IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mon/ceddtr/81.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les analyses qualitatives de la pauvreté : continuité ou rupture ?

Author

Abstract

La prise en compte des multiples dimensions de la pauvreté ainsi que le repérage de nouvelles formes de pauvreté ont conduit à un enrichissement progressif des thématiques liées à l'analyse de ce phénomène économique et social. Les méthodologies dites qualitatives se sont développées afin de répondre à ces nouveaux questionnements en prenant en compte les perceptions de la pauvreté ainsi que les aspects sociaux et culturels conjointement aux aspects strictement économiques. De part leur cadre paradigmatique compréhensif, elles s'inscrivent en rupture par rapport aux approches standards de la pauvreté. En retenant un concept de bien-être fondé sur les réalités vécues de la pauvreté, les approches qualitatives ont produit des résultats centraux notamment en ce qui concerne l'identification de la pauvreté et l'analyse du processus de la pauvreté. Cependant, les analyses qualitatives sont profondément complémentaires des analyses quantitatives. En effet les premières sont caractérisées par l'observation du singulier quand les secondes ont pour objectif le repérage de relations stables et régulières. La combinaison qualitatif-quantitatif permet ainsi d'enrichir l'analyse de la pauvreté. Investigations about poverty dimensions and new forms of poverty have broadened the concept of poverty and, as a consequence, the scientific debate. Qualitative methods are a way to take into account these new issues by intergrating on the one hand, individual perceptions ofpoverty, and, on the other hand, cultural, social and economic aspects. Actualy, one of the mainquestions concerns continuity or change between the different kinds of approaches : qualitative or quantitative ones. There is an epistemologic gap. Qualitative approaches — that rely on self-perception of well-being by individuals — appear to be more relevant than standards methodsin order to identify who the poors really are. Nevertheless both of these approaches are fully complementary. As a matter of fact, the first one focuses on the observation of which is particular, meanwhile the second one deals wilth the raising of regular and stable relations. Combining qualitative and quantitative investigations permits then to improve poverty analysis.(Full text in French)

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Gondard-Delcroix, 2003. "Les analyses qualitatives de la pauvreté : continuité ou rupture ?," Documents de travail 81, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
  • Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/ceddt81.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesko Hentschel, 1999. "Contextuality and data collection methods: A framework and application to health service utilisation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 64-94.
    2. Ravallion, Martin & Lokshin, Michael, 2001. "Identifying Welfare Effects from Subjective Questions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 68(271), pages 335-357, August.
    3. Kanbur, Ravi & Squire, Lyn, 1999. "The Evolution of Thinking About Poverty: Exploring the Interactions," Working Papers 127697, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.