Policy; Innovation; Technological Change;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qub:wpaper:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark McGovern (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dequbuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.