IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/npf/wpaper/25-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiscal Policy for Equity:Analysing the Public Expenditure Benefit Incidence of Health Sector in India

Author

Listed:
  • Chakraborty, Lekha

    (National Institute of Public Finance and Policy)

  • Bhadra, Kaushik

    (UNICEF)

  • Arora, Rashmi

    (University of Bradford)

Abstract

The public expenditure benefit incidence analysis captures how well public services are targeted to certain groups in the population, across gender, ethnicity, income quintiles and geographical units. The BIA involves allocating unit cost according to individual utilization rates of public services. Using the latest International Classification of Diseases (ICD) produced by World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2024, we examine the disease-wise utilisation of publicly subsidised healthcare in India using benefit incidence analysis. Quite contrary to the earlier studies on benefit incidence analysis based on "aggregate" public health spending, our study attempts the benefit capture at the disaggregate level by meticulously mapping the WHO_ICD disease-specific codes to the data extracted from the unit records of the latest National Sample Survey health 75th rounds. Our broad findings based on the WHO_ICD disease-specific benefit incidence analysis revealed that the public health subsidy appears to be pro-poor or progressive in distribution for WHO_ICD categories, however with evident gender differentials. The disaggregated benefit incidence analysis based on ICD codes also showed that there is no "elite capture" in the public health financing in India. This inference has policy implications for strengthening the role of fiscal policy in tackling inequalities in the access and utilisation of health care in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakraborty, Lekha & Bhadra, Kaushik & Arora, Rashmi, 2025. "Fiscal Policy for Equity:Analysing the Public Expenditure Benefit Incidence of Health Sector in India," Working Papers 25/425, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:25/425
    Note: Working Paper 425, 2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nipfp.org.in/media/medialibrary/2025/04/WP_425_2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosario G. Manasan & Janet S. Cuenca & Eden C. Villanueva, 2007. "Benefit Incidence of Public Spending on Education in the Philippines," Governance Working Papers 21930, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Mouhamed Samba & Ibrahima Thiam & Elisabeth Paul, 2024. "Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/378404, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Castro-Leal, Florencia & Dayton, Julia & Demery, Lionel & Mehra, Kalpana, 1999. "Public Social Spending in Africa: Do the Poor Benefit?," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 14(1), pages 49-72, February.
    4. Lanjouw, Peter & Ravallion, Martin, 1999. "Benefit Incidence, Public Spending Reforms, and the Timing of Program Capture," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 13(2), pages 257-273, May.
    5. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    6. Barik, Debasis & Thorat, Amit, 2015. "Issues of unequal access to public health in India," MPRA Paper 77224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Nora Lustig, 2015. "The Redistributive Impactive of Government Spending on Education and Health Evidence from Thirteen Developing Countries in the Commitment to Equity Project," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 1330, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    8. Hamid R. Davoodi & Erwin R Tiongson & Sawitree Sachjapinan Asawanuchit, 2010. "Benefit Incidence of Public Education and Health Spending Worldwide: Evidence From A New Database," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 5-52, May.
    9. Joan Costa-Font & Divya Parmar, 2016. "Political agency and public healthcare: Evidence from India," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Nora Lustig, 2015. "The Redistributive Impactive of Government Spending on Education and Health Evidence from Thirteen Developing Countries in the Commitment to Equity Project," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 30, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    11. Kausik K. Bhadra, 2016. "Inequality Effects of Fiscal Policy: Analysing the Benefit Incidence on Health Sector in India," Working Papers id:8433, eSocialSciences.
    12. Chakraborty, Lekha, 2025. "Mining Royalty is not Tax: Analyzing the Supreme Court Judgment," Working Papers 25/423, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    13. Filmer, Deon & Pritchett, Lant, 1998. "Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears : with an application to educational enrollments in states of India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1994, The World Bank.
