IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osk/wpaper/2609.html

Information Frictions and the Transition to Clean Cooking Fuels in West Africa: Evidence from Instrumental Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Sanoh Yusuf

    (Graduate School of Economics, The University of Osaka)

Abstract

This paper examines the causal effect of informational access on household cooking fuel choices across seven West African countries using nationally representative Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) data covering 51,848 households in Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. Informational access is proxied by household television ownership, while endogeneity is addressed using a leave-one-out cluster-level television ownership instrument within IV-2SLS, IV-Probit, and nonlinear control-function frameworks. Results show that television exposure significantly increases the probability of LPG adoption by 16.3 percentage points and charcoal use by 17.7 percentage points, while reducing firewood dependence by 13.0 percentage points. IV estimates are substantially larger than corresponding OLS estimates, suggesting that conventional models underestimate the role of informational frictions in household energy transitions. Strong heterogeneity emerges across spatial and socioeconomic groups. Urban households exhibit much larger clean-fuel responses, while rural households remain constrained by weak infrastructure, limited LPG availability, and affordability barriers. Among low-income households, informational exposure increases charcoal use more strongly than LPG adoption, indicating movement toward intermediate fuels rather than full transition to clean energy. The findings suggest that informational access is an important but insufficient driver of clean cooking transitions in West Africa and highlight the need to combine behavioural communication strategies with infrastructure expansion and affordability-focused clean cooking policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanoh Yusuf, 2026. "Information Frictions and the Transition to Clean Cooking Fuels in West Africa: Evidence from Instrumental Variables," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 26-09, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:2609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/econ_society/dp/2609.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bensch, Gunther & Peters, Jörg, 2015. "The intensive margin of technology adoption – Experimental evidence on improved cooking stoves in rural Senegal," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 44-63.
    2. Masera, Omar R. & Saatkamp, Barbara D. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2000. "From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2083-2103, December.
    3. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeuland, Marc & Fetter, T. Robert & Li, Yating & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Usmani, Faraz & Bluffstone, Randall A. & Chávez, Carlos & Girardeau, Hannah & Hassen, Sied & Jagger, Pamela & Jaime, Mónica , 2021. "Is energy the golden thread? A systematic review of the impacts of modern and traditional energy use in low- and middle-income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Zi, Cao & Qian, Meng & Baozhong, Gao, 2021. "The consumption patterns and determining factors of rural household energy: A case study of Henan Province in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Gould, Carlos F. & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2018. "LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 395-408.
    4. Jeuland, M.A. & Bhojvaid, V. & Kar, A. & Lewis, J.J. & Patange, O. & Pattanayak, S.K. & Ramanathan, N. & Rehman, I.H. & Tan Soo, J.S. & Ramanathan, V., 2015. "Preferences for improved cook stoves: Evidence from rural villages in north India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 287-298.
    5. Alem, Yonas & Ruhinduka, Remidius D., 2020. "Saving Africa's tropical forests through energy transition: A randomized controlled trial in Tanzania," Ruhr Economic Papers 885, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    6. Bonan, Jacopo & Battiston, Pietro & Bleck, Jaimie & LeMay-Boucher, Philippe & Pareglio, Stefano & Sarr, Bassirou & Tavoni, Massimo, 2021. "Social interaction and technology adoption: Experimental evidence from improved cookstoves in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Chen, Jiahui & Liao, Hua & Zhang, Tong, 2024. "Empowering women substantially accelerates the household clean energy transition in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Averi Chakrabarti & Sudhanshu Handa & Malawi and Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Teams, 2023. "The impacts of cash transfers on household energy choices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1426-1457, October.
    9. Alem, Yonas, 2021. "Mitigating climate change through sustainable technology adoption: Insights from cookstove interventions," Ruhr Economic Papers 907, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    10. Calzada, Joan & Sanz, Alex, 2018. "Universal access to clean cookstoves: Evaluation of a public program in Peru," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 559-572.
    11. Lindgren, Samantha, 2024. "Sociocultural determinants of electric cooking in rural Namibia: Recommendations for youth and educational approaches to implementation strategy and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Anett Kuntosch & Bettina König, 2018. "Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 881-896, August.
    13. Shonali Pachauri & Narasimha D Rao & Colin Cameron, 2018. "Outlook for modern cooking energy access in Central America," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Jeuland, Marc & Tan Soo, Jie-Sheng & Shindell, Drew, 2018. "The need for policies to reduce the costs of cleaner cooking in low income settings: Implications from systematic analysis of costs and benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 275-285.
    15. Lindgren, Samantha, 2021. "Cookstove implementation and Education for Sustainable Development: A review of the field and proposed research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Brooks, N. & Bhojvaid, V. & Jeuland, M.A. & Lewis, J.J. & Patange, O. & Pattanayak, S.K., 2016. "How much do alternative cookstoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from North India," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 153-171.
    17. Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke & Chinyere Augusta Nwajiuba & Jane Munonye & Uwazie Iyke Uwazie & Nkechinyere Uwajumogu & Christian Obioma Uwadoka & Jonathan Ogbeni Aligbe, 2019. "Improved Cook-stoves and Environmental and Health Outcomes: Lessons from Cross River State, Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Korkeakoski Mika & Mentula Minna & Vähäkari Noora & Luukkanen Jyrki & Kaivo-oja Jari & Alexeeva Anna & Chea Eliyan & Va Dany & Kallio Maarit & Hogarth Nicholas, 2021. "Situation analysis of energy use and consumption in Cambodia: household access to energy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18631-18655, December.
    19. Dickinson, Katherine L. & Piedrahita, Ricardo & Coffey, Evan R. & Kanyomse, Ernest & Alirigia, Rex & Molnar, Timothy & Hagar, Yolanda & Hannigan, Michael P. & Oduro, Abraham Rexford & Wiedinmyer, Chri, 2019. "Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in Northern Ghana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 361-374.
    20. Irene Namugenyi & Ståle Navrud & Joachim Scholderer & Sarah Ephrida Tione, 2023. "Do Biomass Technology Innovations Improve Subjective Well-Being? Traditional versus Improved Cookstoves in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C26 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:2609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Economic Society of Osaka University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.