IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/138.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Integrated Analysis of a Power Purchase Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn Jenkins

    () (Queen's University, Kingston, On, Canada)

  • Henry Lim

Abstract

A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is at the heart of any BOT or BOO type power generation project that is to be undertaken by an Independent Power Producer (IPP). During the past decade privately owned IPPs selling electricity to the power industry has become common place. Such arrangements require some version of a PPA. In this paper we model a multi-currency loan and equity financing package for a 100 MW combined-cycle gas turbine generation plant that is to be built in India. Using this financial model we evaluate a sophisticated power purchase agreement in order to identify the relative importance of each of the variables found in such an agreement. Variables become important if they represent major elements of costs or revenues or are significant sources of risk. This paper provides an example of the benefits that an integrated financial-economic-stakeholder analysis can bring to the evaluation of a PPA and BOT contracts. The integrated approach allows various scenarios to be compared from different perspectives and points of view. The economic analysis looks at the project’s impact on a country’s overall economy. The financial analysis of such an infrastructure project checks on the profitability and sustainability of the project over time. Sensitivity and risk analyses are central to the evaluation of this project since they identify the most critical variables and allow a probability distribution of values to be used in the model, rather than a single predicted value. The distributive or stakeholder analysis identifies who would be the major winners and losers if the power plant project were undertaken. This approach enables the partners to the agreement to “test” the sustainability of the contract through the analysis of the project’s outcomes under a wide range of situations and combinations of scenarios before the PPA is entered into. The technique of testing contracts for their future sustainability is area of research of potentially great benefit to the parties entering into long term contractual arrangements for public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn Jenkins & Henry Lim, 1999. "An Integrated Analysis of a Power Purchase Agreement," Development Discussion Papers 1999-08, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_138.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_138.xls
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Jenkins & HENRY LIM & GANGADHAR SHUKLA, 1999. "Evaluation Of An Expansion Of The Electricity Transmission System In Mexico," Development Discussion Papers 1999-05, JDI Executive Programs.
    2. Glenn Jenkins & D.N.S. DHAKAL, 1991. "International Trade In Energy: The Chukha Hydro-Electric Project In Bhutan," Development Discussion Papers 1990-01, JDI Executive Programs.
    3. Glenn P. Jenkins, 1994. "The appraisal of investment projects: A teaching approach," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(1), pages 115-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glenn Jenkins & MARIA MARCHESINI, 1999. "An Analysis Of Electricity Generation And Tariff Options In Ghana," Development Discussion Papers 1999-03, JDI Executive Programs.
    2. Glenn Jenkins & Andrey Klevchuk, "undated". "Appraisal Of El-Kureimat Combined Cycle Power Plant," Development Discussion Papers 2006-03, JDI Executive Programs.
    3. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 7 (Principles Underlying The Economic Analysis of Projects)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-07, JDI Executive Programs.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India; electricity; agreement; foreign investment; privatization; appraisal;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bahman Kashi). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.