IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/101563.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Income distribution, technical change, and economic growth: A two-sector Kalecki--Kaldor approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nishi, Hiroshi

Abstract

This paper presents a two-sector Kalecki--Kaldor model of income distribution, technical change, and economic growth. The model is Kaleckian in the sense that it incorporates mark-up pricing, investment independent of saving, and excess capacity. It is also Kaldorian in that labour productivity growth is led by Kaldor's technical progress function. In other words, productivity growth is endogenously realised through the technology embodied in new capital stock, which differentiates our model from previous two-sector models. Our extension drastically changes the standard Kaleckian implications. We find that although the economic activity levels in the short run are led by the demand and income distribution parameters, economic growth in the long run is realised by supply-side (i.e. technical change and the associated productivity and wage growth) parameters. The important implication of our findings is that a two-sector economy faces a trade-off between a high economic growth rate and the local stability of the steady state.

Suggested Citation

  • Nishi, Hiroshi, 2020. "Income distribution, technical change, and economic growth: A two-sector Kalecki--Kaldor approach," MPRA Paper 101563, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:101563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/101563/1/MPRA_paper_101499.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shinya Fujita, 2019. "Mark-up pricing, sectoral dynamics, and the traverse process in a two-sector Kaleckian economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 465-479.
    2. Mark Setterfield, 2016. "Wage- versus profit-led growth after 25 years: an introduction," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 367-372, October.
    3. Lucrezia Fanti & Luca Zamparelli, 2021. "The paradox of thrift in a two‐sector Kaleckian growth model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 526-538, July.
    4. Nicholas Kaldor, 1955. "Alternative Theories of Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 83-100.
    5. Lavoie, Marc, 1995. "The Kaleckian Model of Growth and Distribution and Its Neo-Ricardian and Neo-Marxian Critiques," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(6), pages 789-818, December.
    6. Mark Setterfield (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12814.
    7. Hiroki Murakami, 2018. "A two†sector Keynesian model of business cycles," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 444-472, May.
    8. Bassi, Federico & Lang, Dany, 2016. "Investment hysteresis and potential output: A post-Keynesian–Kaleckian agent-based approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 35-49.
    9. Lavoie, Marc & Ramirez-Gaston, Pablo, 1997. "Traverse in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model of Growth with Target-Return Pricing," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 65(2), pages 145-169, March.
    10. Murakami, Hiroki & Zimka, Rudolf, 2020. "On dynamics in a two-sector Keynesian model of business cycles," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Bassi, Federico & Lang, Dany, 2016. "Investment hysteresis and potential output: A post-Keynesian–Kaleckian agent-based approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 35-49.
    12. Daniele Tavani & Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Endogenous Technical Change In Alternative Theories Of Growth And Distribution," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1272-1303, December.
    13. Beqiraj, Elton & Fanti, Lucrezia & Zamparelli, Luca, 2019. "Sectoral composition of output and the wage share: The role of the service sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Timmer,Marcel P. & Inklaar,Robert & O'Mahony,Mary & Ark,Bart van, 2013. "Economic Growth in Europe," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107412446.
    15. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 2017. "Heterodox Theories Of Economic Growth And Income Distribution: A Partial Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1240-1271, December.
    16. Alain Serres & Stefano Scarpetta & Christine Maisonneuve, 2001. "Falling Wage Shares in Europe and the United States: How Important is Aggregation Bias?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 375-401, December.
    17. Elton Beqiraj & Lucrezia Fanti & Luca Zamparelli, 2019. "Sectoral Composition of Output and the Wage Share: a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model," Working Papers 3/19, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    18. Shinya Fujita, 2015. "Mark-up Pricing, Sectoral Dynamics, and the Traverse Process in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Economy," Discussion papers e-15-005, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    19. Gérard Duménil & Dominique Lévy, 1999. "Being Keynesian in the Short Term and Classical in the Long Term: The Traverse to Classical Long‐Term Equilibrium," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 67(6), pages 684-716, December.
    20. Marc Lavoie & Stockhammer Engelbert, 2013. "Wage-Led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery," Post-Print hal-01343664, HAL.
    21. Fabrizio Antenucci & Matteo Deleidi & Walter Paternesi Meloni, 2020. "Kaldor 3.0: An Empirical Investigation of the Verdoorn-augmented Technical Progress Function," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 49-76, July.
    22. Adalmir Marquetti, 2004. "Do Rising Real Wages Increase The Rate Of Labor‐Saving Technical Change? Some Econometric Evidence," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 432-441, November.
    23. Hiroshi Nishi, 2019. "Sources of Productivity Growth Dynamics: Is Japan Suffering From Baumol's Growth Disease?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(3), pages 592-616, September.
    24. Engelbert Stockhammer, 2017. "Wage-led versus profit-led demand: what have we learned? A Kaleckian–Minskyan view," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 25-42, January.
    25. Adalmir Marquetti & Luiz Eduardo Ourique & Henrique Morrone, 2020. "A Classical-Marxian Growth Model of Catching Up and the Cases of China, Japan, and India: 1980–2014," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 312-334, June.
    26. Marglin, Stephen A, 1984. "Growth, Distribution, and Inflation: A Centennial Synthesis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 115-144, June.