    14. Sri Hari Nayudu A. & Chakraborty, Lekha, 2025. "Fiscal Transparency and Budgetary Processes in India: Issues before the 16th Finance Commission," Working Papers 25/424, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    15. Mr. Erwin H Tiongson & Mr. Hamid R Davoodi & Sawitree S. Asawanuchit, 2003. "How Useful Are Benefit Incidence Analyses of Public Education and Health Spending," IMF Working Papers 2003/227, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chakraborty, Lekha S & Bhadra, Kaushik & Arora, Rashmi, 2025. "Health Expenditure Benefit Incidence: WHO International Classification of Diseases-wise Analysis of India," MPRA Paper 123785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Runu Bhatka, 2016. "Educational Attainment of Young Adults in India: Measures, Trends and Determinants," Working Papers id:8435, eSocialSciences.
    3. Kausik K. Bhadra, 2016. "Inequality Effects of Fiscal Policy: Analysing the Benefit Incidence on Health Sector in India," Working Papers id:8433, eSocialSciences.
    4. Bhadra, Kaushik K., 2015. "Inequality Effects of Fiscal Policy: Analysing the Benefit Incidence on Health Sector in India," Working Papers 15/158, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    5. Sergio Urzua, 2019. "Redistribution Through Education: The Value of Public Education Spending," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 88, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    6. Essama-Nssah, B., 2008. "Assessing the redistributive effect of fiscal policy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4592, The World Bank.
    7. Nora Lustig, 2017. "Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in Low and Middle Income Countries," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 54, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    8. Higgins, Sean & Lustig, Nora, 2016. "Can a poverty-reducing and progressive tax and transfer system hurt the poor?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 63-75.
    9. Hisatoshi Hoken & Hiroshi Sato, 2022. "Effects of Public Transfers on Income Inequality and Poverty in Rural China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(5), pages 29-48, September.
    10. Nora Lustig, 2016. "Fiscal Policy, Inequality and the Poor in the Developing World," Working Papers 1612, Tulane University, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2017.
    11. Ajwad, Mohamed Ihsan & Wodon, Quentin, 2007. "Do local Governments maximize access rates to public services across areas?: A test based on marginal benefit incidence analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 242-260, May.
    12. Patrick GUILLAUMONT, 2009. "Aid effectiveness for poverty reduction: macroeconomic overview and emerging issues," Working Papers P05, FERDI.
    13. Nora Lustig, 2016. "El Impacto del Sistema Tributario y el Gasto Social en la Distribucion del Ingreso y la Pobreza en America Latina: Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatema," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 37, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    14. Haydeeliz Carrasco & Hamidou Jawara & Moritz Meyer, 2022. "The Effects Of Fiscal Policy On Inequality And Poverty In The Gambia," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 117, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    15. Mingsheng Chen & Guixia Fang & Lidan Wang & Zhonghua Wang & Yuxin Zhao & Lei Si, 2015. "Who Benefits from Government Healthcare Subsidies? An Assessment of the Equity of Healthcare Benefits Distribution in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    16. L. ALAN WINTERS & NEIL McCULLOCH & ANDREW McKAY, 2015. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Non-Tariff Barriers, Regionalism and Poverty Essays in Applied International Trade Analysis, chapter 14, pages 271-314, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. David Stifel & Harold Alderman, 2006. "The "Glass of Milk" Subsidy Program and Malnutrition in Peru," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 20(3), pages 421-448.
    18. Janet S. Cuenca, 2008. "Benefit Incidence Analysis of Public Spending on Education in the Philippines : A Methodological Note," Development Economics Working Papers 22627, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    19. Nora Lustig, 2016. "El Impacto del Sistema Tributario y el Gasto Social en la Distribución del Ingreso y la Pobreza en América Latina: Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatema," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 1337, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    20. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2007. "Budget Policy and Income Distribution," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0707, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    concentration curve ; public healthcare ; health inequality ; benefit incidence analysis ; gender;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:25/425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S.Siva Chidambaram The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask S.Siva Chidambaram to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nipfp.org.in .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.