Economic Stability and the Central Bank: Rule or Discretion
The history of monetary policy in Iran, judging by their performance in keeping the value of the currency, maintaining a steady growth in the Gross Domestic Product, faltering investment, show that monetary policy has not been a portrait of consistent successes, to say the least. It has been employed in an on-again-off-again manner rather than as a tool for proactive decision making. In this paper the author shows the simulation results for the GDP growth under a regime of fixed monetary rule under different assumptions Comparing the historical changes in the monetary base with a policy rule would highlight the benefits of a response rule. One could see wider fluctuations in the monetary base compare to what was warranted according to the response function. They also show that in most of the cases, monetary base moved the opposite of what should have been done according to the response function. That is, in most years, they reduced the money supply when they should have increased it and increased the money supply when they should have decreased it. At times, it seems that they made a wrong monetary policy and the next year, found their mistake and over compensated for the mistake by overshooting or undershooting.
|Date of creation:||2006|
|Date of revision:||2006|
|Publication status:||Published in Iranian Economic review 16.11(2006): pp. 165-175|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hamburger, Michael J., 1983. "Recent velocity behavior, the demand for money and monetary policy," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Dec, pages 108-128.
- Michael J. Dueker & Andreas M. Fischer, 1998. "A guide to nominal feedback rules and their use for monetary policy," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jul, pages 55-63.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:26860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.