The Kaleckian Model of Growth and Distribution and its Neo-Ricardian and Neo-Marxian Critiques
This paper analyzes the newer Kaleckian models of growth and distribution and the criticisms that have been addressed to them by neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian authors. The models discussed assume overhead labor costs and target return pricing. The main issues are the form of the investment function and the notions of normal rates of profit and of normal rates of capacity utilization. Despite the relevance of, and often the similarity between, the neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian critiques, it is shown that the main features of the Kaleckian growth model may still be preserved. (c) 1995 Academic Press Limited Copyright 1995 by Oxford University Press.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1992|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (613) 562-5753
Fax: (613) 562-5999
Web page: http://www.socialsciences.uottawa.ca/eco/eng/index.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ott:wpaper:9201e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diane Ritchot)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.