    27. Sushanta K. MALLICK & Ricardo M. SOUSA, 2017. "The skill premium effect of technological change: New evidence from United States manufacturing," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 156(1), pages 113-131, March.
    28. Bhaduri, Amit & Marglin, Stephen, 1990. "Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 375-393, December.
    29. Jung Hoon Kim & Marc Lavoie, 2017. "Demand-led Growth and Long-run Convergence in a Neo-Kaleckian Two-sector Model," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 33, pages 179-206.
    30. Steven M Fazzari & Piero Ferri & Anna Maria Variato, 2020. "Demand-led growth and accommodating supply," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 583-605.
    31. Hiroshi Nishi & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2020. "Cyclical dynamics in a Kaleckian model with demand and distribution regimes and endogenous natural output," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 256-288, February.
    32. Nishi, Hiroshi & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2020. "Distribution shocks in a Kaleckian model with hysteresis and monetary policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 465-479.
    33. Shinya Fujita, 2019. "Who should bear the pain of price competition? A Kaleckian approach," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 321-340, July.
    34. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2020. "A two-sector Kaleckian model of growth and distribution with endogenous productivity dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-243.
    35. Travis Campbell & Daniele Tavani, 2019. "Marx‐biased technical change and income distribution: A panel data analysis," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 655-687, November.
    36. Storm, Servaas & Naastepad, C. W. M., 2012. "Macroeconomics Beyond the NAIRU," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674062276, Spring.
    37. Servaas Storm & C.W.M. Naastepad, 2017. "Bhaduri–Marglin meet Kaldor–Marx: wages, productivity and investment," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 4-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucrezia Fanti & Luca Zamparelli, 2021. "The paradox of thrift in a two‐sector Kaleckian growth model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 526-538, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2020. "A two-sector Kaleckian model of growth and distribution with endogenous productivity dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-243.
    2. Lucrezia Fanti & Luca Zamparelli, 2021. "The paradox of thrift in a two‐sector Kaleckian growth model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 526-538, July.
    3. Nishi, Hiroshi & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2020. "Distribution shocks in a Kaleckian model with hysteresis and monetary policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 465-479.
    4. Eckhard Hein, 2017. "Post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid 1990s: main developments," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 131-172, September.
    5. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2018. "A Dynamic Analysis of Demand and Productivity Growth in a Two-sector Kaleckian Model," MPRA Paper 86778, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Sasaki, Hiroaki, 2012. "Is the long-run equilibrium wage-led or profit-led? A Kaleckian approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 231-244.
    7. Hein, Eckhard, 2022. "Varieties of demand and growth regimes: Post-Keynesian foundations," IPE Working Papers 196/2022, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    8. Robert A. Blecker, 2016. "Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: the long and the short of it," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 373-390, October.
    9. Huang, Biao, 2022. "On the Over-determination Problem in a Two Sector Neo-Kaleckian Model," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP56, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    10. Hiroshi Nishi & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2020. "Cyclical dynamics in a Kaleckian model with demand and distribution regimes and endogenous natural output," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 256-288, February.
    11. Stirati, Antonella & Paternesi Meloni, Walter, 2021. "Unemployment and the wage share: a long-run exploration for major mature economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-352.
    12. Won Jun Nah & Lavoie, Marc, 2018. "Overhead labour costs in a neo-Kaleckian growth model with autonomous expenditures," IPE Working Papers 111/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    13. Eric Kemp‐Benedict, 2020. "Convergence of actual, warranted, and natural growth rates in a Kaleckian–Harrodian‐classical model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 851-881, November.
    14. Lavoie, M. & Stockhammer, Engelbert,, 2012. "Wage-led growth : concepts, theories and policies," ILO Working Papers 994709363402676, International Labour Organization.
    15. Soon Ryoo, 2016. "Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 429-457, May.
    16. Beqiraj, Elton & Fanti, Lucrezia & Zamparelli, Luca, 2018. "Structural Change and the Wage Share: a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model," MPRA Paper 89558, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Hiroshi Nishi, 2014. "Income Distribution and Economic Growth in a Multi-Sectoral Kaleckian Model," Discussion papers e-14-011, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    18. Váry, Miklós, 2021. "The long-run real effects of monetary shocks: Lessons from a hybrid post-Keynesian-DSGE-agent-based menu cost model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Hein, Eckhard, 2016. "The Bhaduri/Marglin post-Kaleckian model in the history of distribution and growth theories: An assessment by means of model closures," IPE Working Papers 66/2016, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    20. Thomas I. Palley, 2012. "A neo-Kaleckian - Goodwin model of capitalist economic growth: Monopoly power,managerial pay, labor market conflict, and endogenous technical progress," IMK Working Paper 105-2012, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Two-sector model; Economic growth; Endogenous productivity growth; Technical change; Income distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution
    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:101563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.