IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128985.html

Deconstructing China’s Economic “Paradoxes” from the Essence of Resource Allocation:A First-Principles Analysis Based on Political-Economic Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shuangning

Abstract

Mainstream Western economics has long separated politics from economics, constructing an idealized phenomenological model based on “homogeneous individuals, no classes, and no power intervention.” Using this model as a benchmark to judge China’s economic practice has produced the so-called “Ten Major Paradoxes of the Chinese Economy.” However, these paradoxes do not indicate that China’s economy violates economic laws; rather, they are the inevitable result of Western theories detaching themselves from the homologous essence of politics and economics and ignoring the underlying logic of resource allocation in human society. Starting from first principles, this paper traces the original logic of human nature, class, power, and politics, compares the core differences in social structure and governance models between China and the West, and reveals the underlying logic of China’s economic operation. It ultimately demonstrates that all the so-called “Chinese economic paradoxes” can be completely explained within the framework of “political-economic integrated resource allocation.” The confusion in Western economics stems essentially from the limitations of its own theoretical framework, not from any anomaly in the Chinese economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shuangning, 2025. "Deconstructing China’s Economic “Paradoxes” from the Essence of Resource Allocation:A First-Principles Analysis Based on Political-Economic Integration," MPRA Paper 128985, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128985/1/MPRA_paper_128985.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2007. "Introductiion to One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth," Introductory Chapters, in: One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press.
    2. Yingyi Qian, 2002. "How Reform Worked in China," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 473, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    3. Justin Yifu Lin, 2012. "The Quest for Prosperity: How Developing Economies Can Take Off," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 9812, December.
    4. Qian, Yingyi, 2002. "How Reform Worked in China," CEPR Discussion Papers 3447, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    5. Naughton, Barry J., 2018. "The Chinese Economy: Adaptation and Growth, second edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262534797, December.
    6. World Bank, 2023. "World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2023 : Migrants, réfugiés et société]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 39696, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramanujam Nandini & Caivano Nicholas, 2016. "The BRIC Nations and the Anatomy of Economic Development: The Core Tenets of Rule of Law," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 269-320, December.
    2. Chari, Murali D.R. & Banalieva, Elitsa R., 2015. "How do pro-market reforms impact firm profitability? The case of India under reform," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 357-367.
    3. Jiang, Helu & Zheng, Yu & Zhu, Lijun, 2022. "Entry Barriers and Growth: The Role of Endogenous Market Structure," CEPR Discussion Papers 15763, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Jentzsch, Nicola, 2008. "An economic analysis of China's credit information monopoly," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 537-550, December.
    5. repec:ces:ifodic:v:2:y:2004:i:2:p:14567799 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Gérard Roland, 2004. "Institutions and Economic Performance - Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(02), pages 16-21, October.
    7. Cortes Quiñonez, Juan Camilo & Cabezas, Stefania Cielo, 2025. "Análisis macroeconómico e institucional del riesgo de crédito en el sector agrícola de los países en desarrollo [Credit risk in the agricultural sector: an agricultural economics analysis using panel data]," MPRA Paper 128675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Wei, Chu & Löschel, Andreas & Liu, Bing, 2015. "Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-43.
    9. Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2011. "The Conditions for Long-Term Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: China as a Model, a Contraint and an Opportunity," Post-Print halshs-03604139, HAL.
    10. Gérard Roland, 2004. "Institutions and Economic Performance - Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(2), pages 16-21, October.
    11. Shuxing Shi & Kunming Huang & Dezhu Ye & Linhui Yu, 2014. "Culture and regional economic development: Evidence from China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 281-299, June.
    12. Bruno Meessen & Gerald Bloom, 2007. "Economic Transition, Institutional Changes and the Health System: Some Lessons from Rural China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 209-231.
    13. Helu Jiang & Yu Zheng & Lijun Zhu, 2023. "Entry Barriers and Growth: The Role of Endogenous Market Structure," Working Papers 956, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    14. Yiu Por (Vincent) Chen, 2016. "Fiscal Decentralization, Rural Industrialization and Undocumented Labour Mobility in Rural China, 1982–87," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(9), pages 1469-1482, September.
    15. Ketels Christian, 2017. "Working Paper 258 - Structural Transformation: A competitiveness-based view," Working Paper Series 2369, African Development Bank.
    16. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Hardy, Daniel, 2017. "Firm competitiveness and regional disparities in Georgia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67543, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Bruno Meessen & Gerald Bloom, 2007. "Economic Transition, Institutional Changes and the Health System: Some Lessons from Rural China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 209-231.
    18. Giovanni Dosi & Jiasu Lei & Xiaodan Yu, 2013. "Institutional Change and Productivity Growth in China's Manufacturing 1998-2007: the Microeconomics of Creative Restructuring," LEM Papers Series 2013/07, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Zenglein, Max J., 2008. "Marketization of the Chinese labor market and the role of unions," GLU Working Papers 4, Global Labour University (GLU).
    20. Bingzheng Chen & Sharon Tennyson & Maoqi Wang & Haizhen Zhou, 2014. "The Development and Regulation of China's Insurance Market: History and Perspectives," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 241-263, September.
    21. Usman Qadir (ed.), 2024. "Wheels Of Change: Tracing Pakistans Automotive Evolution Through Political Economy And Technology Acquisition," PIDE Books, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, number 2024:08.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.