Une analyse systémique de l'évaluation des ressources humaines - réflexions et expérimentations en milieu scolaire
[A Systemic Analysis of the Evaluation of the Human Resources - Reflections and Experiments From a School's Sample]
Evaluation's way is set on a paradox. The feed-back of evaluation would imply - according to a wrong way - the evaluation of the examiner. Systemic Analysis could show the promises and the semantic limits of this technical. It seems to be impossible to measure work's human value through the measurement of evaluation. Because examiner is human too, measurement should be wrong twice. So, validity and efficiency of evaluation seems to appear only if the game between pupils and examiner is a positive sum game.
|Date of creation:||1998|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Theodore W. Schultz, 1960. "Capital Formation by Education," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 68, pages 571.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:9702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.