Ranking authors and institutions by publications in regional science journals: 2010-2014
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Dan S. Rickman & John V. Winters, 2016. "Ranking Authors and Institutions by Publications in Regional Science Journals: 2010–2014," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 312-336, June.
- Dan S. Rickman & John V. Winters, 2015. "Ranking Authors and Institutions by Publications in Regional Science Journals: 2010-2014," Economics Working Paper Series 1603, Oklahoma State University, Department of Economics and Legal Studies in Business.
References listed on IDEAS
- Jordi Surinach Caralt & Juan Carlos Duque & Raul Ramos Lobo & Vicente Royuela Mora, 2002. "Authors', Institutions' and Countries' rankings in regional and urban science. An analysis for nine top international journals from 1991 to 2000," Working Papers in Economics 92, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
- Gunther Maier, 2007. "What do we think are the most important journals for regional science?," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2007(1), pages 5-34.
- Andrew M. Isserman, 1993. "Lost In Space? On The History, Status, And Future Of Regional Science (Presidential Address, April 4, 1992)," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-50, Summer.
- Partridge, Mark D., 2006. "We're Right, They're Wrong, Regional Science Is Where It's At," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-14.
- Yolanda Kodrzycki & Pingkang David Yu, 2005. "New approaches to ranking economics journals," Working Papers 05-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
- Therese C. Grijalva & Clifford Nowell, 2008. "A Guide to Graduate Study in Economics: Ranking Economics Departments by Fields of Expertise," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 74(4), pages 971-996, April.
- Sergio J. Rey & Luc Anselin, 2000. "Regional Science Publication Patterns in the 1990s," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(4), pages 323-344, October.
- Durden, Garey C. & Knox, Hugh W., 2000. "The Southern Regional Science Association and The Review of Regional Studies: History and Characteristics," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 30(1), pages 93-114, Summer.
More about this item
KeywordsRegional Science; Author rankings; Journal rankings;
- A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
- B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2015-07-18 (All new papers)
- NEP-SOG-2015-07-18 (Sociology of Economics)
- NEP-URE-2015-07-18 (Urban & Real Estate Economics)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:65593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.