IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ds8px.html

Prevention of Armed Conflict in Europe: Comparing the Role of the EU and the US/NATO

Author

Listed:
  • Carl, Noah

Abstract

The period of relative peace in Europe since the end of the Second World War has been variously described as the ‘Pax Europaea’ and the ‘Pax Americana’. These descriptions reflect two major theories purporting to account for the relative absence of armed conflict during this period: one emphasising the pacifying impact of the EU, and the other emphasising the pacifying impact of the US/NATO. The present paper attempts to evaluate these theories by comparing the role of the EU and the US/NATO in several domains of armed conflict in Europe. It focuses on the mechanisms through which the two organisations have affected the risk and scale of armed conflict within each domain. Although both the EU and the US/NATO have contributed to the relative peace in Europe since the end of the Second World War, there is at least one domain in which each of the organisations has either exacerbated or failed to prevent armed conflict. Understanding the limitations of the two organisations, as well as their strengths, will be important for bolstering European security as the continent faces new geopolitical challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl, Noah, 2019. "Prevention of Armed Conflict in Europe: Comparing the Role of the EU and the US/NATO," SocArXiv ds8px, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ds8px
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ds8px
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d78b2f535a800001a95f50d/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ds8px?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kris De Jaegher & Britta Hoyer, 2016. "Collective action and the common enemy effect," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 644-664, September.
    2. Feargal Cochrane, 2007. "Irish-America, the End of the IRA's Armed Struggle and the Utility of `Soft Power'," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 44(2), pages 215-231, March.
    3. Alberto Alesina & Roberto Perotti, 2004. "The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 27-48, Fall.
    4. J. Bradford De Long & Barry Eichengreen, 1991. "The Marshall Plan: History's Most Successful Structural Adjustment Program," NBER Working Papers 3899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Michael Spagat & Stijn van Weezel, 2018. "On the decline of war," Working Papers 201815, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    6. Rainer Schweickert & Inna Melnykovska & Hanno Heitmann, 2012. "Picking Winners? Evidence on NATO’s Enlargement Strategy," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 18(3), pages 570-585, March.
    7. George KYRIS, 2012. "The European Union and the Cyprus problem: a story of limited impetus," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3, pages 87-99, June.
    8. Tom Sauer, 2017. "The Origins of the Ukraine Crisis and the Need for Collective Security between Russia and the West," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 82-91, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:ds8px_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Greta Marianna & Lewandowski Krzysztof, 2015. "The Impact Of The Global Financial And Economic Crisis Convergence Process In OECD Countries," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 81-96, March.
    3. Rosier Kevin J., 2025. "Debt Diplomacy and Trust: Lessons from the European Recovery Plan," Economic Diplomacy, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 122-134.
    4. Crafts, Nicholas & Toniolo, Gianni, 2008. "European Economic Growth, 1950-2005: An Overview," CEPR Discussion Papers 6863, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Floriana Cerniglia & Laura Pagani, 2007. "The allocation of competences between the European Union and the Member States: an analysis of the determinants of Europeans’ preferences," Working Papers 118, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 2007.
    6. Benner, Joachim & Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Scheide, Joachim, 2005. "Euroland: Recovery is slowly gaining momentum," Kiel Economic Policy Papers 3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Knack, Stephen, 2013. "Aid and donor trust in recipient country systems," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 316-329.
    8. Alberto Alesina & Silvia Ardagna & Vincenzo Galasso, 2011. "The Euro and Structural Reforms," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 2(1).
    9. Britta Hoyer & Kris De Jaegher, 2023. "Network disruption and the common-enemy effect," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 117-155, March.
    10. Knack, Stephen & Rahman, Aminur, 2007. "Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 176-197, May.
    11. Jin, Zhangfeng, 2021. "The Legacies of the Soviet Influence in the 1950s: China's 156 Major Industrial Projects," GLO Discussion Paper Series 932, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Campoy Juan Cristóbal & Negrete Juan C., 2010. "Structural Reforms and Budget Deficits in a Monetary Union: A Strategic Approach," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, July.
    13. Fèvre, Raphaël, 2021. "The Madman and the Economist(s): Georges Bataille and François Perroux as French Critiques of the Marshall Plan," OSF Preprints 6hnvk, Center for Open Science.
    14. Godefroy Dang Nguyen & Maya Jollès, 2005. "Does the European Union Create the Foundations of an Information Society for All?," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 11, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    15. J. Bradford De Long, "undated". "Productivity and Machinery Investment: A Long Run Look 1870-1980," J. Bradford De Long's Working Papers _118, University of California at Berkeley, Economics Department.
    16. Konrad, Kai A., 2024. "The collective security dilemma of preemptive strikes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1191-1199.
    17. Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2008. "How to Deal with Economic Divergences in the EMU?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Jesús Ferreiro & Giuseppe Fontana & Felipe Serrano (ed.), Fiscal Policy in the European Union, chapter 7, pages 157-183, Palgrave Macmillan.
    18. Granville, Brigitte & Mallick, Sushanta, 2009. "Monetary and financial stability in the euro area: Pro-cyclicality versus trade-off," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 662-674, October.
    19. Gács, János, 2005. "A lisszaboni folyamat - egy hosszú távú stratégia rejtélyei, elméleti problémái és gyakorlati nehézségei [The Lisbon Process: puzzles, theoretical problems and practical difficulties of a long-term," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 205-230.
    20. Nick Hanley & Les Oxley & David Greasley & Eoin McLaughlin & Matthias Blum, 2016. "Empirical Testing of Genuine Savings as an Indicator of Weak Sustainability: A Three-Country Analysis of Long-Run Trends," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(2), pages 313-338, February.
    21. Enrico Spolaore, 2013. "What Is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 125-144, Summer.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ds8px. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.