IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/1c62af02c376466bbed3333ebc91d057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selecting the Best Comparison Group and Evaluation Design: A Guidance Document for State Section 1115 Demonstration Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • James D. Reschovsky
  • Jessica Heeringa
  • Maggie Colby

Abstract

This guidance document focuses on quantitative impact evaluations, which assess the causal effects of an intervention by comparing outcomes under the demonstration’s policies with an estimate of what would have happened under a counterfactual—that is, what would have happened in the absence of those policies or if the policies had been implemented differently.

Suggested Citation

  • James D. Reschovsky & Jessica Heeringa & Maggie Colby, "undated". "Selecting the Best Comparison Group and Evaluation Design: A Guidance Document for State Section 1115 Demonstration Evaluations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1c62af02c376466bbed3333eb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:1c62af02c376466bbed3333ebc91d057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2018/comparison-grp-eval-dsgn-section-1115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Finkelstein & Sarah Taubman & Bill Wright & Mira Bernstein & Jonathan Gruber & Joseph P. Newhouse & Heidi Allen & Katherine Baicker, 2012. "The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(3), pages 1057-1106.
    2. Robert Moffitt, 1991. "Program Evaluation With Nonexperimental Data," Evaluation Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 291-314, June.
    3. Keith Kranker & So O'Neil & Vanessa Oddo & Miriam Drapkin & Margo Rosenbach, "undated". "Strategies for Using Vital Records to Measure Quality of Care in Medicaid and CHIP Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4c9ca4dbc4d24cf5ac7dc5923, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James D. Reschovsky & Katharine Bradley, "undated". "Planning Section 1115 Demonstration Implementation to Enable Strong Evaluation Designs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7c4bfb55d1aa43d3a037f0782, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Kara Contreary & Katharine Bradley & Sandra Chao, "undated". "Best Practices in Causal Inference for Evaluations of Section 1115 Eligibility and Coverage Demonstrations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1814ed988b2f46d9bdfe25e93, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elira Kuka, 2020. "Quantifying the Benefits of Social Insurance: Unemployment Insurance and Health," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 490-505, July.
    2. Charles Courtemanche & James Marton & Benjamin Ukert & Aaron Yelowitz & Daniela Zapata, 2018. "Early Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Access, Risky Health Behaviors, and Self‐Assessed Health," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(3), pages 660-691, January.
    3. Jeffrey Smith, 2000. "A Critical Survey of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 136(III), pages 247-268, September.
    4. Galiani, Sebastian & Gertler, Paul & Bando, Rosangela, 2016. "Non-contributory pensions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 47-58.
    5. Costa-Font, Joan & Raut, Nilesh & Van Houtven, Courtney, 2021. "Medicaid Expansion and the Mental Health of Spousal Caregivers," IZA Discussion Papers 14754, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Patrick Richard & Regine Walker & Pierre Alexandre, 2018. "The burden of out of pocket costs and medical debt faced by households with chronic health conditions in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Lan Thi Thu Phan & Yusuke Jinnai, 2018. "Does health insurance matter in the hospital? New evidence from patient-level medical records in Vietnam," Working Papers EMS_2018_01, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    8. Marianne P. Bitler & Madeline Zavodny, 2014. "Medicaid: A Review of the Literature," NBER Working Papers 20169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Pedro Carneiro & Sokbae Lee & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Optimal data collection for randomized control trials [Microcredit impacts: Evidence from a randomized microcredit program placement experiment by Compartamos Banco]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(1), pages 1-31.
    10. Mariacristina De Nardi & Eric French & John Bailey Jones, 2016. "Medicaid Insurance in Old Age," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(11), pages 3480-3520, November.
    11. Bradley Heim & Ithai Lurie & Kosali Simon, 2015. "The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Young Adult Provision on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Tax Data," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 133-157.
    12. Anell, Anders & Dietrichson, Jens & Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav, 2022. "Well-Informed Choices? Effects of Information Interventions in Primary Care on Care Quality," Working Papers 2022:2, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    13. Gabriella Conti & Rita Ginja, 2023. "Who Benefits from Free Health Insurance?: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 58(1), pages 146-182.
    14. Fitzsimons, Emla & Malde, Bansi & Mesnard, Alice & Vera-Hernández, Marcos, 2016. "Nutrition, information and household behavior: Experimental evidence from Malawi," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 113-126.
    15. Singh, Nirvikar, 2018. "Financial Inclusion: Concepts, Issues and Policies for India," MPRA Paper 91047, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Will Dobbie & Paul Goldsmith‐Pinkham & Neale Mahoney & Jae Song, 2020. "Bad Credit, No Problem? Credit and Labor Market Consequences of Bad Credit Reports," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(5), pages 2377-2419, October.
    17. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val & Blaise Melly & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2020. "Generic Inference on Quantile and Quantile Effect Functions for Discrete Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 123-137, January.
    18. Nicholas Bagley & Benjamin Berger & Amitabh Chandra & Craig Garthwaite & Ariel D. Stern, 2018. "The Orphan Drug Act at 35: Observations and an Outlook for the Twenty-First Century," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 19, pages 97-137, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Sebastian Panthöfer, 2016. "Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt‐Out," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(9), pages 1163-1181, September.
    20. Sophie Webber, 2015. "Randomising Development: Geography, Economics and the Search for Scientific Rigour," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(1), pages 36-52, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:1c62af02c376466bbed3333ebc91d057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.