IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/7ex6z.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In the driver’s seat: Pathways to automobile ownership for lower-income households in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Nicholas J.

    (Conrell University)

  • Basu, Rounaq
  • Smart, Michael J.

Abstract

We examine how lower-income households in the United States acquire automobiles. Although car ownership plays an important role in social and economic mobility in the U.S., transportation scholars know little about how households acquire cars. We use an online opt-in survey of adults from lower-income households to examine how and why they acquire cars, and the effects of these different pathways to car ownership on finances and quality of life. We identify five pathways to car ownership: buying a new car, buying a used car at a dealer, buying a used car from informal markets, receiving a car as a gift, and obtaining a car through a life-event (e.g., moving in with a car owner). The most common path is to acquire a used car from a dealer (38% of our sample), followed by acquiring a used car informally (24%), purchasing new (17%), receiving a car as a gift (15%), and via a move-in (5%). Respondents most often acquired a car for financial reasons and to increase accessibility. In contrast, the COVID-19 pandemic, life-events, and built environment factors played a smaller role. Respondents reported that acquiring a car had a positive effect on their lives. The overwhelming majority said the effect on their quality of life was positive and getting a car was worth it. However, almost half experienced some type of financial hardship related to owning and operating their car.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Nicholas J. & Basu, Rounaq & Smart, Michael J., 2022. "In the driver’s seat: Pathways to automobile ownership for lower-income households in the United States," SocArXiv 7ex6z, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7ex6z
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7ex6z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62e450a23f1ed3058f4115f0/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7ex6z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palm, Matthew & Allen, Jeff & Zhang, Yixue & Aitken, Ignacio Tiznado & BATOMEN, BRICE & Farber, Steven & Widener, Michael, 2022. "Facing the future of transit ridership: which riders bought a car; who is planning on riding less?," OSF Preprints xrk2p, Center for Open Science.
    2. Ayres, Ian & Siegelman, Peter, 1995. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 304-321, June.
    3. Brown, Anne E., 2017. "Car-less or car-free? Socioeconomic and mobility differences among zero-car households," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 152-159.
    4. Nicholas J. Klein & Michael J. Smart, 2017. "Car today, gone tomorrow: The ephemeral car in low-income, immigrant and minority families," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 495-510, May.
    5. Giulio Mattioli, 2017. "‘Forced Car Ownership’ in the UK and Germany: Socio-Spatial Patterns and Potential Economic Stress Impacts," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 147-160.
    6. Fiona Morton & Florian Zettelmeyer & Jorge Silva-Risso, 2003. "Consumer Information and Discrimination: Does the Internet Affect the Pricing of New Cars to Women and Minorities?," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 65-92, March.
    7. Paul M. Ong & Michael A. Stoll, 2007. "Redlining or risk? A spatial analysis of auto insurance rates in Los Angeles," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 811-830.
    8. Jeroen Bastiaanssen & Daniel Johnson & Karen Lucas, 2020. "Does transport help people to gain employment? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 607-628, July.
    9. Palan, Stefan & Schitter, Christian, 2018. "Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 22-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klein, Nicholas J. & Tran, Minh & Riley, Sarah, 2020. "“Desperately Need a Car”: Analyzing Crowdfunding Campaigns for Car Purchases and Repairs on Gofundme.com," SocArXiv 8x7d2, Center for Open Science.
    2. Priyanga Gunarathne & Huaxia Rui & Abraham Seidmann, 2022. "Racial Bias in Customer Service: Evidence from Twitter," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 43-54, March.
    3. Aksoy, Billur & Chadd, Ian & Koh, Boon Han, 2023. "Sexual identity, gender, and anticipated discrimination in prosocial behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Michael Luca, 2016. "Designing Online Marketplaces: Trust and Reputation Mechanisms," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 17, pages 77-93, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Guofang Huang, 2020. "When to haggle, when to hold firm? Lessons from the used‐car retail market," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 579-604, July.
    6. David P Byrne & Leslie A Martin & Jia Sheen Nah, 2023. "Price Discrimination by Negotiation: a Field Experiment in Retail Electricity," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(4), pages 2499-2537.
    7. Pritchard, John P. & Zanchetta, Anna & Martens, Karel, 2022. "A new index to assess the situation of subgroups, with an application to public transport disadvantage in US metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 86-100.
    8. Ambarish Chandra & Sumeet Gulati & James M. Sallee, 2017. "Who Loses when Prices are Negotiated? An Analysis of the New Car Market," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 235-274, June.
    9. Eva Van Eenoo, 2023. "Zero-Car Households: Urban, Single, and Low-Income?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 27-40.
    10. O. Cem Ozturk & Cheng He & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2024. "Frontiers: Inequalities in Dealers’ Interest Rate Markups? A Gender- and Race-Based Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 20-32, January.
    11. Nathan Blascak & Anna Tranfaglia, 2021. "Decomposing Gender Differences in Bankcard Credit Limits," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-072, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    12. Michael Luca, 2016. "Designing Online Marketplaces: Trust and Reputation Mechanisms," NBER Working Papers 22616, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Graddy, Kathryn & Hall, George, 2011. "A dynamic model of price discrimination and inventory management at the Fulton Fish Market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 6-19.
    14. Klinner, Nicole S. & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2013. "Customer perceptions of discrimination in service deliveries: Construction and validation of a measurement instrument," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 651-658.
    15. Lu Fang & Henry J. Munneke, 2020. "Gender Equality in Mortgage Lending," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 48(4), pages 957-1003, December.
    16. Owan, Hideo & 都留, 康 & Tsuru, Tsuyoshi & Uehara, Katsuhito, 2012. "Seller-Buyer Ethnic Matches: The Case Of Car Transactions At Two North American Auto Dealerships," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 53(2), pages 217-236, December.
    17. Benjamin Edelman & Micahel Luca, 2014. "Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-054, Harvard Business School.
    18. Mattioli, Giulio & Wadud, Zia & Lucas, Karen, 2018. "Vulnerability to fuel price increases in the UK: A household level analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 227-242.
    19. Billur Aksoy & Ian Chadd & Boon Han Koh, 2022. "(Anticipated) Discrimination against Sexual Minorities in Prosocial Domains," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2021-08, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    20. Paul Goldsmith‐Pinkham & Kelly Shue, 2023. "The Gender Gap in Housing Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(2), pages 1097-1145, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7ex6z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.