R&D inputs and productivity growth in China
The relationship between investment in R&D and productivity growth have been well documented in the literature. So far little research has been done on this topic for China, in part due to data limitations. Using the perpetual inventory method (PIM), this paper first estimates the R&D stock in China between 1978 and 2002. If R&D stock is measured, we can then estimate the elasticity of output with respect to R&D, thus estimate the contribution of R&D investment to output in China. The paper finds China’s economic growth mainly depends on capital input and that the impact of R&D capital on China’s growth is insignificant between 1978 and 2002. Then the essay examines the impact of R&D input on Total Factor Productivity (TFP), and finds that R&D input explains 30% of TFP change in China between 1980 and 2000 and that one percent increase in R&D input leads to 0.27 percent increase in TFP in China. The essay also finds that TFP in China has experienced an unusual fall since 1995.
|Date of creation:||22 Mar 2004|
|Date of revision:||25 May 2004|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany|
Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Zvi Griliches, 1998.
"R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing Firms,"
NBER Chapters,in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 187-210
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Zvi Griliches & Jacques Mairesse, 1991. "R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing Firms," NBER Chapters,in: Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, pages 317-348 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Zvi Griliches & Jacques Mairesse, 1985. "R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing Firms," NBER Working Papers 1778, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.